You are here: Forums Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Chevrolet Colorado Prices Paid and Buying Experience

Chevrolet Colorado Prices Paid and Buying Experience

46 messages,  Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 9:17 AM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Colorado, Truck

Messages Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#35 of 46 2009 Canyon by catken Oct 02, 2008 (4:09 pm)
Can yoy get a 5speed man. with the 3.7 . Ken
#37 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [poncho167] by jpf Oct 02, 2008 (9:03 pm)
Replying to: poncho167 (Oct 02, 2008 3:42 pm) If you want more proof the Colorado / Canyon are crappy trucks just check out the discussion under Colorado Engine Problems. Engines self-destructing within 30-50 thousand miles does not inspire confidence in these trucks. GM would have been better off updating the S10 / Sonoma. The 4.3 V6 found in these trucks was more durable than the Colorado /Canyon 3.5 or 3.7. Replies to this message: poncho167 (Oct 09, 2008 3:13 pm) fheiser (Jan 04, 2009 6:53 am) jpf (Jan 04, 2009 5:56 pm) poncho167 (Jan 11, 2009 4:39 am) poncho167 (Jan 11, 2009 4:32 am) jfritsch (Jan 12, 2009 8:50 am) 04cad (Jan 13, 2009 7:21 am) and 1 more...
#38 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [jpf] by poncho167 Oct 09, 2008 (3:13 pm)
Replying to: jpf (Oct 02, 2008 9:03 pm) I wouldn't say they are crappy trucks at all. I drive a 1992 S10 that I just can't get rid of and yes I agree that the previous models are more heavy duty, It is a known fact based on the towing, etc. The 4.3 L is probably the most durable V6 ever made and the previous generation 2.5 iron duke and 2.8 V6 which I have were very good as well.   I have driven the Canyon/Colorado's and like them fine. I would get the base four banger. The truck has had some issues for sure with the valve seals and the front suspension but overall its an ok truck. My nephew has a 2005 I5 that has been trouble free. Not all the trucks have defects luckily.
#39 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [jpf] by fheiser Jan 04, 2009 (6:53 am)
Replying to: jpf (Oct 02, 2008 9:03 pm) Well, I think there is good proof now that not all the engine choices are unsound. I am one of the few that plans to buy one of the '09 Colorados with the V8! Gets as good or better (mostly better) mileage than the competion's V6's get. And 300 hp? 0-60 in less than 7 sec.? And let's not forget what just a mild amount of tweaking can do to improve both power and mpg. I am a little turned off by how unrefined the interior is but the truck itself is more than capable and frankly, right now, I would also like to just support an American car manufacturer. Anybody else have any thoughts on the V8? I know most think it's pointless at this time in the economy, but that's part of the reason I'm buying, it might be a fairly rare truck if no one else buys the V8. Replies to this message: jpf (Jan 04, 2009 5:56 pm) poncho167 (Jan 11, 2009 4:39 am) poncho167 (Jan 11, 2009 4:32 am) jfritsch (Jan 12, 2009 8:50 am) 04cad (Jan 13, 2009 7:21 am) jfritsch (Jan 13, 2009 2:42 pm)
#40 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [fheiser] by jpf Jan 04, 2009 (5:56 pm)
Replying to: fheiser (Jan 04, 2009 6:53 am) You may want to compare it with the Dakota (i.e. 0 to 60, etc.). I think you can get the Dakota with a hemi. Good luck. Replies to this message: poncho167 (Jan 11, 2009 4:39 am)
#41 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [fheiser] by poncho167 Jan 11, 2009 (4:32 am)
Replying to: fheiser (Jan 04, 2009 6:53 am) The V8 is really not that bad of a decision mileage wise with this lighter truck to pull around.   With the whole auto industry suffering (not just American) including Toyota's historical downslide, people are being very cautious with unneccessary purchases. I also feel that people are starting to feel guilty by purchasing Japanese vehicles because they are no better than domestic American products in most segments.
#42 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [jpf] by poncho167 Jan 11, 2009 (4:39 am)
Replying to: jpf (Jan 04, 2009 5:56 pm) The Dodge hemi engines are just ok engines. The 440 Magnum engines of the 1960's were Chrysler's prefered engine for racing. The hemi's were unreliable and inefficient. Todays hemi's are much more reliable and efficient but no where as efficient as GM's V8 engines. The hemispherical head design of the hemi is not a good design for mileage.   That V8 engine option in the Colorado will return much better mileage than a Chrysler Hemi.
#43 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [fheiser] by jfritsch Jan 12, 2009 (8:50 am)
Replying to: fheiser (Jan 04, 2009 6:53 am) That is silly, many domestic cars are surpassed in quality by "imports". The UAW and congress forced the "domestics" into a corner and they built large trucks, the only place they could make a profit with huge labor costs. UAW will survive, clipping a lower paid workforce in autos for dues. They are more competitive in heavy equipment and earthmoving equipment plants where their higher salaries are more justifiable.   Years and years of making a profit on trucks, and losing money on all the passenger cars, just keeping up market share.   With 1000's of suppliers everwhere, supplying american workers in "foreign" plants in the south, vs "domestic" in the north, with some auto's (pontiacs vibe and toyota's matrix) actually made in the same plant.   The only thing that distinguishes them is the chrome plastic emblem on the grille and the trunk, and thats probably made in China.   The Colorado is the worst example I know of. Any test drive comparison between the Frontier and Tacoma will put them way out front in all areas, especially for the same price. The Dakota V8 possibly if you have to tow, but it may be too expensive. The Colorado ranks just ahead of the 18 year old Ford Ranger, which isn't saying much. Go with the others even if you have a lot of GM points.   Good luck --jjf Replies to this message: 04cad (Jan 13, 2009 7:21 am) jfritsch (Jan 13, 2009 2:42 pm)
#44 of 46 Re: Colorado Options [jfritsch] by 04cad Jan 13, 2009 (7:21 am)
Replying to: jfritsch (Jan 12, 2009 8:50 am) I guess the UAW and congress forced the imports to build new plants in the U.S. to build their own full size trucks and four wheel drive trucks? Just because the import companies don't have the retiree burden and are more profitable, doesn't make the Big 3 or UAW wrong in having that obligation.    Until the gas companies raised gas prices to $4.00 per gallon, the Big 3, including GM were doing okay. The UAW has given lots of concessions in the last 20 years to try and make the Big 3 more viable, and the quality of domestic vehicles has shot up, surpassing some imports in the same class of vehicle.    GM trucks (GMC and Chevrolet) have outsold all trucks in the U.S. for years and years, they have the best mpg in their class today, for years they have had a very high resale value. Malibu is higher rated than the imports in quality and I believe owner satisfaction?   Canyon and Colorado may have some issues, but if you look at the forums here and elsewhere, their competition have problems also.     Anti-American sentiments about vehicles or other issues are a big part of what is wrong with our economy today. It isn't enough for some people that the UAW and Big 3 have made huge strides in quality, design, mpg, and durability, while still having a living wage, with decent benefits, some people just like to bash American made products and workers.   To those who bash the UAW and it's workers, keep in mind, they have donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the American public over the years through United Way, Christmas donations, thanksgiving food giveaways, gate collections for burn out victims, etc. Replies to this message: jfritsch (Jan 13, 2009 2:42 pm)

Messages Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Chevrolet Colorado Prices Paid and Buying Experience