Sign In Join 



Ford Ranger Prices Paid and Buying Experiences

67 messages,  Last post on Dec 17, 2008 at 6:54 AM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Ford Ranger, Truck


Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#48 of 67
Thinking of getting a new Ranger.... by mookie2003
Jan 28, 2007 (9:42 am)
Reply
I'm thinking about getting a 2006 Ranger (incentives are super right now for that model). XL, auto, AC - other than that, pretty simple. Pulliam Ford in Columbia SC quoted me a MSRP of $18500 and an internet price of $18,300 pre-rebates - that still seems high to me!! Any feedback would be appreciated.
 
Also, I posted a question on the performance vs mileage of the 2.3L and 3.0L on the "engine" forum - if you have any ideas, please let me know!
#49 of 67
Re: Thinking of getting a new Ranger.... [mookie2003] by cogswellcog
Jan 29, 2007 (10:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mookie2003 (Jan 28, 2007 9:42 am)

I just got an 06 XLT SuperCab 4-dr w/ tow and cruise for $18995 before rebates here in Seattle if that helps. Super great deal. But for an XL with auto and AC, (1k for auto and 850 for AC), it should run around 17K at invoice based on what I have seen during the past month I was looking. Invoice on these trucks has been around $1500 to $2000 under MSRP when you factor dealer holdback and the like.
 
For a great research tool while looking at Ford Truck, hit http://www.fordvehicles.com/trucks/ranger/
and click on "search dealer inventory" to see what the local dealer has. You can even see the window sticker with MSRP (from Ford) and options for that truck. Hope this helps.
 
BTW, on the 2.3L vs. 3.0L question; I've had both and the economy on the 2.3L is great (23-25mpg typical). The 3.0L isn't worth the waste in gas for performance. It lacks any real power, (acts much like the 4 banger) and only averaged 18mpg for either city or hwy. I have the 4.0L now and see the same mileage with way better performance for 17mpg so far.
#50 of 67
Re: Ford Ranger: Prices Paid and Buying Experiences [lee_w] by fordenvy
Feb 05, 2007 (10:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lee_w (Aug 01, 2004 1:08 pm)

Rangers are dinosaurs, but look at the junk yards what do you see. Imports, they make up >50% of the junk Yards.
#51 of 67
Re: Ford Ranger: Prices Paid and Buying Experiences [fordenvy] by bri66
Feb 09, 2007 (8:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: fordenvy (Feb 05, 2007 10:09 pm)

Dinosaurs yes, but would not even consider buying anything but. Are people paying invoice to own? My first 1983 Ranger 4x4 2.3l drove it for over 11 years, 250k + sold it to my brother for $1K and could have got more if it wasn't my brother. Bought a 1994 Ranger 4x4 4.0l and my son is still driving it with 295K miles and going strong. Only complaint was the auto 4x4 push button crapp, should have kept it manual hubs with a shift on the floor. I'm going to be buying my third Ranger in a few months, won't even consider taking another make for a test drive. Yes sir I will stick with the brand I trust the most. My current vehicles are a 1966 Mustang, 1994 Ranger, 2001 Escape, 2004 Freestar(...wifes), and last but not least my 2007 GT 500 Shelby. P.S. Ford did not pay me to post this message, nor am I affiliated in any way with Ford. HA! HA! Although I think they should give me a few shares.
#52 of 67
Re: Ford Ranger: Prices Paid and Buying Experiences [bri66] by kyfdx HOST
Feb 09, 2007 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: bri66 (Feb 09, 2007 8:16 am)

Ford shares? Better get any payment in cash!!
#53 of 67
Re: Ford Ranger: Prices Paid and Buying Experiences [kyfdx] by bri66
Feb 09, 2007 (8:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Feb 09, 2007 11:29 am)

What Ford should do is demand half of the mark-up premiums the dealerships are charging for their Shelby's and GT Mustangs. That would right the ship. HA! HA! They are having problems, but they will come through it with no problem.
#54 of 67
Four Cylinder by fordenvy
Mar 09, 2007 (12:57 am)
Reply
Ford may claim they have the most fuel efficient pickup, but they sacrifice more then its worth. That engine won't pull a greasy string out of cats butt hole. Forget about the A/C, turn it on you'll be doing 3000rpm rolling backwards. I traded that in for the 4.0 V6, much better, also forget about the 3.0 also. The 4.0 is the only engine that makes the truck worth anything.
#55 of 67
my 1998 spash 3.o manuelxlt extended cab by cessna180
Mar 20, 2007 (6:16 pm)
Reply
contrary to previuos message,, and of course depending on how ya use,.... or abuse it,, this is an excellent tight,... quiet,... plenty of power,... great on gas , very comfortable,.... well built twin cities,... p/u,.. the 3.o v-6 severs its designed, intention, again,,, its all in how you maintain,... and treat the thing,,
#56 of 67
Third Ranger Purchased by bri66
Apr 03, 2007 (11:07 pm)
Reply
Well, I couldn't hold off any longer and took advantage of Ford rebates on left over 06 inventory. Bought the 06 2-dr 4x4 extended cab FX4 model. MSRP was $24,660 Ford rebated $3,000 and dealer took off additional $1,600. Final cost before adding premium bump to bumper $20,060. I am very happy with deal and believe I will have for many years. 1983 Ranger 200,000+ miles, 1994 Ranger 297,000+ miles and still going strong. The Ranger maybe outdated to some other truck makers, but I will take ol reliable USA anyday.

Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement