You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
The Great Hybrid Battery Debate

669 messages, Last post on Apr 06, 2009 at 2:32 PM
You are in the Hybrid Vehicles Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 02, 2009 1:01 pm) I agree. Then I would never lease a vehicle. It is a giant rip-off unless you can write the whole thing off. This preacher hardly makes enough in a year to pay any taxes. He leased as it was $200 per month less and he was planning to finance the payoff after 5 years. Why he likes the rough riding noisy little beast is beyond me. But he likes it. I feel for him and would loan him the $24k except he cannot make that big of a payment if I did not charge him any interest for 5 years. No wonder I despise lending companies almost as much as our Congress and government. |
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Apr 04, 2009 7:08 pm) The cost of the vehicle is a moot point: the lease is what is referred to as a "sunk cost", which has to be paid, and it would be much cheaper to simply pay the 24K and drive the vehicle, rather than 1. Risk having the battery go bad and have to replace or pay for it at the end of the lease. Yes, HE would have to pay because he did not treat the car appropriately, and cars need to be driven. 2. Paying lease payments on top of whatever transportation costs the minister has in HI. Actually, the car payments may not be bad if he goes with a 60 month payout - possibly similar to the lease payments.
|
|
|
Replying to: stevedebi (Apr 06, 2009 7:21 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
The Great Hybrid Battery Debate
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats