Sign In Join 



Acura RDX

2722 messages,  Last post on Sep 25, 2009 at 12:58 PM

You are in the Acura RDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura RDX, Concept Cars, SUV


Messages Page 4 of 273
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
273
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 2722
more RDX info from Corporate by l943973
Dec 17, 2004 (6:43 am)
Reply
From HondaNews.com
 
"Acura RD-X Concept Debuts at North American International Auto Show
  
DETROIT 12/16/2004 -- The Acura RD-X Concept vehicle will make its debut at the 2005 North American International Auto Show in Detroit. This concept version of the upcoming Acura entry SUV, which will go on sale in 2006, combines the performance of a sports sedan with the versatility and utility of a premium SUV.
 
Aimed at active urban professionals and packed full of performance and technology, the RD-X Concept is designed to knife through traffic on crowded city streets and carve up twisty mountain roads. It features aggressive styling, a wide track, bold fender flares and a unique wood and leather interior based on the feeling of an upscale loft apartment.
 
Additional details on the RD-X Concept will be announced on Sunday, Jan. 9th at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. "
 
additonal images available at
http://hondanews.com/CatID3046?mid=2004121646719&mime=asc&amp- ;archives=t
#32 of 2722
RDX is a bad Name by lumber2
Dec 26, 2004 (8:52 am)
Reply
RDX is a bad name for anything.
RDX is a type of Explosive!
 
http://www.ordnance.org/rdx.htm
#33 of 2722
Re: RDX is a bad Name [lumber2] by dewey
Dec 26, 2004 (9:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lumber2 (Dec 26, 2004 8:52 am)

Nothing wrong with explosive performance, unless you are trying to avoid getting speeding tickets.
#34 of 2722
Re: RDX is a bad Name [dewey] by ksoman
Dec 30, 2004 (7:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Dec 26, 2004 9:26 pm)

or the goverment could ban the vehicle because the name fails airport security rules... if you own a Honda RDX, you are not allowed within 20 miles of the airport... hehehe.
 
ksso
#35 of 2722
by dewey
Jan 05, 2005 (11:36 am)
Reply
http://autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=101529
 
Based on above site, there will not be a hybrid RDX. In fact there will not be a hybrid SUV from Honda in the next three years!
#36 of 2722
Re: [dewey] by raychuang00
Jan 05, 2005 (8:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Jan 05, 2005 11:36 am)

Based on above site, there will not be a hybrid RDX. In fact there will not be a hybrid SUV from Honda in the next three years!
 
Mind you, it may not BE necessary for a hybrid SUV from Honda. Thanks to Variable Cylinder Management and the likely application of direct fuel injection and stratified combustion starting with the 2007 model year, the Acura RDX could actually get the same or better fuel efficiency than the current Honda Accord sedan with the K24 2.4-liter I-4 engine.
#37 of 2722
by varmint
Jan 06, 2005 (10:52 am)
Reply
Doing the math with both the HAH and the 2005 Odyssey, it looks like VCM is good for a boost of approximately 5% in the city cycle and 12-13% on the highway. Using similar-sized vehicles like the Highlander and VUE as a basis, I guesstimate that a 3.0L CR-V or RDX would get about 20-28 mpg when equipped with VCM.
#38 of 2722
by robertsmx
Jan 06, 2005 (12:29 pm)
Reply
Non-VCM 3.0/V6 in RDX (or CR-V) could deliver 20/28 mpg if gearing isn’t any shorter than the same in Accord. With VCM, another 1-2 mpg in city, and 2-3 mpg on highway should be possible.
 
With hybrid option (on top of the V6), I would expect another 25% (city) and 15% (highway) gain which could make for the compact SUV to be rated something like 27/35 mpg.
#39 of 2722
Re: [robertsmx] by varmint
Jan 06, 2005 (2:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: robertsmx (Jan 06, 2005 12:29 pm)

"Non-VCM 3.0/V6 in RDX (or CR-V) could deliver 20/28 mpg if gearing isn’t any shorter than the same in Accord."
 
How do you figure?
 
I suppose if the CR-V or RDX stays the same size and weight, that would be possible, but I don't have high hopes for that scenario. With a V6 under the hood, Honda will probably have to move to a more robust transmission, and it's likely the vehicle will be based on a variant of the Global Mid-size platform. (I'm thinking Elysion.)
 
That would fit the trend we're seeing with small SUVs not being so small any more.
 
Saturn VUE 3,641 lbs and 19/25 mpg
Santa Fe 3,946 lbs and 17/21 mpg
Chevy Equinox 3,775 lbs and 19/25 mpg
 
That's getting pretty close to the V6 Highlander with AWD and a 3rd row of seats (3935 lbs 18/24 mpg). Toyota's 3.3L engine is no slouch when it comes to fuel economy and would be a reasonable match to Honda's 3.0L. The VUE's 3.5L engine and 5AT are Honda products.
 
The Accord, which is lighter than any of these SUVs, only gets 21 mpg in city driving as a FWD model. On the highway, its vastly superior aerodynamics give it a big advantage.
 
Don't mean to be contrary. Just explaining why I think 20 mpg is about all we'll see for city driving.
#40 of 2722
by l943973
Jan 07, 2005 (6:39 am)
Reply
RDX is an appropriate name if the crossover is suppose to handle like an RSX but be versatile like an MDX. Lets just hope it isn't a rebadged CRV.

Messages Page 4 of 273
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
273
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement