Sign In Join 



Is Ethanol good for the environment?

165 messages,  Last post on Sep 24, 2008 at 5:25 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 4 of 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 165
Re: It gets worse [gagrice] by electrictroy
Feb 08, 2005 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 28, 2004 10:09 pm)

STUDIES:
http://www.ethanol.org/pdfs/energy_balance_ethanol.pdf
http://www.ethanol.org/pdfs/energy_balance_ethanol.pdf
http://www.carbohydrateeconomy.org/library/admin/uploadedfiles/Ho- w_Much_Energy_Does_it_Take_to_Make_a_Gallon_.html
 
HIGHLIGHTS
"U.S. Department of Agriculture, July 2002. This study analyzes many of the previous studies on the energy balance of producing ethanol. The conclusion by the study's authors is that there is 34% more energy in a gallon of ethanol than it takes to produce it."
"Michigan State University, May 2002. This comprehensive, independent study funded by MSU shows that there is 56% more energy in a gallon of ethanol than it takes to produce it."
 
troy
#32 of 165
Re: It gets worse [electrictroy] by electrictroy
Feb 08, 2005 (9:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: electrictroy (Feb 08, 2005 9:15 am)

"Cornell's Pimental found that 131,000 BTUs are needed to make one gallon of ethanol, and one gallon of ethanol has an energy value of 77,000 BTUs, so there is a net energy loss of 54,000 BTUs"
 
.
 
Sounds like Hydrogen. H2 has the same flaw, but people ignore it.
 
Anyway, I find it difficult to believe ethanol results in a 54,000 BTU loss. Ethanol plants are basically *solar cells* absorbing free energy from the sun. Surely having liquified solar energy is beneficial?
 
troy
#33 of 165
Re: It gets worse [electrictroy] by gagrice
Feb 08, 2005 (12:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: electrictroy (Feb 08, 2005 9:16 am)

Surely having liquified solar energy is beneficial?
 
I think they consider it a wash because it absorbs as much CO2 as it creates when used as fuel.
#34 of 165
by electrictroy
Feb 09, 2005 (12:19 pm)
Reply
Um, yeah, but my point is that we're getting "free energy" from the sun. Ethanol is like liquified solar. How is that bad?
 
troy
#35 of 165
Brazil by yerth10
Feb 09, 2005 (1:37 pm)
Reply
http://wardsauto.com/ar/auto_brazils_flexfuel_cars/index.htm
 
22 % of vehicles sold in Brazil in 2004 had Flex-fuel and this may increase to 50 % in 2005. Great.
 
Their flex-fuel has both
Bi-Fuel (gasolene/Ethanol)
and
Tri-Fuel (gasolene/Ethanol/Natural-gas)
 
Brazil is also #2 in CNG usage.
 
As for the energy input/output ratio, if it consumes more input, then combined with the labor, it will cost double that of gasolene,
but it costs only 10 - 15 % more which is also because of low sales volume.
 
I am sure that Ethanol delivers more energy than what it consumes to produce and in Cane-based Ethanol output is even more. As gas prices increase, expect more vehicles even in USA.
Hey, Indonesia which is a long time OPEC member has become a net oil-importer last year and plans to pull out of that cartel.
#36 of 165
Why in Trucks by yerth10
Mar 23, 2005 (10:10 am)
Reply
www.greencarcongress.com
 
Its good to sell vehicles running on E85, but why is GM always putting such technology in trucks.
 
An average truck driver may never know about E85 and will not search for a station vending that fuel.
 
GM can bring it in a smaller vehicle like Cobalt, Equinox, etc.
#37 of 165
Why in Trucks ? Simple Answer by electrictroy
Mar 24, 2005 (10:10 am)
Reply
The places where E85 is available (north-central U.S.) are mostly farmers who drive trucks. So that's why the technology is aimed at trucks.
 
Troy
#38 of 165
Re: Why in Trucks [yerth10] by gagrice
Mar 24, 2005 (10:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: yerth10 (Mar 23, 2005 10:10 am)

GM can bring it in a smaller vehicle like Cobalt, Equinox, etc.
 
They would never sell to the public. They average about 25% lower mileage than normal gas engines. I am sure it is more expensive and not readily available. It is cleaner and less GHG. If you want a small car that gets good mileage on an alternate fuel, go with the VW TDI and Biodiesel or the Honda Civic GX that runs on CNG. CNG cars are the Cleanest on the planet. Maybe even cleaner than electric vehicles if you have to use electricity generated with coal or fuel oil.
#39 of 165
Ethanol is cheaper by yerth10
Mar 24, 2005 (10:54 am)
Reply
http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/e85toolkit/e85_fuel.html
 
E85 costs $1.49 / gallon in this webpage. Even it has only 4/5 the energy of gasoline, it should cost 4/5*2.1 = $1.68. So it is 18 cents cheaper.
 
The gas price shown in the board is definitely older as they show lower price of gas.
#40 of 165
Re: Ethanol is cheaper [yerth10] by gagrice
Mar 24, 2005 (11:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: yerth10 (Mar 24, 2005 10:54 am)

Even it has only 4/5 the energy of gasoline, it should cost 4/5*2.1 = $1.68.
 
It has about 3/4 the energy of unleaded gas. So the break even amount would be if the fuel sells for 25% less. The real kicker is the fact that it is very expensive & dangerous to transport. If you are in the area of an Ethanol plant the price is reasonable. The amount that is added to the CA gas is one of the factors making our gas the most expensive in the nation. I think it is about 11% that is added to our gas. I noticed my mileage on the last trip to Las Vegas in the Lexus was about 1 mpg better on the return trip with a fill-up in Vegas.

Messages Page 4 of 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement