Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Luxury Performance Sedans
10006 messages, Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 6:59 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: shermanl (Sep 23, 2006 3:52 pm) With oil at around $61, thats less of an issue than it was a few months ago. |
|
|
My 2005 A6 4.2 came with 245/40/18 tires, I am thinking of going with a 255/40/18 replacement tire. The OD on the OEM tire is 25.7, the OD on the replacement tire is 26.0. I am concerned that the larger tire may rub or cause a problem with the Quattro system. Does anyone have any experience with the larger tire size? Does it rub? Should I be concerned about the impact on the Quattro system? Can I stick with the OEM rims? Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kgary (Sep 24, 2006 3:29 am) 255 would be a "perfect" plus zero and from what i can tell, requires nothing be done to the car iteself. What do you think you will get out of the plus sizing? This is not a trick question -- at least I don't intend it to be. I live in SW Ohio and the wider the tires, typically, the poorer the winter experience (and I would personally go with UHP all seasons, which may not be your approach.)
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Sep 24, 2006 5:32 am) I have the Pirelli PZero Nero M & S tires on the car already. So I am in complete agreement on UHP tires for the car. I like the look of wider tires, but I don't want to go to a lower profile and risk getting a harsher ride. Do you know anyone who put 265/40/18s on the car? Kevin
|
|
|
Got this from somewhere else. My copy of C&D hasn't come in the mail yet. "C&D November - M45 vs. 550i vs. E550 vs. GS450h 1. Infiniti M45 Sport 2. BMW 550i Sport 3. Mercedes-Benz E550 4. Lexus GS450h The Infiniti had a one point advantage over the BMW overall. The BMW edged out the Infiniti by two points in the Fun-To-Drive category, but the Infiniti had a 5 point advantage in the Price category. The BMW cost almost $15,000 more than the Infiniti. The BMW was almost $71,000! The Infiniti also won the Got-To-Have-It category, edging out the BMW by one point."
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kgary (Sep 24, 2006 6:41 am) I am considering the PZero M+S -- any feedback? Treadwear?
|
|
|
Replying to: jrock65 (Sep 24, 2006 7:31 am) Fair enough. Price-wise BMW will lose out all the time against the competition, except maybe Benzes. The 'Fun to Drive" aspect of BMWs are valued more higher by some drivers who usually end up being BMW owners. My BMW335i will be priced slightly above the competition. But IMO the BMW335i is the best value!
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Sep 24, 2006 12:08 pm) Kevin |
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Sep 24, 2006 2:08 pm) Note that the M also won the C&D "Gotta have it" category, which is the closest category they have to " most desired car, independent of price." The interesting thing IMO, is that the M wins, despite the fact these reviews tend to ignore two very important areas almost entirely. 1) Reliability. Look at consumer reports reliability surveys where the M far outshines the BMW and M-B. Also look at the Consumer reports Owner Satisfaction Survey, where the M wins with 92% of owners who would buy again, as compared to about 70% of 5-Series owners, and 62% of E-Series owners. Seems to me these are very big issues when it comes to overall value, yet not even considered in the C&D review. Don't you feel kind of foolish every time you have to bring this very high priced car into the shop. I know I do with my M-B. 2) Navigation and other electronics. As a serious user of Navigation (and a successfully retired software developer), I feel pretty clear about the fact that the M's navigation (including a wonderful voice command for destination street addresses) completely blows away the BMW and M-B systems, in so many ways. These reviews place far less weight on these systems than than their actual effect on most potential owners. (C&D IS an enthusiast rag after all. However PC magazine, Popular Mechanics and others also give the M luxury car of the year, coming from a very strong technology perspective) Look at the M's incredibly bright rear view monitor (even in the black of night) The lines showing your car's path, as you turn that steering wheel, are a total pleasure in every parking experience and every time you're in reverse. Again, given very short shrift in these reviews. If you look at the total package: The "Gotta Have It" quality, reliability, great electronics, a fantastic performer and a great handling car to boot, it's hard to see how the M wouldn't be a much bigger winner, or how the BMW can be the better valued car. My plan, before I bought my M, was to find the best car I could for less than $110K. I got the M not because it was the best car for the money, but because, from my perspective, it was the best car period. I'd really have preferred to pay more if meant getting a better car and getting some more prestige along with it. In the end, I had to go with what I thought was the best car, and after more than a year, I haven't been disappointed. But to each their own. Pete |
|
|
Replying to: jrock65 (Sep 24, 2006 7:31 am) 2. BMW 550i Sport 3. Mercedes-Benz E550 4. Lexus GS450h " Were they all automatics? Since the M & E550 only come that way, I hope the BMW was also equipped with theirs... Thanks, - Ray Also not yet received my copy of C+D.... |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2007 Lexus GS 430
2011 Acura RL
2011 BMW 5 Series
2010 Volvo S80
2010 Audi A6
2010 Infiniti M35
2010 Infiniti M45
2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2010 Cadillac STS
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
