Biodiesel vehicles - READ ONLY

170 messages, Last post on Jun 30, 2007 at 6:36 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Biodiesel

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 18: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; ...; 18; Prev; Next; Last

#7 of 170 Re: Biodiesel and WVO or SVO [moparbad #5] by rfruth Jun 14, 2004 (1:47 pm)
Replying to: moparbad (May 28, 2004 9:19 am) There isn't enough free used cooking oil / soybean oil for us all but kinda like hybrids bio-diesel is there for those willing to look for it - snip - Ostaszewski: Driving the global economy on french fry oil - Have you seen the price of gas lately? It's more than $2 a gallon. Two dollars! What do those big, heartless oil companies think they are selling us? Bottled water? Milk? http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/columnists/view.bg?articleid=70- - 546&format=text
#9 of 170 Does anyone know the emissions profile of biodiesel by bhill2 Jun 28, 2004 (12:17 pm)
I know that biodiesel has advantages over diesel in the emissions department, but how does a diesel engine burning 100% biodiesel compare in emissions to a ULEV or SULEV gasoline engine, or an engine running on CNG? Replies to this message: usbseawolf2000 (Jun 28, 2004 4:45 pm) bhill2 (Jun 30, 2004 12:22 pm)
#10 of 170 Re: Does anyone know the emissions profile of biodiesel [bhill2 #9] by usbseawolf2000 Jun 28, 2004 (4:45 pm)
Replying to: bhill2 (Jun 28, 2004 12:17 pm) EPA's A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions will help you. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/analysis/biodsl/p02001.pdf Biodiesel reduces Perticle Matter and CO2 but increases more dangerous NOx. 100% biodiesel blend fuel has about 10% less energy than petrol diesel. So, you are looking at energy density of the gasoline. Dennis Replies to this message: bhill2 (Jun 30, 2004 12:22 pm)
#11 of 170 Re: Does anyone know the emissions profile of biodiesel [usbseawolf2000 #10] by bhill2 Jun 30, 2004 (12:22 pm)
Replying to: usbseawolf2000 (Jun 28, 2004 4:45 pm) Thanks, Dennis. Although I didn't closely read all 126 pages of the report you gave the hyperlink to, the table that you included in your post gives a pretty good idea of the answers to my question. The report noted that the data were largely based on pre-1997 heavy-duty highway vehicles (largely semis I imagine)that had few emission control devices (for instance, NOX adsorbers). I wonder if the NOX increase could be prevented with such devices. Since the other pollutants decrease dramatically, and biodiesel is renewable and domestically produced, it might be worth the effort. Bob
#12 of 170 Re: Future fuels Ethanol vs. Biodiesel [moparbad] by john1701a Jul 19, 2004 (6:38 pm)
LOOK AT WHEN THAT ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED. IT IS GROSSLY OUTDATED. AND VERY, VERY, VERY MISLEADING. PERHAPS YOU SHOULD PUBLISH THE FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE. THE ONE STATING HOW MUCH THAT ONE PARTICULAR PLANT HAS CLEANED UP THE SMELL. I drive by that plant on the way to work every day. So there is absolutely nothing you can claim about it that I can't clarify for people. The regulators and the required action was very swift, since ethanol is mandatory in Minnesota. 100% of the gas in the metro area is a mix with gas. And because of that, we are proving the benefits from it... both from cleaner air and the fact that the production has become more efficient. BIODIESEL IS DIRTIER THAN DIESEL, WITH RESPECT TO NOx (SMOG) EMISSIONS. Would you like me to publish a link to the proof of that, again? JOHN
#13 of 170 Future fuels Ethanol vs. Biodiesel by moparbad Jul 19, 2004 (6:06 pm)
Wow, I sure hope that hybrid drivers concerned about emissions are not foolishly burning ethanol blended gasoline! http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/200209/23_losurem_- ethanol/index.shtml VOC's in the news in MN. People making the ethanol choice are contributing to toxic emissions. Other problems with ethanol. Ethanol is highly volatile (increased smog from evaporation of gasoline). Ethanol can not be transported using traditional petro pipelines due to water absortion and separation from gasoline. Requires massive tax subsidies. Requires modifications to existing engines. Biodiesel is not highly volatile. Biodiesel can be transported in the same pipelines as gasoline or diesel. Biodiesel does not require blending and can be used as 100% biodiesel. Biodiesel requires no modifications to existing diesel engines. Biodiesel receives fewer tax subsidies than ethanol. Biodiesel is the smart choice for the fuel to power future vehicles, not ethanol.
#14 of 170 Biodiesel by dhanley Jul 19, 2004 (8:17 pm)
hybrid advantages: 1) Lower Nox and P articulates Diesel advantages: 1) Less greenhouse effect ( esp considering fuel evaporation ) 2) No environmentally questionable battery pack 3) Renewable and net zero greenhouse with biodiesel 4) Established diesel engine longevity. Fuel economy, i think we have to say is a tossup, esp as some reviewers have claimed to have gotten the same MPG out of a prius and an (automatic) mercedes e320CDI--and that's a much bigger, heavier, and faster car. Cost--diesel, it seems. A TDI jetta is cheaper than a civic hybrid when equipped similarly, and honda is admittedly subsidizing the hybrid. Speculating that it will cost massive amounts to clean up potential future emissions standards is double speculation--euro diesel standards are already high, and diesels are cost-effective there. As i don't need a car right now, i can wait a year or two until there's an audi, c-class, or 3-series diesel available here. dave Replies to this message: john1701a (Jul 20, 2004 4:20 am)
#15 of 170 Re: Biodiesel [dhanley] by john1701a Jul 20, 2004 (4:20 am)
Replying to: dhanley (Jul 19, 2004 8:17 pm) > 1) Less greenhouse effect The lack of proof makes this very questionable. Real-World data is required. > 2) No environmentally questionable battery pack Proof that NiMH is both environmentally benign and recyclable has already been provided. > 3) Renewable and net zero greenhouse with biodiesel Since ethanol is a biogas, what's the point? > 4) Established diesel engine longevity. Since Prius is about to begin year 8, this point will lose it's competitive advantage as time goes on. JOHN
#16 of 170 Biodiesel by loveshemp Jul 26, 2004 (1:21 pm)
I bought a 2004 TDI New Beetle and have used 100% biodiesel in it since the first time I filled the tank. I keep a 55 gallon drum of the stuff in my garage. It's easy to buy, delivered the same day I call for it, and easy to use with the little hand-pump I bought for $29. The fuel is non-toxic, non-combustible, and smells good. Best of all, my car runs like a dream. I have the hippest car in town because it doesn't pollute. Check out the emission facts at biodiesel.org if you aren't convinced that this is the fuel of the future. Replies to this message: gagrice (Jul 26, 2004 2:28 pm) kotrba (Mar 04, 2005 9:04 am) gagrice (Mar 04, 2005 9:43 am) bhill2 (Jul 26, 2004 4:16 pm) loveshemp (Jul 27, 2004 1:26 pm) rfruth (Jul 27, 2004 5:11 pm) and 2 more... gem069 (Apr 30, 2006 9:41 am)