Sign In Join 



What type of hybrid should I buy? - READ ONLY

453 messages,  Last post on Aug 19, 2005 at 6:05 PM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 29 of 46
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
46
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#281 of 453
I think by nippononly
Apr 20, 2004 (10:55 am)
what you perhaps don't realize:
 
"If price point is the only criteria then it seems an economical ; decontented Prius would have been offered."
 
is that the $20K Prius IS the economical decontented version, which is why package 9 costs almost $6000 and puts back in stuff that is already standard on the $20K Camry (plus adding other stuff). Those hybrid guts cost enough to have to make deep cuts to bring the car to $20K for base price. The NAV and Smart Entry you mention are not standard.
 
But the 2004 is definitely a better value than the "classic" Prius if only for its much larger passenger and cargo capacity.
#282 of 453
Re losing money by backy
Apr 20, 2004 (6:43 pm)
Toyota lost money on the classic Prius and makes very little on the current Prius.
 
This is not true. The fact that the classic Prius was a money-maker during the latter stages of its life has been well documented in the press. And how much is "very little"? This was said of the Prius by some posters even before Toyota raised the base price by $300. So take what the profit was before and add $300. Is that still "very little"? Any profit on a car in its first year of a redesign is pretty good IMO--there's the development and tooling costs to recoup.
 
Also, it is common in the auto industry for automakers to offer smaller, fuel-efficient cars to draw buyers into dealerships and to keep up their CAFE scores. Today's Prius buyer could be tomorrow's RX400h or Sienna hybrid buyer.
#283 of 453
Money by mirth
Apr 21, 2004 (9:05 am)
I just don't believe Toyota when they say they make money on the Prius.
#284 of 453
wouldn't it be by nippononly
Apr 21, 2004 (9:23 am)
criminal for them to lie about it? I mean, they have a board of stockholders to account to just like any other corporation...
#285 of 453
No... by mirth
Apr 21, 2004 (9:34 am)
...it's only criminal if they lie about the profits of the corporation in general (or it's individual companies), not about an individual product line. Also, it's pretty easy to play games with numbers in order to make a statement that, while not exactly a lie, isn't in the same ballpark as the truth either.
#286 of 453
There is a book something like, by boaz47
Apr 21, 2004 (9:58 am)
using accounting as a strategic tool. There are at least two sets of books Toyota has to report on. One is reported profit and the other is actual expenses. If you write off future gains from current expenses and discount government subsidies it can make the profit look much better to the public and the press. Sometimes the government might allow you to claim all the R&D as a tax write off. It is hard to say how a hybrid could be produced with much more expensive parts and still make a profit if on the same line you are making conventional cars, using the same assembly methods and those cars are only making a small profit because of volume. That isn't lying, as pointed out, because you only have to show net profit to the corporations board, not even the stock holders get all the information.
#287 of 453
by kirstie_h HOST
Apr 21, 2004 (12:08 pm)
Don't forget tonight's member-to-member chat - it's open mic night, so come and discuss whatever's on your mind.
 

 
http://www.edmunds.com/townhall/chat/townhallchat.html
 
6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET. Drop by for live chat with other members. Hope you can join us!
 
kirstie_h
Roving Host & Future Vehicles Host
#288 of 453
Remember, by usbseawolf2000
Apr 21, 2004 (7:53 pm)
Japanese government helped Toyota out, the same way Clinton administration used our tax dollars for the 70 MPG Super Car project. The result was concept Ford Prodigy, GM Precept, and I forgot the other one.
 
Dennis
#289 of 453
Parts is parts? by backy
Apr 22, 2004 (6:35 pm)
It is hard to say how a hybrid could be produced with much more expensive parts and still make a profit if on the same line you are making conventional cars, using the same assembly methods and those cars are only making a small profit because of volume.
 
I've never seen numbers on the cost of a conventional ICE drivetrain, like Toyota's VVT-i 4-cylinder from the Camry, with a 4- or 5-speed automatic tranny, compared to the costs of making the HSD powertrain in the Prius--including battery. Anyone know what the difference is? After all, the HSD powertrain are the only significant mechanical difference in the cars. And with the low prices of CRTs and computer chips, it's possible the Prius' controls and "by wire" technology is actually less costly than standard mechanical or electro-mechanical controls.
#290 of 453
by xcel
Apr 22, 2004 (6:53 pm)
Hi Backy:
 
___Although the following is loaded with extrapolations and goes beyond any amount of detail I have ever read on the economics of a Hybrid vs. std. ICE anywhere else, you may want to take a look at pages 111 – 117. I think the 04 Prius blew some of their conclusions out of the water (the HSD has to be much less costly then a std. automatic transmission) but if the prices of the Inverter, Power electronics, and the pack itself holds true to form, the Hybrid may never be cost effective.
 
http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/244.pdf
 
___Good Luck
 
___Wayne R. Gerdes

Messages Page 29 of 46
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
46
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement