Sign In Join 



Daimler's abuse of the Dodge Charger legacy.

659 messages,  Last post on Jun 21, 2006 at 2:03 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Dodge


Messages Page 8 of 67
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#64 of 659
I'm not sure about later into the 80's... by andre1969
Oct 25, 2004 (7:04 am)
Reply
but I think there might have been a manual option in the '78-80 timeframe. At least, I know there was a 4-speed option for the Grand Prix...I think it was available for the Monte as well. Throughout the 80's, I think most of them just used lightweight Turbo-Hydramatic 200Cs, or the 4-speed overdrive variant of it. Sometimes the TH350 would show up behind the Buick 231 V-6 (my '82 Cutlass Supreme had one) but I think the Chevy engines got mainly the 200C trannies.
 
I had an '88 LeBaron turbo coupe when I was married. It was actually fairly reliable up to around 90,000 miles. Then all hell broke loose, and about the only thing mechanical that hadn't died by the 115-120K mark was the tranny, and even it was leaking fluid.
 
I think the LeBaron was definitely a looker, though, although when they went to exposed headlights for 1993(?), I thought that ruined the looks.
 
I thought that style-wise, the Sebring was a bit of a step down, too, although I did like the styling of the '96-00 generation. After the '01 refreshening though, I like it less, and it just comes off feeling cheaper, somehow. I don't know if they actually cheapened the cloud cars for 2001, or the competition just got that much better. Maybe a bit of both?
#65 of 659
by fintail
Oct 25, 2004 (3:08 pm)
Reply
There were manual 84 Montes sold in the Mexican market, of all places
#66 of 659
yes by ghulet
Nov 03, 2004 (5:08 pm)
Reply
An old woman who lived about four blocks from me when I was a kid had a super-strippo (not even a/c), light blue with light blue interior, '78 or '79 Monte with a four (or maybe three, or heck, maybe five, wish I would have checked more closely) speed manual on the floor, not sure what engine, but I'm guessing some sort of six. I can't remember if it had a bench or buckets, but I think bench. It's still the only one like it I've ever seen. Not sure if there's any way to find out how many like it were built.
 
Back on topic, in reading through this, I guess I'm not the only one who thinks the title of this topic is more than a little off-base, considering what Chrysler did to the Charger name through the years. Of course, they're hardly unique in that regard. How many bastardizations has the (now dead) T-bird been through?
#67 of 659
by kcram HOST
Dec 01, 2004 (11:02 am)
Reply
A story in this week's Automotive News says DC is getting lots of mail from people against using the Charger name on a 4-door body.
 
kcram
Host - Wagons
#68 of 659
I have a feeling... by andre1969
Dec 01, 2004 (11:42 am)
Reply
that the same thing happened over a decade ago, when Chevy did the blasphemous act of slapping SS badging on a Caprice, and in the process making one of the baddest big cars around since the switch to net horsepower ratings.
#69 of 659
Right - those SSs, in good shape, by driftracer
Dec 01, 2004 (11:58 am)
Reply
are pulling more money now than they cost new...a definite hit and a dumb mistake not to continue them.
 
I can't see how any Mopar fan, even a purist could ever gripe about a Hemi powered, low-slung "Charger"...especially when DCC has done MUCH worse things to that name...1984 Shelby Charger ring a bell??
 
I would think that the new Charger, if produced, would out-perform most versions of the old Charger, perhaps save for a hemi car, and then all you'd have to do is take a high-speed corner for the new one to win that competition.
#70 of 659
Re: Right - those SSs, in good shape, [driftracer] by andys120
Dec 01, 2004 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: driftracer (Dec 01, 2004 11:58 am)

The Shelby Charger was a blot on the name of both Shelby and Charger. It's also worth noting that the current Chrysler 300s are the first to come with four doors and are selling just fine, as well as outperforming (in 300C form) the 300-letter cars of yore.
#71 of 659
My only concern... by andre1969
Dec 01, 2004 (12:05 pm)
Reply
about the new Charger, is that some of the artists renderings make me think the end product may look like a rush-job, with just a bunch of haphazard, clunky, quickie styling changes applied to the Chrysler 300. Kind of like a modern take on those Dodge Darts that were badge-engineered into "Magnums", "Chargers", etc for the South American market. A lot of frivolous stuff tacked on, but blatantly obvious that the thing was intended to be a Dart underneath!
#72 of 659
by john_324
Dec 01, 2004 (1:22 pm)
Reply
I have to imagine, in the name of production economics, it'll be the four door...Not my first choice, but it's not bad-looking either.
 
Actually, the 1984 Shelby Charger was the best of a bad lot...try the "regular" Dodge Charger of the 1980s for a real treat. Friend in highschool had one, and maaannn what a slow car.
 
I think with the Caprice in the 1990s, nobody really noticed when they made the SS. Sure, the diehards and the car mags did, but it slipped by the rest of the population. It only became really sought after it was out a while, then esp. when it was canceled.
#73 of 659
Shelby Chargers by turboshadow
Dec 01, 2004 (1:25 pm)
Reply
Although I have to admit a bias towards turbo Mopars, I'm gonna have to siound up about the Shelby Chargers. Sure, they were poorly slapped together automobiles, sure they were no 'Charger' as the classic B-bods, but dang those little things could scoot. And with minimal dollars and a few easy mods, they could embarass many a big block, especially around corners.
 
Check out www.thedodgegarage.com for some info on these cars.
 
I've owned both a 69 Charger 383, and a Turbo Shadow, and I can tell evryone here that the Shadow would flat tear up that Charger. Straight lines, corners, etc....
 
And don't even get me started on Mother Mopar's decision to put little bitty drum brakes on those big-block cars. They were SCARY in emergency situations.
 
Turboshadow

Messages Page 8 of 67
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
67
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement