Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Luxury Performance Sedans
9978 messages, Last post on Nov 02, 2009 at 1:30 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
| True, I did assume it was a '98+. Could you help us with this question lpc05? What year is your LS? | |
|
Curious to see how the Luxury Sports Sedans did last month. Thank you
|
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (May 03, 2005 8:45 am) 5 = 4,571 E = 3,731 STS = 3,541 GS = 3,198 M = 2,288 RL = 1,304 March 2005 Sales 5 = 3,949 E = 3,608 GS = 3,209 STS = 2,954 M = 2,253 A6 = 1,681 RL = 1,376
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (May 03, 2005 8:45 am) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jrock65 (May 03, 2005 11:47 am) I also presume STS incentives are doing the trick?
|
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (May 03, 2005 12:38 pm) Are there incentives on the STS? All I've seen is 5.9% financing.
|
|
|
Replying to: jrock65 (May 03, 2005 11:47 am) 5, E, and STS are selling surprisingly well. Why is 5 selling so well?? (I also think Lincoln LS sales are surprisingly high--jrock, do you have this?). More surprises: STS and GS selling better than M. No surprise: RL coming in last. Acura, however, must be shocked, shocked, especially after C&D included it in the 10 Best Cars in the World shortly after its introduction (but before the M and GS debuted).
|
|
|
Replying to: bartalk3 (May 03, 2005 2:18 pm) The average buyer has heard about Mercedes and Cadillacs all their life. During the 80's, BMW established such an image of being upwardly mobile that they are just as easily recognizable. I would bet that most people who buy a Jag like the look and the name, but don't care too much about performance (unless they shop for the R versions)--my wife is one; she loves the look of the S and I would have felt guilty not getting one if the rear seat had had more room. With Lexus being (relatively) much newer and Infiniti being just as new but out of the spotlight in recent years (until the G35, then the FX, and now the M). These are just below many people's radar.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bartalk3 (May 03, 2005 2:06 pm) Maybe that is a local incentive. |
|
|
Replying to: docnukem (May 03, 2005 5:33 pm) The M will do fine over time - it will probably increase sales just like the G which started out slowly but has increased in sales every year since. In order for Infiniti to compete with Lexus they need a winning Q45. The LS has been such a fine (and good selling) automobile - it carries the entire Lexus fleet. So even though many believe the G is superior to the ES and the M is superior to the GS - no one believes the Q is superior to the LS. Infiniti needs to win the flagship car competition and enjoy the spillover effect on their other models. Plus they need a catchy slogan. The "relentless pursuit of perfection" or the "ultimate driving machine" are ingrained in many minds here. The GS has a history of starting out strong and then fading away. There was such a pent up demand for the car (it was due last year) that sales will be strong for awhile. There was NO demand for the M so I'm pretty sure Infiniti is happy with their sales so far. Will be interesting to see how these sales figures change over the next year or two. |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2007 Lexus GS 430
2011 Acura RL
2011 BMW 5 Series
2010 Volvo S80
2010 Audi A6
2010 Infiniti M35
2010 Infiniti M45
2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2010 Cadillac STS
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
