Sign In Join 



Luxury Performance Sedans

10006 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 6:59 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus GS 430, Acura RL, BMW 5 Series, Volvo S80, Audi A6, Infiniti M35, Infiniti M45, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Cadillac STS, Sedan


Messages Page 987 of 1002
1
...
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
...
1002
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#9854 of 10006
2002 volvo s-80 t6 by anagni
Apr 22, 2009 (6:41 pm)
Reply
HELLO, I AM LOOKING TO PURCHASE A 2002 VOLVO S-80 T6 WITH 96,000 MILES.FOR $6750.00 . HOW IS THE PRICE AND WHAT SHOULD I LOOK FOR WHEN INSPECTING THE CAR??/ THANK YOU
#9855 of 10006
Re: 2002 volvo s-80 t6 [anagni] by willie2l
Apr 23, 2009 (3:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: anagni (Apr 22, 2009 6:41 pm)

I can't help with the price but having owned several Volvos, which my wife has enjoyed driving, I suggest you look for a good extended warranty to pay for the not infrequent and expensive repairs. Best of luck with your purchase.
#9856 of 10006
Re: 2002 volvo s-80 t6 [willie2l] by vavavavolvo
Apr 23, 2009 (12:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: willie2l (Apr 23, 2009 3:06 am)

Amen to that. These are not low maintenance vehicles. Unfortunately, they are the polar opposite.
#9857 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [vavavavolvo] by anon3
Apr 23, 2009 (1:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vavavavolvo (Apr 01, 2009 4:53 pm)

"If there is a chance you might be unfortunate enough to be T-boned in a side impact I would strongly re-think a list where you rate the new 5 series above the RL."
 
And yet the 5 series gets five stars or a "good" rating in most or all of the other categories in other tests. So yes, if you think you are likely to be t-boned by a "moving deformable barrier" (specifically on the driver's side and not the passenger side) and if you're the type of person who chooses a vehicle based on just one of several safety ratings, then and Acura RL is probably a good choice for you.
 
By the way, I also own a 2008 Volvo XC70, which has great safety ratings. But the brakes can barely handle the weight of the car and it is so ludicrously slow that it is actually dangerous to drive in heavy urban traffic and areas where agile driving is required (like frequent merging onto busy highways and beltways.) I'd rather drive the BMW that has the agility, braking, and performance to avoid an accident.
 
One of my best friends totaled a BMW after a car clipped him at 60 mph and flipped his vehicle over a highway guard rail. He walked away from that crash literally with only a cut on the forehead. So I'll take my chances with the "moving deformable barrier" in a BMW.
#9858 of 10006
Re: details [lexusguy] by anon3
Apr 23, 2009 (2:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Apr 08, 2009 10:19 pm)

"Chasing after microscopic BMW invented niches is not a smart move for a brand that is getting crushed by the competition."
 
Good observation and now BMW is inventing yet another micro niche with its BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo.
 
http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Content/AllBMWs/ConceptVehicles/5SeriesGT/Default- - .aspx
#9859 of 10006
Re: 2002 volvo s-80 t6 [anagni] by markcincinnati
Apr 23, 2009 (2:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: anagni (Apr 22, 2009 6:41 pm)

This is, some would argue, more expensive than a new car with all new parts and a new car warranty (based on a 36 month lease).
 
The need to "self insure" makes this even more of a very expensive proposition.
 
Look at it this way: this is (or was) a high end car from its model year. Its safety reputation and even its performance reputation are decent.
 
The economy sucks.
 
Why not keep it, unless you for some reason don't need a car?
 
My point is that this is a "risky bargain."
 
Get a new Korean car from that company with the name beginning with an "H" -- or at least consider it.
 
This is based on my assumption that you were looking for a low price on what would be, new, a pretty expensive car.
#9860 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [anon3] by vavavavolvo
Apr 23, 2009 (4:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: anon3 (Apr 23, 2009 1:45 pm)

Your statement that the 5 gets "five stars or a good rating in most or all other categories in other tests" is simply not correct. It got a marginal rating in the IIHS side impact test for the driver side (as you noted). The other US testing organization, NHTSA, gave it 3/5 stars in driver's front impact score.
  So on both tests from the only two US agencies that do these tests the driver proved vulnerable and fared worse than in the RL (which was the vehicle that started this discussion).
 
This is meaningful to me because the driver's seat is the one I occupy. Also, the "moving deformable barrier" is the auto safety engineer's best approximation of the forces generated in a standardized, reproducible hit by another vehicle. In the case of a driver's side impact, that is the time when the driver is most vulnerable owing to the proximity of the impacting vehicle and the lack of significant deformable body structure in that location.
 
I'm glad your friend wasn't seriously injured in that rollover, but this kind of anecdotal information doesn't allow measured comparison with other vehicles. No doubt people have rolled Pintos and Corvairs and been fortunate enough to remain uninjured.
 
I agree with you about agility being another factor in accident avoidance and would never argue that it not be considered in a safety profile.
 
The 5 series does seem like a truly great car in so many respects that I am disappointed that the only response I got from one of their salespersons was to discount the testing..."that was one car on one day...". ..this while they have a framed certificate in the dealership for the 5 star crash rating of the 3 series. I trust that even if their salespersons don't have the grace to admit that this represents a problem their great engineers will solve this and remove it as an issue for those of us who care very much about moving deformable barriers.
#9861 of 10006
Re: 2002 volvo s-80 t6 [anagni] by lexusguy
Apr 24, 2009 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: anagni (Apr 22, 2009 6:41 pm)

That's a lot of miles for a European turbocharged luxury car. You'll need to be prepared for unexpected expenses that can run several hundred dollars a pop. That said, the price really isn't bad, most S80s of similar vintage seem to run $8-10K at retail. If you're absolutely in love with the car, have it thoroughly examined by a good Volvo dealer or an experienced mechanic before buying. The service records should be impeccable, and it should have a clean title with no reported serious accidents or repairs. CR rates the reliability for the '02 S80 as average.
 
If your budget can manage it, the '04s are rated much better than the '02s, especially the '04 2.5T five cylinder version. Or, you may want to consider something with easier maintenance, like an Accord.
#9862 of 10006
Re: 2007 Acura RL [vavavavolvo] by lexusguy
Apr 24, 2009 (10:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: vavavavolvo (Apr 23, 2009 4:09 pm)

So on both tests from the only two US agencies that do these tests the driver proved vulnerable and fared worse than in the RL (which was the vehicle that started this discussion).
 
The 5 did reasonably well in EuroNCAP's side impact test, but the 5 is not the best car in the segment for passive safety. There are a lot of factors that go in to making a car buying decision, and that's one factor. When I drove the the RL back when it was released, I found the seats to be uncomfortable, the cabin claustrophobic and cramped, the steering too heavy and completely numb, the transmission dimwitted and sluggish, throttle response poor, and ergonomics lousy. I would much rather drive a 535i than an RL, even if it is a bit less safe.
 
Fortunately there are a lot of choices in the midsize luxury segment, and the A6 is very safe, nice to drive, comfortable, and spacious.
#9863 of 10006
Volvos--I would Avoid by art234
Apr 24, 2009 (12:49 pm)
Reply
I had a 2001 S80 and regretted it from the very beginning. It was a service loaner with 8000 miles on it. I traded it in a year and a half later with 28000 miles, and lost 50% of what I paid just to be rid of it. I traded it for a 2005 G35x which was nice for my wife but too small--we eventually traded that for a 2006 Lexus RX400h hybrid which we still love to this day.
 
But I digress...the Volvo had some significant problems, from a clunky transmission to noises that the service department could never figure out to a number of bad radios. For EACH problem we experienced, the car was back to the dealer 4 times for the same issue before it was sort of resolved.
 
I would never buy ANY Volvo without some kind of extended warranty, and you should definitely have the car gone over by a tech familiar with Volvo prior to purchasing.
 
Good luck.

Messages Page 987 of 1002
1
...
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
...
1002
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement