Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars
418 messages, Last post on Oct 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM
You are in the Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
I don’t understand why car manufacturers aren’t looking into vehicles powered by hydrogen. Not that hydrogen fuel cell bullcrap that everybody is talking about because that doesn’t help our global warming situation at all. It still takes power plants that produce harmful emissions for the hydrogen fuel cell. If manufacturers would build a car that ran on hydrogen gas obtained through electrolysis that would be a true 100% zero emission vehicle. Electrolysis works by running an electrical charge through a series of metal plates submerged in water which separates the hydrogen atoms from the oxygen atom in water. That would mean that all you put into your gas tank is good ole fashioned water, not compressed hydrogen gas that you would most likely have to buy from a Shell, Mobil, BP, or some other oil conglomerate. Stanley Meyers first developed this concept back in the 70’s; he successfully designed and built a car that ran off water. Major car manufacturers got this design from him and were supposed to incorporate that technology into new cars. Well where is it? I haven’t heard anything about it. Everything is Hydrogen fuel cell or hybrid now a days. I believe that it is oil companies trying to keep control of our major mode of transportation. Because if we started buying cars that ran off tap water where would they make their money, they'd be out of luck. I haven’t personally looked at the designs of Mr. Meyers but the concept is simple. Obtain hydrogen gas using electrolysis and somehow meter it into the engine dependent on the throttle position. Hydrogen is highly flammable so it would be sufficient to burn, and you add with the oxygen that comes into the engine through the air intake and what do you have as exhaust? Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Hydrogen; three of earth's most simple and abundant elements. But oil companies are so greedy that they wont allow this to happen, they would rather fatten their already hefty pockets than help save the world. They don’t care about our future generations who will eventually have to deal with the havoc that we have created. They don’t care about global warming or acid rain or anything like that. Do you think that they live in the San Fernando Valley in California where you can’t even see the infamous Hollywood sign because the air is so polluted? Heck no, they could give two craps about that because their children don’t live there and don’t have to suffer with the asthma and other health problem that it causes. Their kids can go outside and play whenever they want because they don’t have to worry about the smog level and if it’s dangerous to their children’s health. But I am getting off subject. I hope that one day the car manufacturers will get their heads out of their rear ends and stop taking hand outs from oil companies and start making hydrogen vehicles. Hybrids were a step in the right direction but they are only a temporary fix because they still rely on gas part of the time. I have had an idea for a while about harnessing a vehicles motion to create electricity. They have a similar concept of this in the regenerative braking that a lot of the hybrids use. Regenerative braking turns the motor that is driving the car into a big alternator. And when this happens the drag of the rotor passing through the field of the stator inside of the alternator slows the vehicle down. My idea is to put small alternator on each of the drive axles so that you are creating energy not only while the car is braking but also during acceleration and cruising. This would eliminate the need for the conventional internal combustion engine. I’m not sure if this power source would be infinite but it should be longer than the predicted forty mile charge of the Chevy Volt. The only thing that might be a problem with that design is the drag that the alternators would put on the drive motor. But I think that if you keep the voltage going to the rotor low and the alternators themselves small then I think that you would be able to keep enough voltage going to the batteries to keep them sufficiently charged for a longer distance. I guess this whole rant was just a question. And that question is: why has nobody come up with these ideas before? Or if they have what is wrong with these ideas? Please feel free to comment I have had these ideas for a couple years now and have just been curious as to why car manufacturers haven’t thought of this stuff when they have thousands of employees that I'm sure are smarter than I am. I am just a 19 year old kid that goes to a technical institute to be an auto mechanic. Thank you for reading this
|
|
|
Replying to: nagano89 (Oct 26, 2008 7:02 pm) Regarding Stanley Meyer, he's a convicted fraudster. Read more about him here Meyer Bio It's not the 'oil companies' keeping this from working, it's Mother Nature. |
|
|
Replying to: taylor47 (Jun 04, 2004 8:31 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: coffedrunk (Feb 25, 2008 7:29 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: electrictroy (Dec 02, 2004 2:30 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: headkey (Dec 07, 2008 7:05 pm) If you wish to engage other members in dialogue about this subject, you are more than welcome to do so; however, disparaging remarks about others aren't tolerated. Please remember that there are a wide variety of opinions, and the possibility exists that not everyone has the same viewpoint or oil dependency-reduction goals as you may have. |
|
|
Replying to: bottgers (May 07, 2004 5:10 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: momax (Feb 12, 2009 1:05 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: bottgers (May 07, 2004 5:10 pm) Forgive me, this has been piling up inside me for-- years. Today, I watched T Boone Pickens going on and on about wind power and natural gas. I have read about plug in's, Hybrids and such, Hydrogen cell, natural gas, Bio fuels, wind power and solar power. Let's keep it simple. I will assume we all know the basic concepts, benefits and drawbacks of each form of providing usable power. I have read, more than once and heard that if we were to convert every square inch of available space to solar and/or wind power, we still couldn't meet more than 20% of this countrys energy needs. We talk about electric vehicles. Plug ins. We talk about Hybrids. Both have, currently, severe drawbacks. The plug ins drawback is-- the plug. The Hybrid (aside from the manufacturing process and accompanying pollution) is that it runs on the gas motor whenever you turn on the heater, run on the expressway or, (for now) turn on the air conditioner. At the risk of throwing away a chance to be wealthy for my idea-- which I cannot believe is "my" idea alone-- why can't we make an electric car that runs on batteries, with a kerosene furnace for heat (the VW 412 had it in the early 70's. it ran off gasoline from the gas tank) and a RV camper refrigerator style air conditioner? But, I'm not done. California already has a problem with brown outs when everyone kicks on the home air conditioners. Whats going to happen when everyone gets home from work and plugs in ther Chevy Volt at 5PM? How far can you go in a Chevy Volt? What if you want to take a 600 mile trip? What do you do, stop and plug it in for 4 hours? Imagine this: Your driving along on the expressway, the volt meter shows you are getting low. Up ahead, you see a gas station. You exit the expressway, pull into the gas station and, instead of pulling up to the gas pump, you pull up to a long rack that stands next to a wind generator and topped off with a solar panel. An attendant comes out. You throw a positive lock switch. Your electric car is now only powerd by a low voltage battery that keeps the computer, radio memory and instrument cluster powered up. You reach down and pull a lever-- just like the lever you pull to release your trunk or hood. The attendant unplugs the battery pack, flips the latches holding the battery pack in place and attaches a hook to the pack strap. Using an electric hoist, he lifts out the battery pack, swings it over to an open slot in the rack, sides it onto the rack rollers and shoves it back with a clunk. A green light next to that slot starts flashing green. The connection is made, the battery pack is getting re-charged.Then he takes that hook, walks over to another slot in the rack, attaches the hook to a battery pack with a solid green light, pulls out a fully charged pack, sits it in your car, latches the battery pack tightly in place, reconnects the plugs and slams your hood shut. He then walks to your window, takes your $20.00 credit card or cash. You flip that positive lock switch in your car, your instrument cluster lights up and tells you you are good to go and you're off! As technology improves, you might be able to go 200 or 300 miles before you need to get another pack. Got a big SUV or high performance car? Well, you might need to buy two or three battery packs. That's the price you pay for your big SUV or hot rod car! For most of us, in a sub compact size car, like a Corolla, Focus or Civic, one pack is enough-- thank you very much! When you do get home, you plug in your electric car to a solar powered charging station or the house current, just to "top off the tank" so to speak. The one thing that needs to change is-- all manufacturers will need to standardize the battery pack and the receptacle. They do it now for fuel tank fill necks, it wouldn't be hard at all. Think of it along the lines of a barbecue propane tank exhange or a welding torch tank exhange-- no different. New technology? I'm all for it. But, before we go jumping into new technology with no certain outcome, why don't we use what we know works? This would work. Battery packs avialable at gas stations. Recharged with solar cells or wind turbines-- or, right off the grid. Got an old gas powered car? Buy gas. Got an electric car? Exhange a battery pack! A plain old, current technology battery pack and one, two or four current technology electric motors could be installed in an existing body vehicle, take you at least 100 miles and be-- of all things-- PRACTICAL!! And, it wouldn't cost $40K or require years and millions of dollars worth of R & D. If Ford comes out with a new electric motor that has more power and better range, whats the difference between that and trading in your old OHV gas guzzler V8 for a new 4 cylinder DOHC? If new battery packs come out that last longer with more power, whats the difference between that and buying premium gas or, (for those of you that remember) the switch over from leaded to unleaded fuel? Until the old style batterys have worn out and are no longer available, you get a choice. heck, they could discount them for us cheapskates that would pay $10.00 to go 100 miles rather than $20.00-$25.00 to go 250 miles with the new type battery pack. What's stopping this from happening? Technology? No-- we have it. Cost? The gas station owners will see the writing on the wall and invest in the "pack rack" and charging system. Just like they invested in gas pumps and storage tanks out in front of their blacksmith shops in the early 1900's. I have looked, I have asked. No one seems to be able to tell me why this isn't feasable and do-able in a very short time. Maybe some one here can. That's why I'm posting this-- I gotta know! Am I a visionary or am I just simple minded? Thanks for letting me rant. I just had to do it. Wozerd |
|
|
|
| IM SORRY TO INTERRUPT BUT WILL SOMEONE, ANYONE PLZ TELL ME HOW TO ERASE MY ACCOUNT ON THIS. | |
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars Hydrogen Fuel Cell Cars
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
