You are here: Forums Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Saab 9-3 Prices Paid and Buying Experience

Saab 9-3 Prices Paid and Buying Experience

652 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 8:43 AM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Saab 9-3, Convertible, Sedan

 

Messages Page 20 of 66 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 66 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#184 of 652 Re: 1999 9-3 value with a brand new dealer installed engine [jay45] by kyfdx HOST Sep 04, 2005 (12:33 pm)
Replying to: jay45 (Sep 04, 2005 9:39 am) You might have better luck posting here:   Real World Trade-In Values   regards, kyfdx Replies to this message: jay45 (Sep 06, 2005 7:57 am)
#185 of 652 Re: 1999 9-3 value with a brand new dealer installed engine [kyfdx] by jay45 Sep 06, 2005 (7:57 am)
Replying to: kyfdx (Sep 04, 2005 12:33 pm) Tried that but nobody replied there either... thanks tho'
#186 of 652 '04 Aero Convertible vs '06 2.0T Convertile by ed108 Sep 20, 2005 (1:44 pm)
Saw an '04 Certified Aero Convertible wiith all options except NAV and 14K miles, asking $39K at local dealer, TMV of $36/39K (uncertified/certified) on Edmunds. Then I see that a new '06 with auto trans, premium pkg and cold weather pkg is TMV of $40,400.   Same 210 HP engine on both of them, leather seats on both, most of the same options. '04 Aero does have Onstar, two tone seats, the backup sensors and a few other options that I don't see even listed for the '06 2.0T, but mainly options I wouldn't even notice are missing as I don't need onstar and can parallel park on my own without my car beeping at me.   So at the end of the day it seems to me like the Aero of '04/'05 has been rebadged the 2.0T of '06 and costs just $1400 more than a 2 year old version of itself. Am I missing something here?
#187 of 652 Saab '06 2.0T Anyone bought one yet by schoup Oct 06, 2005 (3:35 pm)
I'm looking at 9-3 2.0T vs Volvo S40 and just wanted to get an if anyone who has bought an '06 9-3 could tell me what they paid. I like the 9-3 but I'm now leaning towards the Volvo S40 right now becasue of the $1500 in incentives and the depreciation is less at years 1-5 which means better RV /resale value. Saab's poor RV kind of scares me....I'm not going to be upside down on the car. The dealer starting talking about this total value promise by GM(Saab). I told the dealer..Saab lowered it's prices and added some std features that use to be options but if Volvo and Audi are offering incentives and they have better resale value/lower depreciation your going to get killed in the market. The Saab dealer is going to have to go significantly lower than the number I can get the S40 for to make up for that high depreciation. I told him to call when he has a legitimate purchase price.
#188 of 652 depreciation by dhanley Oct 06, 2005 (4:32 pm)
Since saab cut prices so much, depreciation should be lower. A lot of the depreciation was because of the incentives--depreciation is figured from sticker price, so if a car stickers for 40K and there's a 7K incentive, then you sell the car for 20K in 3 years, official deprecaton is $20K even though you lost $13K.
#189 of 652 9-3 vs S40 by r34 Oct 07, 2005 (5:40 am)
If you are lucky, you may be able to get a Saab cheaper than a S40, depending on the trim and options. However, S40 is not really in the same class as 9-3. 9-3 is more closed to S60. Many people were "fooled" by the MSRP price of Saab. I didn't look at Saab until I found out the huge incentive and test drove it. It is the only vehicle I will treat it as my family member. Replies to this message: schoup (Oct 07, 2005 12:06 pm)
#190 of 652 Re: 9-3 vs S40 [r34] by schoup Oct 07, 2005 (12:06 pm)
Replying to: r34 (Oct 07, 2005 5:40 am) For clarification I was talking about the Volvo S40 T5 being equivalent to the Saab 9.3 2.0T. I agree the the base S40 2.4i is not equivalent, it was to the old 9-3 Linear. The S40 T5 with the premium pkg(includes monnroof) vs the 9-3 with premium pkg and moonroof are very comparable in all features
#191 of 652 First time lease by birdboy Oct 09, 2005 (4:45 am)
can someone share with me how or if you can use a trade towards a lease? I have never leased before and have always use my trade towards a new purchase. Howm does it work with leasing?? I would like to find out prior to going to the dealer.Thanks for your help.
#192 of 652 Saab Arc '05 Deal by schoup Oct 15, 2005 (8:25 am)
I was looking at a '05 Arc w/ metallic paint & moonroof MSRP $33,195 (Invoice $31,391). I was quoted $27,399.....that includes $4500 incentive. I countered at $24,400 and he countered at $26,900. At $26,900 that is essentially invoice price minus $4500 incentive. I know he can do better since I when employee pricing was going on I was quoted $27,174 for the same features by another dealer. Back then the incentive was only $3,000. I'm looking at a target price at $25,650. Looking back at old posts I saw the exact same cars sold for $27,000 K and $27,500 in Feb and April so considering this is october I think $25,650 is reasonable, also I'm taking on a huge initial depreciation.   Any thoughts or comments? Replies to this message: snaab1 (Oct 18, 2005 4:00 pm) schoup (Oct 19, 2005 12:04 pm) chaz318 (Oct 22, 2005 6:58 am)
#193 of 652 Re: Saab Arc '05 Deal [schoup] by snaab1 Oct 18, 2005 (4:00 pm)
Replying to: schoup (Oct 15, 2005 8:25 am) Run away from the '05, especially since you are concerned with the initial depreciation. With the revised GM pricing philosophy, the 2006 2.0T is over $4,000 cheaper than a comparable 2005 Arc. I picked up my 2006 2.0T at the end of August with a purchase price of $24,396. I am leasing it for 24 months, 15K per year, for $312 + TTT with no money down (granted, I get the GM employee price, and I had a $500 Saab lease loyalty certificate since I previously had a 2003 9-3). My '06 is really stripped down though - only metallic paint, ReAxs, 5-speed, ACC, and single disc cd - no roof, no heated seats, no fog lights, no Onstar... Minor improvements over the '05 model include the color matched door handles, and much cooler looking stock wheels. You also wrote about the S40 T-5. The Volvo is certainly a nice ride, but there are subtle things about it that I can't get over. For instance, look at an S-40 from the rear next time you see one on the road. You can clearly see the wimpy-looking exhaust, and about half of the gas tank which becomes visibly rusty and corroded after about 1 month. Don't mean to offend any ladies out there, but I have never seen a guy driving an S-40. Total chick car. Replies to this message: schoup (Oct 19, 2005 12:04 pm) chaz318 (Oct 22, 2005 6:58 am)

Messages Page 20 of 66 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 66 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Saab 9-3 Prices Paid and Buying Experience