You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Luxury Performance Sedans

10007 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 7:40 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: topspin628 (Sep 08, 2007 4:04 am) If you like MB CLK convertible, back in June, 550 with a MRSP in low $70 were leased for under 900 a month. Another nice car was just leased by my brother. It is Lexus GS350. Car has it all and not expensive. Sure it would be a little step down from big luxury sedans but again it is hard to tell where is that line of separation. I probably would consider this GS back when I was on the market if I would know better. Since you mentioned a BMW 535, I thought of that alternative. It would be no sport package that actually looks so M5. HP will be similar and quality of interior is unbelievably better. |
|
|
Replying to: shipo (Sep 01, 2007 4:39 pm) thanks
|
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Sep 02, 2007 10:14 am) thanks
|
|
|
Replying to: mojo1078 (Sep 08, 2007 12:06 pm) If a cushy FWD ride is what you're looking for, then the ES is possibly the perfect ride (although I would look at the Acura TL as well). Best Regards, Shipo |
|
|
Replying to: hihomike (Sep 03, 2007 4:31 am) thanks
|
|
|
Replying to: mojo1078 (Sep 08, 2007 12:21 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mojo1078 (Sep 08, 2007 12:12 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Sep 05, 2007 10:51 am) I agree, the RL's problem is the RL, not the engine. In a field of fantastic cars, it's merely an also ran. Even the S80 is better. I also agree with what others have said, the BMW 3.0TT is a far different beast than Acura's 3.5. The BMW engine produces in reality around 330hp, while the RL's 3.5 after the new SAE spec is down to 290hp. More importantly though, the 3.0TT produces V8 levels of torque barely above idle, while the RL's engine has to rev to 5000rpm in order to produce just 256ft.lbs. That simply isn't enough for a 4020lb. car, which is why the RL is so slow. A V8 would make it faster, but that would also make it even more nose heavy. The car in its current iteration is simply unfixable. They've got to start over from scratch.
|
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Sep 09, 2007 4:38 pm) Regards, OW
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Sep 09, 2007 2:17 pm) The 3.2 A6 is nice, but it's a bit underpowered When comparing 60k cars, the 4.2 A6 is probably the best bang for the buck out there. You can easily spend 5-7k more more on a comparably equipped AWD BMW or MB. But everybody seems to want lease deals, and the A6 isn't the car to buy beacuse of a low lease payment. From the sales figures I see, Audi really doesn't seem to worry about how many A6's they're selling in the US market. It's not the best "deal" out there, but certainly near the top of best cars in that category. |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2007 Lexus GS 430
2011 Acura RL
2011 BMW 5 Series
2010 Volvo S80
2010 Audi A6
2010 Infiniti M35
2010 Infiniti M45
2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2010 Cadillac STS



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats