Sign In Join 



Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

19247 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 7:46 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars


Messages Page 1582 of 1925
1
...
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
...
1925
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#15808 of 19247
Re: Vancouver beaters for under $1000 [fintail] by explorerx4
Nov 08, 2008 (7:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Nov 08, 2008 7:24 pm)

i think that engine still lives on as the 4.0 liter in explorers, mustangs and rangers.
#15809 of 19247
#15795 of 15808 Re that '76 Comet (explorerx4) by hpmctorque
Nov 08, 2008 (9:50 pm)
Reply
That car appears to be in very good condition, but the 250 c.i. I-6 is an overhead valve design, not a flathead, as the seller says. Of course, would it really matter?
 
As for that Mercedes 190D, we've been repeatedly warned to stay away from these things in the Classics discussions. I happen to like them, but I heed expert advice, so I wouldn't buy one.
#15810 of 19247
Re: Vancouver beaters for under $1000 [fintail] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 08, 2008 (10:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Nov 08, 2008 7:24 pm)

Yes the MB coupe must be a typo. A 2.8 low grille should be worth about $11,000 in that condition, but this "rust" thingie is something worth exploring further. The car could be damaged beyond repair if it's in the bulkheads.
#15811 of 19247
Re: Vancouver beaters for under $1000 [boomchek] by andre1969
Nov 08, 2008 (10:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boomchek (Nov 08, 2008 4:44 pm)

I like that '77 LeMans, but I wish they'd list the engine. I mean, how hard is it to look under the hood and read the sticker? I guess it's possible the sticker's gone, though. The smallest V-8 these things had was an Olds 260, although the Pontiac 301 was much more common. I think they might have used Chevy engines, like the 305, in the Canadian models.
 
I kinda like that '82 Cordoba, too, although I wonder how bad that body damage is. I'm sure once you started tearing into it, it would be worse than it looks. I also don't relish the idea of driving around in something that size with a 90 hp slant six. This was one instance where you'd actually get better fuel economy with the bigger engine! The 318 had a 2.26:1 axle and enough power to move these cars. Not blindingly quick with 130 hp, obviously, but it didn't have to work very hard either. The 225 slant six was mated to a 2.94:1 axle though. Emissions controls tended to hurt its power and economy worse than they did with the V-8's.
#15812 of 19247
Re: Circling back To That '79 MB 300 SD... [Mr_Shiftright] (fintail) [hpmctorque] by fintail
Nov 09, 2008 (9:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Nov 08, 2008 10:24 am)

I'll say from what I can gather from the actions and words of passersby when I drive the fintail, it gets as much attention and admiration as a high end modern car. I doubt the average new Bentley driver gets many thumbs up, waves, kids pointing at it, etc. A mint W116 might not get that reaction, but it's still a classy looking old beast...even with the horrible US-spec bumpers.
 
I don't let valets park my car either...never had the chance come up in the fintail (I bet that car would confuse them or they'd injure it) and the E55 might tempt someone into at least chirping the tires.
 
I have questioned why I have this loyalty to MB, even though I don't buy them new. I like the styling, I like the heritage, I like how they feel when driven - there is some kind of dynamic links between old and new models, this was especially true in my fintail vs W126. I'd rather have a car that looks a little sinister than one that simply looks rich...and a MB sedan fits that too, thanks to Hollywood.
#15813 of 19247
Re: Vancouver beaters for under $1000 [fintail] by lemmer
Nov 10, 2008 (6:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Nov 08, 2008 7:18 pm)

The 4 car guy is an idiot of some kind.
 
Perfect comment. I am not sure what kind of idiot he is, but clearly he is some kind of idiot.
#15814 of 19247
Re: shifty [explorerx4 and bumpy] by qbrozen
Nov 10, 2008 (12:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 07, 2008 5:46 pm)

see, now, I like the S2ks and the Z3s .... but THIS makes me drool.
#15815 of 19247
Re: shifty [qbrozen] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 10, 2008 (2:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 10, 2008 12:01 pm)

Color's good, miles are good...but...it's not an S after all, so you'd best drive one to make SURE you don't mind....
#15816 of 19247
Re: shifty [Mr_Shiftright] by qbrozen
Nov 10, 2008 (3:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 10, 2008 2:00 pm)

Right. Well, they didn't start the S until 2000, so any of those first few years only came as the "base" model.
 
The 2.5 still gets it to 60mph in about 6.5 secs. I don't suspect that will be much of a problem. The S model only shaved about .7 secs off of that. Handling-wise ... well, that can always be tweaked. I would imagine it would still spank my G35X around the track.
 
Interesting to note, however, that the 2000 base model got bumped to a 2.7 engine and lost ~30 lbs, yet, according to edmunds, didn't get any faster.
#15817 of 19247
Re: shifty [qbrozen] by bumpy
Nov 10, 2008 (3:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 10, 2008 12:01 pm)

Yeah, it's all good and fun until the engine grenades on you.

Messages Page 1582 of 1925
1
...
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
...
1925
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement