Sign In Join 



Hybrid Diesels? - READ ONLY

395 messages,  Last post on Aug 29, 2007 at 7:27 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Diesel, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 39 of 41
1
...
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#374 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [goodcrd] by kdhspyder
Dec 02, 2006 (10:07 pm)

Replying to: goodcrd (Dec 02, 2006 7:34 pm)

An answer to the anger whatever. NO! I'm just a little surprised of the Toyota hugging, foreign made is better then American nonsense your pushing. Just keep sending your money overseas and believing all the hype. As for the fullsize Toyotas having no trans issues, Wrong. Also how about Toyota being forced to recall about 1.5 million cars by the Japan government due to a lose of life steering component issue. Toyota use to hide recalls. What I'm tying to get through to a Toyota biased person is that Toyota is no better then any other auto maker. So get real. Or could you be employed by Toyota or one of it's dealers? Ask a contractor who depends on their work truck who makes the best truck. Ford!!! And I don't like Fords in general. I like GM and Dodge. GM makes the best V6 engines and most durable transmission in general. Dodge makes the best four cylinder engines and small FWD trans. Ford makes the best breathing V8's and the best Straight 6 cylinder engines. The best V8 is the one use in the Corvette. And Toyota makes Toys for people like you.
 
No hugging. No vehicle is made by divine hands so all are subject problems and potenial recalls. It's how the problems are handled. After 17 years and $400 in total 'unexpected expenses' they've earned my trust. Even the Prius which had the steering recall done last month cost me nothing and in no way put me out. It's a non-issue, it's fixed, it's done.
 
Now the rest of this rant is just goofieness..some of it's hilarious. 4c? ( You must be kidding ). The best V6 now is made by Toyota or Nissan or even Hyundai.
 
What I'm tying to get through to a Toyota biased person is that Toyota is no better then any other auto maker. So get real. Or could you be employed by Toyota or one of it's dealers? Ask a contractor who depends on their work truck who makes the best truck. Ford!!! And I don't like Fords in general. I like GM and Dodge. GM makes the best V6 engines and most durable transmission in general. Dodge makes the best four cylinder engines and small FWD trans. Ford makes the best breathing V8's and the best Straight 6 cylinder engines. The best V8 is the one use in the Corvette. And Toyota makes Toys for people like you.
 
And wait until you see what the new 5.7L in the Tundra does to the others. It is so far off the scale that you won't believe your eyes. How about this little tidbit.
New Tundra 5.7L vs F150 5.4L... The Tundra is faster 0-60 and then brakes to a stop before the F150 even gets to 60. It's ridiculous what this will do to the industry. Only the GMT900's are close to the new Tundra.
 
BTW don't be surprised if Daimler puts a bullet in the head of Dodge and Chrysler and keeps Jeep. Did you see yesterday that in order to move the 2006 RAMs which are becoming lot anchors Dodge has incentives of $15000 !!!! Despite how good they are... ... apparently it hasn't been reflected in the public's willingness to buy them.
 
Now back to our regularly scheduled thread..
 
For a small fuel efficent car or truck a Hybrid diesel is not cost effective.
 
You are sure of this now? What if Toyuzu comes out with an $18,000 hybrid diesel that get's 70-80 mpg in 2010?
 
Gm already has a small hybrid diesel. It can't be sold here because of the emissions requirements
 
You will have to give me a link to what this vehicle is because it is unknown to me? You wouldn't be making things up would you now? Where can someone find this small GM diesel hybrid?
 
Oh, but what about Toyota. Using old technology found in US engineering schools for years. That is what Teas me off. Just give it all away and our children will pay for their parents buying US technology used overseas and sold back to us and there go the jobs. Go ahead buy Toyota then stick your head in the sand. Be careful soon the US "sand" may be owned by "Toyota". Good Day.
 
Your anger is getting the better of you again. When GM relocates most of it's facilities to China and Ford sells off it's European parts and moves everything to Mexico and Daimler kills off Dodge and Chrysler... you better hope that Toyota and Honda and Hyundai step in and hire new people to make up for the ones the detroiters ditched.
#375 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [kdhspyder] by goodcrd
Dec 02, 2006 (10:20 pm)

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 02, 2006 10:07 pm)

Yo Toy boy. Here's your link http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/adv_tech/100_news/astra_011005.html and you definitly don't have a clue. But you have the right to your opinion. And your what if's for 2010. What are they going to copy and improve on GM's work again. Be real.
#376 of 395
OK by pf_flyer HOST
Dec 03, 2006 (6:26 am)
Let's back off on making comments about each other and stick to discussing the vehicles please.
 
It's VERY easy for these things to spiral into personal disputes, so let's back off a bit right now please.
#377 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [goodcrd] by kdhspyder
Dec 03, 2006 (7:50 am)

Replying to: goodcrd (Dec 02, 2006 10:20 pm)

Thanks for the link. It's a concept so it doesn't really exist but it does look interesting. Tks.
 
Rather than allowing Toyota to improve on GM's design...GM should just bring it to market first.. get the profits and take the glory.
#378 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [kdhspyder] by goodcrd
Dec 03, 2006 (9:15 am)

Replying to: kdhspyder (Dec 03, 2006 7:50 am)

You still don't get it. It's not cost effective. There is a "concept" called point of diminishing returns. And small hybrid diesels are past that point right now. Say if fuel costs go to $5.00 per gallon then maybe. A Hybrid diesel like the Opel should conservatively get 50 mpg combined. It's non-hybrid version 40 mpg. That is a 25% increase. At $5.00 per gallon that's $0.125/mile non-hybrid and $0.100/mile for the hybrid version. Over 150,000 miles the difference works out to be $3,750 in fuel costs savings. That will take 6+ years to recover the initial costs at $5.00 per gallon, longer at $3.00. At $3.00 per gallon it works out to $2,250 for the same 150,000 miles. Not practical!! Advanced engines which are more efficent like the Scuderi design are better solutions and are easier and more cost effective to Hybridtise. Now this is my estimate on when you will see this engine in production and used in a production vehicle. 5 years. Shortly after most manufactures get their diesel models to pass US EPA emission standards. When it comes to doing business glory has nothing to do with it. It's all dollars and cents. You can't eat glory.
#379 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [goodcrd] by kdhspyder
Dec 03, 2006 (1:17 pm)

Replying to: goodcrd (Dec 03, 2006 9:15 am)

The Prius wasn't cost effective when it was first introduced in 2000 but Toyota took the risk so that by next year they will havesold nearly a million of the hybrids.
 
Seriously now, Maybe that is the very point of all of this. GM should bring this to market in the same way Toyota and Honda did in 2000. Take the risk. It looks good. It'll probably get great gas mileage. Just Do It.
 
Since 2000 Toyota and Honda have shipped nearly 1.0 Million hybrids and gathered all the good press and probably some profit. They took the risk. If the GM product is more than a skin over an idea then put it on the market. If they keep dragging their feet then Toyuzu and Honda and Renault all will have the diesel hybrid here first, making money and getting the good press.
 
Now if it is just a skin over an engineer's dream then maybe it's not ready for the road. You can bet that in 2010 a Toyuzu diesel hybrid will be here. Gm better have this Opel ready as well.
 
GM faithful are dying for GM to do something dramatic, like the Saturn announcement this week, to show that GM understands the surge of buying interest in fuel efficient vehicles.
#380 of 395
Re: Reverse Engineer [goodcrd] by tpe
Dec 04, 2006 (10:13 am)

Replying to: goodcrd (Dec 03, 2006 9:15 am)

Say if fuel costs go to $5.00 per gallon then maybe. A Hybrid diesel like the Opel should conservatively get 50 mpg combined. It's non-hybrid version 40 mpg. That is a 25% increase. At $5.00 per gallon that's $0.125/mile non-hybrid and $0.100/mile for the hybrid version. Over 150,000 miles the difference works out to be $3,750 in fuel costs savings. That will take 6+ years to recover the initial costs at $5.00 per gallon, longer at $3.00. At $3.00 per gallon it works out to $2,250 for the same 150,000 miles. Not practical!!
 
Isn't this vehicle being introduced in Europe? If so then gas prices would have to go down to hit $5/gallon. Actually I've never understood why manufacturers are making hybrid versions of these already fuel efficient vehicles like the 40 mpg Opal. Take a 20 mpg vehicle and increase its fuel efficiency by this same 25% and you'll save twice as much money on fuel.
 
When people talk about not recovering the hybrid premium they seem to rarely mention the resale value. If you get rid of your car after 3 years it will probably be worth about 50% of what you paid for it. So at that time you recover half of the hybrid premium.
#381 of 395
zytek hybrid diesel by marcb
Dec 08, 2006 (11:18 am)
http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=communique&newsid=13635
#382 of 395
Re: zytek hybrid diesel [marcb] by larsb
Dec 13, 2006 (7:07 am)

Replying to: marcb (Dec 08, 2006 11:18 am)

About 74 mpg US plus 20 miles in all EV mode - BRILLIANT !!
 
I'd buy that car today if it were for sale in the USA.
#383 of 395
I don't know if this has been posted before but here goes by larsb
Jan 28, 2007 (5:39 am)
Too bad this car never made it into production.
 
Hybrid diesel 4-dr sedan, 108 MPG in the year 2000.
 
GM Precept
 
The hybrid-electric Precept is driven by a battery-powered electric traction system that moves the front wheels, and a lightweight, 1.3-liter, 3-cylinder diesel engine in the rear. The direct-injection engine, featuring turbocharged compression ignition, was developed by Isuzu Motor Co. Ltd., one of GM's Asian affiliates.

Messages Page 39 of 41
1
...
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement