Sign In Join 



Acura RDX

2722 messages,  Last post on Sep 25, 2009 at 12:58 PM

You are in the Acura RDX Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Acura RDX, Concept Cars, SUV


Messages Page 268 of 273
1
...
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
...
273
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2668 of 2722
Re: 87 Octane Acceptable? [ptd1] by wwest
Jun 17, 2008 (9:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: ptd1 (Jun 17, 2008 6:45 am)

"Denver at 6500 ft. where the octane is not so important."
 
The primary difference at 6500 ft (Denver, 6500 ft...??) is that even at WOT the cylinder will NEVER get a full "charge", a full fill of A/F mixture, therefore almost never encounter engine knock/ping due to low octane, even in a relatively high compression engine.
 
But at higher elevations it is even more important to match premium fuel with a high compression engine in order to keep the engine performance, HP/torque, within "reason" and thereby avoid the continuous downshifts that results.
 
But other than the "nuisense" of the too often downshifts there will be no adverse results.
#2669 of 2722
Re: downshifts [wwest] by suvsearcher1
Jun 18, 2008 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (May 31, 2008 9:21 am)

Maybe you are right, but it is sometimes annoying when it downshifts abruptly like that. I have a 2008 RDX and for first 5000 miles or so I did not notice the downshift but I have been noticing it often nowdays on the local higways when I am driving between 45 and 50 mph. It feels as if the engine is cut off and it has downshifted from 5th gear to 3 or something.
The 5 speed transmission is also not that smooth as I had wished. But otherwise its a good car and handles very well.
#2670 of 2722
Re: downshifts [suvsearcher1] by ptd1
Jun 18, 2008 (1:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: suvsearcher1 (Jun 18, 2008 7:42 am)

I'd love to get more info on the downshift issue. They "reset" the grade logic module on mine. It got better for a while. But it is again "learning" when it thinks it should downshift in anticipation of a downhill grade. Its getting dumber in stead of smarter!
 
If I come over a rise in the highway and just tap the brake to release the cruise, it downshifts... and other times too (approaching a curve when I decell... very annoying... bad for fuel economy, and can't do much for the life of the trans either.
Acura has no tweak at this time.
#2671 of 2722
2007 RDX by edr10
Jun 18, 2008 (3:21 pm)
Reply
I just recently bought a 2007 RDX but was not able to aford it with Navigation, does anyone know if i could purchase the navigation for it and have them install it in the near future?
#2672 of 2722
Re: 2007 RDX [edr10] by bodble2
Jun 18, 2008 (5:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: edr10 (Jun 18, 2008 3:21 pm)

I would just buy an aftermarket, portable unit instead. There are tons of good choices out there now, and all are way cheaper than a factory unit.
#2673 of 2722
Re: downshifts [ptd1] by wwest
Jun 19, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: ptd1 (Jun 18, 2008 1:02 pm)

The automatic transaxle designers are simply trying to emulate what you might do if driving a stick, a FWD or F/AWD with a "stick". With a FWD or F/AWD vehicle they dare not inadvertently create an instance that results in a not insignificant level of engine compression braking. Therefore NO downshifts simply as a result of throttle "lift"(***).
 
But...
 
Touch the brakes, even ever so lightly...
 
And you have not only just "told" the engine/transaxle ECU that you wish to slow to a lower speed, you have also "told" the ECU that in your "view" the roadbed traction is high enough for braking, primarily FRONT braking.
 
So if the "grade logic" indicates that just before brake application the vehicle was gaining more speed than would indicate a level roadbed the engine/transaxle ECU will command a downshift when you "touch" the brakes.
 
Try using the e-brake as a temporary trial to avoid the downshifts.
 
I am continually puzzled as to why so many dealers think reseting the ECU would result in a long term fix for these problems, it CANNOT.
 
Keep in mind, with FWD or F/AWD it can be HAZARDOUS to downshift the transaxle BLINDLY, absent knowing the roadbed conditions insofar as traction is concerned. ABS can and will RELEASE excessive braking HP at the front wheels if the roadbed conditions are no conducive to same, but in the short term, milliseconds, it cannot CANCEL engine compression braking.
 
"(approaching a curve when I decel..."
 
I hope, like to think, you meant to say "approaching a downhill curve, or approaching a curve directly from a downhill slope.."
 
If the RDX transaxle downshifts on a "level" curve as you describe then the grade logic is flawed.
 
The default transaxle "action" in a FWD or F/AWD with throttle lift, even the slightest lift, is to upshift IMMEDIATELY. Downshifting, or even remaining in a lower gear ratio just previously being used for acceleration, can easily result in loss of control should the roadbed traction be questionable.
 
Toyota & Lexus are currently encountering HUGE problems surrounding this very issue. Back late in the last century in order to put a relatively large V6 engine and ROBUST transaxle in tandem SIDEWAYS in the upcoming RX300 they eliminated a few transaxle components they THOUGHT to be not important.
 
Wrong..!!
#2674 of 2722
Re: 2007 RDX [bodble2] by edr10
Jun 19, 2008 (3:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Jun 18, 2008 5:43 pm)

Bodle2 -- any GPS that you would recomend??
#2675 of 2722
Re: 2007 RDX [edr10] by bodble2
Jun 19, 2008 (3:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: edr10 (Jun 19, 2008 3:49 pm)

I've got a NUVI 350 which I find quite good. Only negatives for me are, the street names pronunciation can be a bit off at times, and the volume has to be turned up almost to max if the ambient noise level is high. But there are so many choices now. TOMTOM makes some good ones. And 4.3" screen models are coming down in price if you prefer a larger screen.
#2676 of 2722
Extended Warranty for 2008 RDX w/Tech by monkeybaronjr
Jun 19, 2008 (4:00 pm)
Reply
Hey all,
 
I was wondering if anyone has opted to get any type of extended warranty for their RDX. I am just under 6000 miles (the max to get the cheap Warranty Direct deal). Therefore, if I'm going to purchase it, I need to do it soon.
 
Other than the 54 RDX's with bad turbos at 50,000 miles, has anyone seen or heard of any long term reliability issues that would make an extended warranty a good financial decision?
 
Thanks everybody.
#2677 of 2722
Re: Extended Warranty for 2008 RDX w/Tech [monkeybaronjr] by tidester HOST
Jun 19, 2008 (7:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: monkeybaronjr (Jun 19, 2008 4:00 pm)

You may be interested in Extended Warranties while you're waiting for a reply here.
 
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper

Messages Page 268 of 273
1
...
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
...
273
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement