Sign In Join 



2009 Nissan Skyline GT-R

269 messages,  Last post on Feb 05, 2009 at 3:50 PM

You are in the Nissan GT-R Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Nissan GT-R


Messages Page 24 of 28
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#223 of 269
Re: The GT-R - Don't get it twisted... [paisan] by tonycarl
Jan 29, 2008 (12:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Jan 28, 2008 6:22 pm)

Well, I'm all for what's best for the consumer. Automatics and SMG's will always cost more to make and manufacture. It's Nissans call to configure the car this way for mostly performance reasons. Sure, everything has it's pros and cons.
 
Swift Engineering sold hand-built limited production Formula Atlantic gearboxes for around $20k. Most of the parts required to build it were supplied by Hewland, Quaife, etc. You're right about the possiblity of not being able to go down to Kragen or Autozone to get GT-R transmission parts. How much Infinity will charge for labor I assume would be the same hourly rate they would charge on any other Infinity. Maybe the GT-R will have a lifetime warranty on their transmissions?
 
I don't know very much about the transmission going into the GT-R, but I think they also might have chose it for it's ability to handle the powerband in an AWD configuration. It's also a 7 speed so it has more options to choose different gear ratios for race circuit applications.
#224 of 269
Re: The GT-R - Don't get it twisted... [tonycarl] by paisan
Jan 29, 2008 (4:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tonycarl (Jan 29, 2008 12:17 pm)

You still won't get the connected feeling of a manual, no matter what you tell me, you aren't gonna convince me that it's a good thing. This coming from someone who has raced automatics and manuals in AWD cars on road courses.
 
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
#225 of 269
GTR blog and photos by blkbr0tha
Jan 31, 2008 (1:49 pm)
Reply
Just saw this and thought I would share.. its kind of old- but hey the pics speak for themselves!! Enjoy
 
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-nissan-gt-r-live-reveal/454772/
#226 of 269
GTR OVER PRICED by skarie
Jan 31, 2008 (7:33 pm)
Reply
Dealer markups to push GT-R pricing as high as $129,000.
 
Although the Nissan GT-R will sticker for about $69,000 when it goes on sale in the U.S. later this year, prospective buyers will be hard pressed to find any Nissan dealers to offer the supercar at that price. The combination of the GT-R's limited availability and Nissan's lack of dealer pricing control could see some of the turbocharged coupes going for as high as $129,000 — nearly double the car's MSRP.
 
Exhaustnote.com called on 15 Nissan dealers through the United States and found that the GT-R will command at least $20,000 over its window sticker. Several dealers even said they were going to handle GT-R sales like an auction, pitting prospective buyers against one another.
 
One dealership in Carson, California said they would markup the GT-R by about $50,000 — joking the markup would be about the same as a new Nissan 350Z and Sentra.
 
The highest markup found was $60,000, bringing the GT-R's out-the-door price to a staggering $129,000.
 
The huge markups are due to extremely limited availability of Nissan's latest supercar — only 1,500 GT-Rs will be available in the U.S. this year. Most dealerships will only get 2 or 3 cars, but most have waiting lists at least 40 people deep.
 
While Nissan has counseled its dealers on markups — one of the GT-R's greatest assets was supposed to be amazing performance at a value price — the Japanese automaker has no control over how much dealers will actually charge.
#227 of 269
going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... by thenebean
Feb 12, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply
i think it was pnc4 that said that the GT-R is a front engine vehicle. If i recall correctly, the engine is over or behind the front axle, not in front of it. I think at that point, it would be considered a front mid-engine vehicle. Nissan also counters the engine weight by putting the transmission in the rear of the vehicle as well, helping keep the weight balanced. I would think that between that, and the AWD, that the car handles just fine - not twitchy like pnc4 suggested.
 
and if you can believe what you read in these car mags, many drivers have stated that they feel comfortable and confident pushing the GT-R to its limits, far more so than the 911 or any other exotic sportscar they've driven before...
 
something to be said for that i think....
 
-thene
#228 of 269
Re: going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... [thenebean] by madmanmoo
Feb 12, 2008 (12:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thenebean (Feb 12, 2008 12:05 pm)


 
Looks like the long arm of the law came sweeping through here.
 
Also looks like you've got that all correct, thene. Based on what I've read as well, all you said is accurate. The point has been brought up a number of times, but people are voicing concern over the difference in weight between the Turbo and GT-R. I believe that the GT-R is 300lbs heavier. Thought pattern is that will make the vehicle seem less manageable.
 
/shrug
 
-moo
#229 of 269
Re: going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... [madmanmoo] by thenebean
Feb 12, 2008 (1:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: madmanmoo (Feb 12, 2008 12:27 pm)

i wish i could TEST DRIVE the GT-R so i could provide some feedback on that particular issue (weight vs. managability), however i highly doubt that i'll get that opportunity anytime soon.
 
i can only base what i know on what i read, and there seems to be a large majority that indicate that the weight does not affect the handling as much as some people would think...
 
who knows! im just bored at work and feel that the GT-R is far more interesting than anything going on here
 
-thene
#230 of 269
Re: going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... [thenebean] by madmanmoo
Feb 12, 2008 (1:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thenebean (Feb 12, 2008 1:36 pm)

I wish the thing would hit the lots already so we can stop speculating and get firsthand feedback from real buyers. The funny thing is, I bet I'm going to be able to drive one sooner than the Nissan salesguys. I'll bet ya anything we get one as a trade-in shortly after they are released.
 
-moo
#231 of 269
Re: going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... [madmanmoo] by thenebean
Feb 13, 2008 (7:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: madmanmoo (Feb 12, 2008 1:43 pm)

i wouldn't doubt it - im guessing the people who have the money to buy one will get one, drive it a bit, and then trade it in for another toy.
 
i may have to save my pennies for a used one in a couple of years...it would be perfect as a sports car in the wonderfully snowy northeast!
 
if you get a chance to drive it moo - please let us know what you think!
 
im excited because im going to NYIAS in march and i'll just get to see it in person, which i can't wait for! that and the new maxima, and the cube...
 
cars are great!
 
-thene
#232 of 269
Re: going back to the mid-engine vs. front engine thing... [thenebean] by 240ka
Feb 15, 2008 (4:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thenebean (Feb 13, 2008 7:27 am)

i wouldnt count on that. People dont buy and trade in cars like the Skyline or GT-R

Messages Page 24 of 28
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement