Sign In Join 



Luxury Performance Sedans

9978 messages,  Last post on Nov 02, 2009 at 1:30 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus GS 430, Acura RL, BMW 5 Series, Volvo S80, Audi A6, Infiniti M35, Infiniti M45, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Cadillac STS, Sedan


Messages Page 870 of 999
1
...
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
...
999
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8687 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [domenickamarc] by fonefixer
Nov 07, 2006 (12:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: domenickamarc (Nov 07, 2006 12:02 pm)

No apology needed. You were making a point, and so was I. The Audi, even when new, had more lag than the Mazda, especially from a dead stop. The Mazda has virtually no turbo lag from takeoff, and maybe just a bit at about 55 mph, when "stepping on it" until at about 60 mph, it really takes off.
 
Since the Mazda is a new model, there is no data about reliability. I just hope that it has to be better than the Audi, which never went more than 4 0r 5 thousand miles between repairs, in warranty or out.
This is a list of repairs performed on this car in the last 6 years:
1.) driver's window motor
2.) passenger window motor
3.) climate control module
4.) heater blower motor
5.) front lower tie rods
6.) front brake rotors---5 times
7.) air conditioning vacuum assembly
8.) secondary electric fan
9.) turn signal module
10.) air bag control module
11.) valve cover gaskets
12.) cam chain gasket
13.) water pump
14.) timing belt
15>) tensioner rollers
15.) air pump
 
I didn't realize when buying this car that the twin turbo Audi was, and probably still is one of the most sophisticated and complex cars on the road and getting anything fixed would be quite the chore in many ways.
 
Do you think that the new ones are more reliable?
#8688 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [fonefixer] by domenickamarc
Nov 07, 2006 (2:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Nov 07, 2006 12:52 pm)

Do you think that the new ones are more reliable?"
 
Well, yeah, that's what I'm speculating will turn out to be the case.
 
Your experience was horrendous. If I had that experience with any brand-product, from refrigerator to car, I don't know that I could ever bring myself to buy another product from that manufacturer.
 
But, what I'm reading, in many publications, is that the German carmakers have gotten the message, especially over the past five years: here in the U.S. we will drop you like a hot potato if we form the impression that you're peddling high-class lemons. And they quickly (frantically) have mobilized in response, essentially copying from the Japanese what the Japanese originally learned from an American theorist (about insuring consistent quality production). So, even if you just look at the progression of red (good) and black (bad) dots in CR's reports on Audi, the red dots have displaced the black ones (but not eliminated them yet) going from 2000 through 2005.
#8689 of 9978
Re: What's up with the Germans and 255 (ish) HP? [lexusguy] by habitat1
Nov 07, 2006 (2:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Nov 05, 2006 7:34 am)

"I'm not sure that the "German horses are bigger" argument still holds up anymore. The 335i and IS350 are just about equal in 0-60 runs, and horsepower is basically the same. The LS430 is VERY fast for its 278hp, certainly faster than the 275hp S430."
 
I think German horses are still bigger. On the IS350, it appears that Lexus advertises the best time anyone ever achieved, downhill, downwind as the "official" perfromance figure. BMW usually conservatively underestimates their performance figures. From Motor Trends separate test of the two cars, the BMW (4.9) is significantly quicker than the Lexus (5.5)
 
I've never driven the LS and S430 back to back, but I did drive the 545i and GS430 back to back a couple of years age and, in spite of similar power ratings, there was no comparison whatsoever. I subsequently saw 0-60 times by the various car magazines that put the BMW 0.5 to 1.0 second ahead of the Lexus. Even the lower horsepower rated E430 felt quicker than the Lexus, but I don't remember any road test results.
 
Certainly, all of these cars are "quick enough" for the luxury performance sedan segment. But I do appreciate a corporate philosophy that is conservative in it's advertising and overdelivers in substance. The 911S I have is rated by Porsche at "only" 4.7 seconds 0-60. On paper, that's not that much quicker than an IS350, if you belive Lexus figures. But all of the road tests of the 911S come in at 3.9 to 4.3, which is pretty close to supercar territory.
 
As an owner of two Acura's, I will give Lexus credit for at least not having to downward revise it's entire fleet for overstating horsepower the way Honda/Acura had to. But if I see a manufacturer's performance figures, I still give the Germans - especially BMW and Porsche - the highest credibility rating.
#8690 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [fonefixer] by markcincinnati
Nov 07, 2006 (2:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Nov 07, 2006 12:52 pm)

I had a 2003 allroad 2.7T w/6sd manual.
 
The engine, dare I say it?, like all Audi engines was flawless in every way. We also had over the past few years three Audi TT's also turbos. The 225HP version, our last 2, were wonderful and also (from an engine standpoint) were flawless.
 
I have been to several Audi gtg's in Europe with American Audi owners and many of them had A4's with the 2.7T engine and they loved it.
 
This engine gets to full torque at 1800 RPM and I would characterize it as having "virtually zero" lag (2003 vintage, remember.)
 
Now, at speeds above 100, the depth, so to speak, of the Audi normally aspirated V8 did shine in terms of its remaining pull.
 
But, now, with a 255HP non turbo V6, I "feel" nearly the same pull as I did with my three Audi 4.2L V8 equipped cars (2 A6's and 1 A8.)
 
Audis have always been breathtakingly expensive to possess out of warranty. You must've gotten a lemon.
 
My wife and I have had 28 Audis. Yet, in full disclosure, NEVER one beyond 50K miles. Yet, this is not because we had reliability concerns, we just loved the cars so much we wanted new ones about every other year starting in 1977.
 
They were not perfect.
 
My 2005 A6 3.2 seems darn near so, though.
 
Sorry for your issues.
 
I would buy an Audi turbo without hesitation.
 
Ditto BMW.
 
Now talk about LAG, Volvo's 5 cylinder 300HP turbo motor is a sleeper until you get the turbos spooled up, then it is a rocket.
 
Overall, I would not discount a turbo -- indeed a turbo diesel from Audi (for one) would be ideal: powerful and pragmatic -- not to mention frugal.
 
Of course, no matter what, I would want the warranty to 100K miles that comes with the "cpo'ing" one may have done to one's own car at something less than 50K miles.
#8691 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [markcincinnati] by sfcharlie
Nov 07, 2006 (2:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Nov 07, 2006 2:09 pm)

"Of course, no matter what, I would want the warranty to 100K miles that comes with the "cpo'ing" one may have done to one's own car at something less than 50K miles."
 
Would you consider a third-party warranty, such as Warranty Direct as an alternative to having your leased car CPO'd?
 
What's involved in getting an Audi or BMW CPO'd out to 100K?
 
Has anyone done either recently?
#8692 of 9978
Press Request by KarenS HOST
Nov 07, 2006 (5:15 pm)
Reply
A national newspaper is looking to interview consumers who have recently purchased a luxury car for the first time and about why you decided to purchase a luxury car. Please send an e-mail to ctalatiedmunds.com no later than Friday, November 10, 2006 by 2:00 PM PST/5:00 EST containing your daytime contact information.
#8693 of 9978
Audi elsewhere by sfcharlie
Nov 07, 2006 (10:14 pm)
Reply
Unbeatable in terms of quality and reliability: the Audi A2 was the winner of the TÜV Auto-Report 2004. According to the experts at Germany's Technical Inspection Authority TÜV, no other vehicle up to three years old gave cause for fewer complaints.
 
Audi captured first place in the "Service" category of the 2006 "Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) StudySM" in China. This study, which is conducted annually, has now been published by J.D. Power Asia Pacific. By taking 834 of a possible 1,000 points, Audi shot to the top of the rankings, recording a new record points total in the process. Furthermore, Audi is the only company which has featured in the top three in each of the last five years.
#8694 of 9978
Re: Horsepower Forum (Extended Warranty?) by seloo
Nov 08, 2006 (3:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: sfcharlie (Nov 07, 2006 2:58 pm)

As we do in LPS pricing, we need to leverage our collective bargaining power and post details concerning all extended warranties for LPSs, so we negotiate and purchase with confidence.
 
Coverage, costs, experience with company, etc...
#8695 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [sfcharlie] by markcincinnati
Nov 08, 2006 (5:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: sfcharlie (Nov 07, 2006 2:58 pm)

Today there is no need to go outside of Audi for the extended warranty/service plan.
 
I guess that means my answer is no.
#8696 of 9978
Re: Horsepower forum? [markcincinnati] by fonefixer
Nov 08, 2006 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Nov 07, 2006 2:09 pm)

I don't have any data to back this statement up, but I don't think my 2000 A6 2.7T was a lemon. It would be fascinating to collect stories from owners that have put on the 100,000 miles that I did and compare the Audi driving experience.
 
 Appears from discourse with mechanics and dealers that the non-maintenance items that were replaced/repaired on this Audi were about an "average" situation for the miles logged.
 
In fact, I was informed by those in the know that at about 125,000 miles, these cars have major catastrophic breakdowns and significant electrical problems.
 
This all reinforces what you have been writing for the past several years, that Audis are breathtakingly expensive to repair and driving one without a warranty/lease is a no-no.
 
I'm not picking on Audi, this just happens to be my experience the last 6+ years. Would say that all LPS are "breathtakingly expensive" to repair and who knows about their longetivity after 125,000 miles?
 
I have heard from Lexus drivers that the cars are indeed good and trouble free, but that the Lexus maintenance program is a "ripoff." Heard complaints that adhering to the schedule has you coming into the Lexus dealer every 5,000 miles for a minimum of $500+. Somebody has to pay for that new showroom /waiting room with wide screen Tv, wireless internet, free snack bar, conference room, and probably even a suite to take a nap while your Lexus is being serviced!

Messages Page 870 of 999
1
...
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
...
999
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement