Sign In Join 



Honda Odyssey vs. Toyota Sienna

5227 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 5:09 AM

You are in the Honda Odyssey Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sienna, Honda Odyssey, Car Comparisons, Van


Messages Page 481 of 523
1
...
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
...
523
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4797 of 5227
Re: Odyssey after 8 years with Sienna [familyman] by ateixeira
Apr 13, 2009 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: familyman (Mar 26, 2009 9:33 pm)

Excellent write-up, familyman, thanks for taking the time to do that.
 
A couple of comments and counterpoints, though...
 
Your 2004 LE had 16" wheels with tall sidewall tires, while the Ody EX has 17" rims with performance tires. That's a pretty significant upgrade, one which is available in the Sienna XLE. Also, the Ody LX has 16" tires, just like the Sienna. So in the same price range you get apples-to-apples. You simply upgraded and paid more.
 
So a lot of that is just better tires. Not to mention brand new tires. And a brand new vehicle has brand new shocks, struts, etc., also.
 
Tires are the biggest factor by far, though.
 
The other thins is the 04 Sienna had the 3.3l engine, and the 07+ models got what I consider the most significant upgrade - the 3.5l engine. Not only does it supply a lot more horsepower, but also it does so with zero loss in fuel efficiency.
 
So you can have your cake and eat it, too.
 
Good job pointing out the pros and cons of each model, though, especially the trip computer vs. dual climate control trade-off.
 
Enjoy your new Ody.
#4798 of 5227
2009 Sienna vs Odyssey maintenance cost by cleverstar
Apr 13, 2009 (6:46 pm)
Reply
Thank you all for the insightful comments about these two models of minivan.
I have a couple of questions regarding their maintenance cost comparison, especially after their ages reach some milestones (I would like all to list those notorious milestones for various issues and painful experience):
1) Can someone comment on the Timing Chain vs Timing Belt pros and cons?
2) Saw discussions about transmission issues for old Odysseys, will 2009 version have similar issue and how does it compare to Sienna's transmission?
3) Power sliding doors or tailgate is a very convenient feature, but how is the reliability and maintenance cost?
Besides the luxuriance, drivability, performance, features, I think these maintenance factors may also impact my long term consideration in choosing sienna or odyssey...
#4799 of 5227
Re: 2009 Sienna vs Odyssey maintenance cost [cleverstar] by bobber1
Apr 13, 2009 (7:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cleverstar (Apr 13, 2009 6:46 pm)

Engines with timing belts tend to be quieter, but you do need to change the timing belt whereas you never will have to with the chains. I think you're supposed to change the Odyssey's timing belt at 90,000 mile intervals. The Toyotas have timing chains.
 
99-04 Odyssey had a lot of transmission problems. From what I've been able to gather it was a basic design flaw. 05's and newer have a new design and problems seem to be much less. 09 Odyssey will actually have a Ridgeline transmission which is supposed to be "heavier duty" than the pre 07's. Toyota's transmissions have been relatively trouble free.
 
I think Toyota had some problems with their power doors, but have got them worked out now. I haven't heard of many problems on the Honda. However the more complex the machines get, the more potential trouble you're asking for.
 
They're both great vans. I have an 07 Honda Odyssey EX and have had zero problems with it. Love the van.
#4800 of 5227
Re: 2009 Sienna vs Odyssey maintenance cost [cleverstar] by yatesjo
Apr 13, 2009 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cleverstar (Apr 13, 2009 6:46 pm)

Timing chain vs belt: The chain is a lot less maintenance and more reliable. Belts MUST be replaced every 60K miles or they will break and take the engine with them. Chains will go 100s kmiles, possible the life of the engine without replacement and when they do wear out they give warnings like slipping the timing instead of failing catastrophically and destroying the engine. The reason most modern engines go with belts is less noise and better fuel economy. Strangely, the Sienna with a chain is at least as efficient and quieter than the Ody with a belt.
 
The Ody's transmission issues are probably a thing of the past. The Sienna transmission can hesitate under some circumstances (though my experience is very seldom) but when it hooks up, the engine makes up for the tranny.
 
Power slide doors are one of those reasons we bought the extended warranty. More mechanical complexity = more possibility for expensive repairs but they are great to have while they work. Applies to power lift gates as well.
#4801 of 5227
Re: Odyssey after 8 years with Sienna [ateixeira] by thegraduate
Apr 14, 2009 (9:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Apr 13, 2009 12:05 pm)

Your 2004 LE had 16" wheels with tall sidewall tires, while the Ody EX has 17" rims with performance tires. That's a pretty significant upgrade, one which is available in the Sienna XLE. Also, the Ody LX has 16" tires, just like the Sienna. So in the same price range you get apples-to-apples. You simply upgraded and paid more.
 
The 2009 Odyssey LX, EX, and EX-L all use the same size all-season tire, not larger, high-performance ones:
235/65R16
 
The 2009 Sienna comes with two options for tires, according to the website.:
 
P215/65R16
P225/60R17
 
The Odyssey LX just comes with wheel-covers, while the EX/EX-L gives you alloys, and Touring trim gives you P235/60R17 tires and upsized alloys.
#4802 of 5227
Re: Odyssey after 8 years with Sienna [thegraduate] by ateixeira
Apr 14, 2009 (9:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 14, 2009 9:08 am)

I stand corrected, though now that I look again my buying guide says the run-flats on the Limited are 17.5"? That's odd.
 
Any how, that's still a 20mm advantage in width for the Ody vs. the LE.
 
The tires on my Sienna (Dunlops) are nothing to brag about, for certain I will upgrade to better tires when it's time to replace them. I may even to a Plus Zero to something like a 225/60 or 235/55 when the time comes.
 
C&D compared them and even with the 16" tires on both they tied for lateral grip, FWIW.
#4803 of 5227
Re: Odyssey after 8 years with Sienna [ateixeira] by thegraduate
Apr 14, 2009 (9:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Apr 14, 2009 9:21 am)

Those run-flats are always odd-sized, it seems . Was the same way for the Odyssey Touring w/run-flats, at least before the MMC.
 
My info was from the manufacturer websites, let's hope its correct!
#4804 of 5227
Re: Odyssey after 8 years with Sienna [thegraduate] by ateixeira
Apr 14, 2009 (9:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 14, 2009 9:22 am)

My source is Consumer's Guide, so you win.
 
Plus I'm looking at 2007s, which is when I cross-shopped them.
 
Toyota recommends 35psi in the tires, which is the highest I've ever experienced. Out of curiosity, does anyone know what Honda specifies for tire pressure (non run-flats)?
#4805 of 5227
Re: VSC ( Vehicle Stabiliy Control) [oldyellowcat] by winston7
Apr 14, 2009 (7:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldyellowcat (Apr 11, 2006 8:36 pm)

maybe you could give me an answer regarding some sound that I recently hear from the front passenger side portion of my sienna 05 whenever there is a strong wind that hits the car especially on the highway. If so it is fixable?
#4806 of 5227
- by dudleyr
Apr 15, 2009 (11:11 am)
Reply
I wound up buying the Sienna over the Odyssey even though I thought the Odyssey drove better and had better passenger accommodations. This was back in 05.
 
Three main reasons were.
 
1 Wife wanted a DVD player and it was an option on the LE Sienna. To get it on the Odyssey you needed an EX-L and then you had to add the DVD. Upshot was the Ody cost $2,500 more (yes it had a little more content, but stuff we didn't want/need) In this case Toyotas weird options worked out better for us.
 
2 We were a little concerned about reliability as it was a first year model and the previous years were only average on CR.
 
3 Nearest Honda Dealer was about 200 miles away.
 
I did get an Accord though for myself for almost the opposite reasons.
 
Toyotas goofy options meant I could not get a stick without a sunroof, which in turn meant I could not fit.
 
The Accord has excellent reliability (dealer distance less of an issue) and the Camry was a first year model this time.
 
I Enjoy both vehicles.

Messages Page 481 of 523
1
...
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
...
523
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement