Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ
2851 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2009 at 5:36 AM
You are in the Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: tiger16 (Apr 06, 2009 11:25 am) Traded in my 2007 MKZ. I am very happy camper with all the technology, etc. |
|
| I have an 07 Mkz as well but have very low mileage so I'll wait another year to get the Milan hybrid. I think that Lincoln will lose many sales to Milan hybrid. | |
|
Replying to: brucelinc (Apr 03, 2009 5:21 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: tk329 (Apr 07, 2009 11:30 am) Anyway, in my previous post, I stated I would not purchase the 10 MKZ. I went to the site to "build" one to see if I could be lured back. I found out some more disturbing things. The highway gas mileage is down from last year - not good for me since my daily commute on I-95 is 82 miles round trip. I have the Nav system an THX 6 CD changer on my Zephyr. Guess what, you can no longer get the Nav with the CD changer! You either get the Nav OR you get the CD changer. The Nav only comes with a single load CD. Even the new $2500 THX/Nav pkg is only single play. That's exactly what I want to do going 65 mph down I-95 - fumble with CD cases while trying to eject & insert CDs. Funny that you can get the Nav with 6 CD changer in Lexus, Infinti and Acura (didn't check Cadillac). Anytime you take away something that was previously offered, it's a downgrade. Once again Ford fails to meet the competition. And after checking the competitions' sites, I just can't get excited about the "new" MKZ interior. It's still several notches below. Look at the ES or the CTS. Not even close. So, in the 2010 MKZ, we have a prop rod, no air vents for the rear seats, a degraded audio system, a cheap looking console, fewer color choices (no blue), less gas mileage, low profile hard riding tires and a price increase of about $2K. This thing is looking more and more like a train wreck.
|
|
|
Replying to: tiger16 (Apr 08, 2009 3:45 am) And the price increase is mostly due to options becoming standard like stability control. At least get your facts straight before you start bashing. |
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Apr 08, 2009 5:12 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: gregg_vw (Apr 08, 2009 8:16 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Apr 08, 2009 10:00 am) |
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Apr 08, 2009 5:12 am) Also, I said the base price increased by about 2K - THAT'S A FACT. Your comments about "things" now being standard is merely an attempt to justify the price increase. The problem with making certain things standard is you force people to pay for things they may not want. I'm sure there are potential buyers that do not want to pay extra for stability control or for sat radio or for cooled seats. My point is, adding more to the base price may not be good market strategy. Leave some things out and let the buyer decide if they want to pay for them. Your average buyer is going to look at the price of MKZ and Lexus and may very well say - I'll take the Lexus since it costs the same. Here are my other comments on the 2010 MKZ: Fewer exterior colors offered No rear air vents Less highway mileage than the 2009 Low profile tires Again, which of these statements is incorrect? My comments concerning the ugly, cheap console and degraded stereo are opinions. Not right or wrong but, opinions. I'll give you that. You told me to get my facts straight before I start bashing. One might suggest that you brush up on your reading comprehension skills so you understand what you read. That way you can more appropriately bash the post rather than the poster. Fair enough? One last thing concerning the Camry/ES thing. I have access to both. Family members have the Camry and a good friend has an 09 ES. I driven both. Toyota has done a good job separating the Lexus from the Camry. The Camry is no where near the MKZ but, the ES is nicer than the MKZ (my opinion). Other than some trim, I don't think there is much difference between the MKZ and Fusion/Milan.
|
|
|
Replying to: tiger16 (Apr 09, 2009 3:24 am) Just because your statements were "technically" correct does not make them less misleading. I'm with you on the lack of rear air vents and fuel mileage and I'll even grant you that the MKZ is not quite as nice as the ES (but I bet it handles a lot better based on the Fusion/Camry comparos). But it's not nearly as bad as you make it out to be. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2006 Lincoln Zephyr
2010 Lincoln MKZ
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
