Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Luxury Performance Sedans
9978 messages, Last post on Nov 02, 2009 at 1:30 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Mar 02, 2007 3:43 pm) Also, any guesses as to why the RL isn't selling at all? It seems to be a beautiful car (albeit with stiff competition). Also, does anyone think that Infiniti and/or Lexus will do anything in reaction the new $3500 dealer cash on the RL?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone, I am currently in the market for a 2006 M35/45. I only like the Wheat Interior with Rosewood Trim, which rules out the Sport Package. I am looking for the Technology Package, however. So, I'm comparing a regular M35 vs. an M45. The cars look identical on the interior & exterior. The only difference I'm aware of is what's under the hood. The price difference on the used market is between $5K and $8K, depending on exact options, mileage, etc. Question -- Is an M45 worth the difference? That is a lot of money for just an engine upgrade. But I've also heard the Infiniti V-8 is much smoother and quieter than the V-6. EPA gas mileage is only 1-2 mpg worse. Some people have said an M35 is essentially nicer and larger G35. But the M45 has an unique engine not shared with the G, and that alone is worth the price of admission. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. If there are other differences (good & bad) I haven't thought about, please let me know. Thanks!
|
|
|
Replying to: dhamilton (Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: vanhalenabe (Mar 02, 2007 8:05 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: kkoshkin (Mar 02, 2007 5:43 pm) Hmm.. where to begin. It's slow, the handling is lousy, its too heavy, fuel economy is poor, there aren't enough options, it looks invisible compared to the rest of the class, some of the materials are chintzy, the center stack is awful, its too small, its stuck with a 5-speed auto, the seats are from a $20K car, the keyless ignition is a last minute hack-job, and the TL is a better car. Other than that, the RL rocks.
|
|
|
Replying to: uglybear (Mar 02, 2007 8:22 pm) The driving dynamics are great on the FX, but I think equally good [in a different way] in the new MDX. Both of these are at odds with themselves, as they are overweight people haulers. Have you driven them both?
|
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Mar 03, 2007 3:10 am) But, I think the biggest reason the RL doesn't sell is the way it looks... It just doesn't look like an LPS.. Even in the Acura showroom, the TL looks more like an LPS than the RL. Because, really... 95% of buyers don't pay any attention to acceleration, weight, fuel economy, etc, etc... You really pegged it with this: it looks invisible compared to the rest of the class. regards, kyfdx (not the host here)
|
|
|
Replying to: uglybear (Mar 02, 2007 8:22 pm) multiple blind spots, subpar a/c (why I dunno as the M has great air), starting to get dated, and poor gas mileage.
|
|
|
Replying to: kkoshkin (Mar 02, 2007 5:43 pm) Go to www.theautochannel.com During the first few days of the month auto manufacturers announce their monthly sales. Of course the site is not as good as Edmunds LOL. |
|
|
Replying to: carnaught (Mar 03, 2007 8:27 am)
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2007 Lexus GS 430
2011 Acura RL
2011 BMW 5 Series
2010 Volvo S80
2010 Audi A6
2010 Infiniti M35
2010 Infiniti M45
2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2010 Cadillac STS
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
