You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Hybrids in the News ![]()

5290 messages, Last post on Oct 25, 2006 at 8:37 AM
You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.
|
Replying to: larsb (Sep 28, 2006 6:31 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Sep 26, 2006 1:32 pm) As far as 'armor plated SUVs' go, well, a Highlander Hybrid can be armourized. So that's not a good argument for allowing government waste. And even, let's say, if certain officials, by the nature of security, are REQUIRED to drive SUVs - there are WAYS to get them up to 25 and 35 MPG. One group of scientists took a Ford Exploder up to almost 40 MPG with about $3400 in mods." I would like to see a URL to that story. The only case I know of is a bunch of university students who achieved good MPG - at a cost of 100K in specialized modifications. It is not a matter of requiring an SUV, it is a matter of load carrying capacity. Armor plating and bulletproof glass are heavy. A HH bearing that extra weight and the passenger weight would get pretty bad MPG, and might not perform well enough in emergency avoidance situations (the vehicle has to accelerate and maneuver around threats). In my younger days I had a tour of duty in Honduras. We had to drive up a mountain several times a week. The government origninally provided Chevy Suburbans with 6 cyl engines and factory armor plating. The vehicles could not get up the mountain. A V8 engine would have worked; this is the same principle. A security chief starts with the requirements, and then finds the vehicles that fit the requirement. But we needen't worry, the Excursion was phased out last October. So the Governator will be riding in something else next time... |
|
|
Replying to: texases (Sep 28, 2006 9:34 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Sep 28, 2006 9:53 am) |
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Sep 28, 2006 9:53 am) That is not true. There are no choices for efficient full size SUVs. The last diesel Suburban was in about 1999. The diesel Excursion is now history. If you are not interested in a half size SUV you are stuck with the current offering of gas guzzlers. I am hoping that DCX get the Grand Cherokee and MB diesels over here soon.
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Sep 28, 2006 2:07 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: tpe (Sep 28, 2006 4:03 pm) I think it is possible. Will it be as fast as one with a big gas V8? No If my Mercedes Sprinter conversion van can get 25 MPG weighing 8k lbs. I think that 5 cylinder diesel with the 5 speed Tiptronic could get 30 in a Suburban size vehicle. It would cruise all day at 80 MPH with that engine transmission combo. They are building one in Europe with a plug-in hybrid for city delivery. FedEx and UPS are buying them by the thousands. Until we get great batteries diesel is the best solution for economy in all but the smallest vehicles.
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Sep 28, 2006 8:23 pm) |
|
|
Citroen in designing the car, was simply trying to illustrate that a more environmentally friendly sports car can be made, said Lafaury, who was the project leader. "Currently, when you buy a sports car, you know it's an ecological problem," he said. He wasn't gushing in his view toward the market leader in hybrids, the Prius from Toyota "It's in production, so I have to respect that," Lafaury said. "But a diesel engine has lower emissions." Citroen hybrid Did I mention 0-60 in 6.2 seconds?
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Sep 29, 2006 7:23 am) Lower than WHAT? That's a very vague statement. Diesels emissions are: Not lower than PZEV gasser hybrids. Usually not lower than a SULEV gasser. What was his point?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Hybrids in the News ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats