Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Saab 9-3 Prices Paid and Buying Experience
653 messages, Last post on Nov 19, 2009 at 7:04 AM
You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx
|
Replying to: pengwin (Dec 21, 2007 3:25 pm) Can you tell me where are you located? What color is the exterior/interior? The $25k OTD sounds like a good deal. I got a quote for $26k OTD on a 07 2.0T sedan with smoke beige exterior and beige interior. Automatic, moonroof, and cold weather package. I was ready to go sign the purchase papers tomorrow until I saw your posting. Please let me know your location and if you did buy the car at $25k OTD. Thanks.
|
|
|
Replying to: gunrabbit (Dec 25, 2007 11:13 pm) |
|
|
|
|
waterdr "Saabs depreciate faster then any car on the planet in the first few years, then they seem to slow down, because "it's a Saab." Take into account that your $"32k" price tag was really closer to $27,000 to $28,000 with the incentives that were given at the time. The reason that Saabs depreciate so fast is because it is so closely competing against the new car deal. Why would someone buy a year old car for 23k or 24k (and have a $500 payment) when they can either buy a new one at 26-28k or lease a new one at $400-$500? Consumers always want to compare it to sticker and not the price they paid. Thats why is starts to slow down after the first 3 years or so.
|
|
|
Replying to: eurospecialist (Dec 27, 2007 11:14 am) The clincher with Saab is that they offer better warranties on the used ones then on new ones which is not the case with other makes. I am not against buying new.....in fact, I just did purchase a new car. But stictly financially speaking, buying used is always smarter. But, leasing changes things. The payment does not tell the whole story. But, it is America, and that is all 99% of the consumers seem to care about. If someone looks at a car like a rental and wants to get rid of it every two years, then leasing is the only option. The last point about Saabs is that once they get some age on them, they seem to actually hold their value better then most other brands. At least what I see where I live is that no matter of miles, if it is a clean 4WD or a Saab, they seem to always get money. But for someone leasing, why should they care. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: waterdr (Dec 27, 2007 11:34 am) And most all the manufactures offer better certified pre-owned warranties than they do new (most all have 6yr/100k certified used and 4yr/50k new). The idea is to give the dealers as many reason to buy them when they come off lease so the manufacturer doesn't have to take their beating sending them to the auctions. I will agree with you that MOST of the time it make much more fiscal sense to buy used than new, but there are exceptions to very rule.
|
|
| The unasked question here is"depreciate compared to what?".Your statement has to have a context.All cars depreciate much more precipitously in the first 3 years.This is the basic rationale behind leasing as a financial option.Another component of resale value is market supply and demand.Saabs account for less than 1/4 of 1% of all cars sold in the U.S.A. and have proportionately less demand in the used car market thus impacting negatively on re-sale value. | |
|
Replying to: eurospecialist (Dec 27, 2007 4:55 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Saab 9-3 Prices Paid and Buying Experience
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Saab 9-3
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
