Sign In Join 



Is Ethanol good for the environment?

165 messages,  Last post on Sep 24, 2008 at 5:25 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 12 of 18
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#102 of 165
Myth-busting with actual peer-reviewed work by boilermaker2
Mar 28, 2006 (2:53 pm)
Reply
USDA Energy Balance Study
 
Greenhouse gas issue bebunked (from Berkely no less)
UC Berkely News
 
OOOOOOh, now (THE Journal) SCIENCE weighs in...
Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
 
I'll let you guess how long it took to find some actual, factual, information thanks to Google.
 
Cheers,
Boiler
#103 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [gagrice] by highender
Mar 30, 2006 (8:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 27, 2006 11:33 am)

hello gagrice:
 
I just stumbled onto this thread....good to hear you have been boning up on alternative fuels....
 
so what is the low down now on ethanol ? I have seen many GM ads in magazines touting the yellow cars and this fuel.
 
IS it something that can provide an alternative while a permanent fuel replacement is found ? OR is it like the Prius...costing more in money & fuel upfront , and thus not a real cost effective idea ?
 
cheers !
#104 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [highender] by gagrice
Mar 30, 2006 (10:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: highender (Mar 30, 2006 8:33 pm)

It may have a very limited audience in the midwest. They will run out of corn long before they make a dent in the fossil fuel usage. It still takes as much energy to grow and distill as you gain. It would be a dead monkey if not for the subsidies. CA is getting screwed as usual. It costs too much to bring what is needed just for oxygenation.
#105 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [highender] by snakeweasel
Mar 31, 2006 (6:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: highender (Mar 30, 2006 8:33 pm)

Its just not cost effective. Even with its lower cost (which is subsidized) its not as cost effective as 100% gasoline due to the fact that on average a car will get 25% less mileage.
#106 of 165
waiting to see by rwh
Mar 31, 2006 (7:10 am)
Reply
I'm not sure of the future of E85 and acknowledge the decline in mileage. However, I think people should at least consider the possibility that the $2.50/gal we're currently paying for gas may seem cheap a few years from now. It's quite possible we could be paying $4 or $5 per gallon gas fairly soon. Alot of it has to do with the future level of economic growth in Asia, particularly China and India. If this happens, ethanol becomes more and more viable.
 
What I have not heard discussed on this board is the potential switch from corn to switchgrass. A study out of Auburn University in Alabama which I heard on NPR right after the State of the Union Address indicated switchgrass produces 4 gallons of ethanol for every one gallon's worth of energy used to produce it, compared to a ratio of 2.5 to 1 for corn. Given that switchgrass is native, grows well in a larger area of the country, requires far less intensive management, holds the soil better and would generally be better for the environment than corn, it has potential to become a major crop.
#107 of 165
Re: waiting to see [rwh] by gagrice
Mar 31, 2006 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: rwh (Mar 31, 2006 7:10 am)

Ethanol from Cellulose (e.g. switchgrass or corn stover)
The energy balance from corn, then, is slightly positive. However, ethanol can also be derived from another source, namely, cellulosic feedstocks such as corn stover or switchgrass. In this case, the energy balance is much improved, as shown in Table 1 of this paper by McLaughlin and Walsh. Their data show that while the energy gain from corn grain is 21%, the energy gain from converting switchgrass to ethanol is 343%! The downside, of course, is that conversion technologies are not ready for primetime yet, as shown in the the USDA-DOE study mentioned above--the cost per gallon of ethanol from cellulose fermentation is about $1.50.
 
The main worry here is that corn stover will be promoted as the cellulose source, rather than perennial grasses, and that's a big concern. Growing corn is already an environmental problem, but removing all stover (analgous to harvesting corn silage--but that's another topic!) will really leave the land open to wind and water erosion. All this adds up to the fact that using perennail grass crops, such as switchgrass, makes environment sense. More work on conversion technologies is needed, but when it is available, it will mark a substantial advance over the current corn ethanol industry.

 
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~brummer/ag/biomass2.htm
#108 of 165
Ethanol from Cellulose by jeffyscott
Mar 31, 2006 (12:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 31, 2006 8:39 am)

Now that sounds like something that makes sense, if it really can result in more than 3 times the energy inputs.
 
What about the acreage needed? For corn I think it works out to be something like the entire land area of the US would need to be planted with corn to generate enough ethanol...is this figure better for switchgrass?
#109 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [snakeweasel] by highender
Mar 31, 2006 (5:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: snakeweasel (Mar 31, 2006 6:14 am)

Hi snake and gagrice:
 
sounds like we would be spending much money upfront, interms of water and other resources...and then getting less mileage out of each gallon ? That does not sound like it is a real good solution. Almost like spending money to save money?
 
I remember once using $3 of gas to save $2 for filling the whole tank of gas...stupid of me....
#110 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [highender] by gagrice
Mar 31, 2006 (6:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: highender (Mar 31, 2006 5:24 pm)

It is still pretty much a Midwestern crop. Limited realistic market. I sure don't care for the gas formulas we get stuck with in CA. Is Ethanol another MTBE boondoggle? I get the distinct feeling we are all be used as guinea pigs by CARB & the EPA.
#111 of 165
Re: E85 emissions [gagrice] by boilermaker2
Apr 01, 2006 (2:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 31, 2006 6:11 pm)

I am surprised that none of you have mentioned that Brazil will not have to import ANY more fuel this fall. I believe it was on the one of the networks earlier this week. They have been working on this for over 20 years to give themselves energy independence. ALL of there gas pumps have used E10 for years (decades). Now, E85 and E100 is the norm and E10 is the odd man out (just the opposite here).
 
Now you can pooh-pooh all day long about how they are only the 5th most populous country in the world and how nobody drives cars down there but that doesn't hold water. They've turned off the tap. They won't be competing with China and India for energy...they will be selling it to them (we can't truck ethanol easily here but BRAZIL can seas barge it?).
 
I will agree with gagrice that more pumps need to get out to justify the purchase of an E85 vehicle. I will also agree that the way we are creating our fuel needs to be improved, expanded and updated.
 
You cannot tell me we cannot do it. We've been aced by a country known for Rio, beaches, thongs and rainforests. While it hurts, it should be a heads-up to a country that can put men on the moon.
 
It's just been too easy to import the liquid gold and too much work to grow it ourselves. Then again, the third world is always ready to sell to fat & lazy americans.
 
Cheers,
Boiler

Messages Page 12 of 18
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement