Sign In Join 



Luxury Performance Sedans

10006 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 6:59 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus GS 430, Acura RL, BMW 5 Series, Volvo S80, Audi A6, Infiniti M35, Infiniti M45, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Cadillac STS, Sedan


Messages Page 993 of 1001
1
...
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
...
1001
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#9917 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [anon3] by lexusguy
May 09, 2009 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: anon3 (May 09, 2009 6:26 am)

When you get right down to it... almost every accident is the result of human stupidity, carelessness, inattention, or lack of skill. Personally, I don't believe there are any "accidents". Most are "caused" by driver stupidity and lack of skill.
 
Well, the word "accident" just implies that whoever was at fault was not intentionally trying to injure the other driver. I've heard the "I've been to a driver training school, or a defensive driving course, I'll never get hit" argument many times before. The fact is that in the real world there are situations where it simply does not matter.
 
The 5 series does not do as well in a side impact collision as it should. The IIHS gave it a "poor" rating, their lowest, for driver torso protection, and rated it "marginal" overall. Say your traveling through an intersection, and a drunk driver decides to run a red at 50mph and smashes into the side of your car. I don't care how many courses you've been to, your chances of avoiding this type of accident are slim.
 
The A6 aced the side impact test, as did the Volvo S80. The 5 did not. Your chances of walking away without injury from this type of accident are higher in the Audi or Volvo. That's a fact. I'm not saying it should be the only reason why someone should buy or not buy a car, just that those are the facts and something to consider.
 
The fact that the A6 aced its front, side, and rear impact tests, and has superb active safety features like Quattro traction and excellent brakes, certainly made my decision easier.
 
You can apologize for BMW as much as you wish, but they should've done a better job.
#9918 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [lexusguy] by vavavavolvo
May 09, 2009 (10:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (May 09, 2009 9:25 am)

Well said.
#9919 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [lexusguy] by houdini1
May 09, 2009 (10:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (May 09, 2009 9:25 am)

Very well said.
#9920 of 10006
Mercedes C class lost in the shuffle? by ghstudio
May 11, 2009 (2:32 am)
Reply
Why doesn't the Mercedes C class get compared to the TL/M/etc?
#9921 of 10006
Re: Mercedes C class lost in the shuffle? [ghstudio] by lexusguy
May 11, 2009 (5:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: ghstudio (May 11, 2009 2:32 am)

Why doesn't the Mercedes C class get compared to the TL/M/etc?
 
The C Class belongs on the entry level luxury sedans board - along with the TL, 3, A4, G37, etc.
#9922 of 10006
Re: Europe vs. Others [shmang] by markcincinnati
May 12, 2009 (2:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shmang (May 04, 2009 8:29 am)

Audi may not be your cup of tea; however, Audis generally and typically receive virtually universal praise for having the best interiors, even if the review or reviewer ends up not being impressed by the overall car.
 
This is not to suggest that the Japanese or other makers from other countries have poorly designed interiors, etc -- but Audi interiors and switchgear are second to none according to pedestrians like us and the pros from virtually every corner of the globe.
 
Solid and retro? My dad had a Hudson and a few Chryco cars over the years -- my 2009 Audi interior is anything but retro -- but, it is solid, if that means "substantive."
#9923 of 10006
Re: Europe vs. Others [markcincinnati] by shmang
May 12, 2009 (4:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (May 12, 2009 2:49 pm)

By retro, I mean classic. Did I mention heritage in my post. The interior for Audi is very nice - especially the new ones (Those from 2006, 2007 are not that impressive, especially w/o navigation system).
 
But, that does not mean the interior of Infiniti or Acura is cheesy. They are modern, fashion with distinct style that is targeting younger people, while Audi and MB, BMW are targeting more towards 40+ people (except those low end sporty models - we are talking about luxury performance sedan here).
 
So, don't get me wrong. I am not saying one is better than the other, it is just targeting different market group.
#9924 of 10006
Headroom issues by james27
Jun 04, 2009 (5:54 pm)
Reply
I've searched the specs of most cars in this category, and none of them have much more headroom, if any, than many mid-range cars. The Infiniti M-series has 39.7". The only other one with more (that I've found) is the Genesis, and then only if you can buy it without the sunroof. That also means you don't get many of the neat options. I'm slightly over 38", from seat to top of my head (not counting any hair that sticks up!), The Infiniti was the only car I found when I was looking where I could get comfortable without my head or hair hitting the roof. My last car was an Audi A6 when you could order it without a sunroof. Why do the manufacturers make the sunroof mandatory? It causes close to 3" loss of headroom (on the Audi it was 2.85").
 
Anyway, the new Mercedes E series states 39.1", which might work. May try one of those, but want to wait for the 4-matic version, if I was to go that way. Anyone know if the diesel version due next year will be offered with 4-matic? Rear-wheel drive up a snowy driveway in NH is no fun, even with snow tires...
#9925 of 10006
Re: Headroom issues [james27] by shmang
Jun 05, 2009 (6:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: james27 (Jun 04, 2009 5:54 pm)

Wow, 38". How tall are you - 6' 6" or more?
 
Maybe some SUV like QX56, LX470, Q7 will be more comfortable then.
#9926 of 10006
Re: Headroom issues [shmang] by james27
Jun 05, 2009 (2:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shmang (Jun 05, 2009 6:51 am)

Only about 6'3", but long torso. Typical SUV just raises the seat...same issues with headroom. Plus, have no need or desire for a gas hog with marginal handling. Now, if the manufacturers would only make their cars available without sunroofs (which I only use to vent for a short while after sitting in the sun all day), the choices would be much better. Cd tends to penalize them for tall cars. If manufacturers weren't so worried about liability, if the gas and brake pedals were closer to the same height, you could sit closer and lean the seat back further. My first new car was a Citroen ID19. Must have had 5" of headroom in that car and it had the most comfortable seat of any car I've owned. All three pedals, gas, brake, clutch were at the same height so you could easily move from one pedal to the other without having to lift, and thus sit further back, or lower to clear the steeringwheel. But, that was nearly 40-years ago...

Messages Page 993 of 1001
1
...
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
...
1001
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement