You are here: Forums Future Vehicles Mercedes-Benz: Future Models

Mercedes-Benz: Future Models

441 messages,  Last post on Sep 15, 2007 at 9:01 PM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class, Mercedes-Benz R-Class

Messages Page 2 of 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#6 of 441 by merc1 Apr 04, 2004 (10:09 pm)
What exactly do you think they're looking for the CLS to do for them?   M
#7 of 441 response to merc1 by steven2 Apr 05, 2004 (4:16 pm)
"Three things Mercedes needs to do: improve reliability, stop with the under 30K model plans and never make and ugly car or veer off in a strange styling direction like BMW."   Wouldn't it be great if all of these luxury companies could improve their reliability? Unfortunately, only Lexus and Infiniti can say they have above-average reliability, and Lexus's arent "cool" enough for some and nobody buys the upper-end Infinitis. In my opinion, that's why people would by an MDX over a VW Touareg   Also, why not have a below- 30,000 dollar car? Many people buy the C-Class, even though its a terrible car. Fix it up, and have it compete with the 330's of the world.   Speaking of 330's, why not style like BMW? They are the best compact luxury car, ahead of the TL and G35. Plus, The average person would readily buy a 330-like car under the MB nameplate and not know it was a poorer version of a BMW if the price was right. Keep in mind, most buyers DON'T use Edmunds.com or Consumer Reports to purchase, so by targeting the clueless drivers they'd be selling to the majority.   The new wagon should have a partner sedan to go with it, to replace the poor C-class, and the new G-class, as merc1 suggested, should be styled more efficiently and should have an under 70K price tag.
#8 of 441 but of course by steven2 Apr 05, 2004 (4:18 pm)
Mercedes would never think that logically...they'd just come out with another convertible model.
#9 of 441 by sphinx99 Apr 05, 2004 (9:31 pm)
"What exactly do you think they're looking for the CLS to do for them?"   I think they're looking for it to maintain or increase market share for the overall brand. I don't think it'll do so, it'll merely present yet another option to those who already are sold on the brand, and in the process add yet more complexity (read: cost) to the design and manufacturing processes to support the product lineup.
#10 of 441 Main question not being adressed by steven2 Apr 06, 2004 (6:11 pm)
The main question or concern is, however:   Will this model bring in new customers, or customers who would not have bought a MB in the first place? Or will it take away from C, E, and even M class buyers? Inevitably it will lower not boost sales.   Can someone tell me what MB does not have that would sell very well and that they should have, seeing how the other luxury models have it? (Hint: Full-size, practical luxury SUV. I understand BMW has one in the makes, joining RR, LX470 and QX56) Replies to this message: benzsalesman (Feb 07, 2006 1:05 pm) merc1 (Feb 07, 2006 9:39 pm)
#11 of 441 steven2 by merc1 Apr 06, 2004 (8:44 pm)
Good points..... Yes I agree the CLS has the potential to take away buyers of both the E and S-Class, but also the CL or CLK, but I don't think it will. For one it looks like no other Mercedes and that should draw buyers into the MB fold that wouldn't have bought one before. The rear seat of the CLS is very impractical (2 pass) compared to the S or E-Classes, but it should provide more room than Mercedes' true "coupes".   I agree totally about the large SUV thing. I've wanted a Range Rover competitor since the day the M-Class was announced. Mercedes knows they want to build a 75-100K truck anyway, but they sold their souls to the volume market with the ML with disastrous (quality) results.   BTW, the 2005 C-Class is much improved in the area that it needed it the most, interior. Hopefully all those things under the skin that were unreliable have been dealt with also. Mercedes' philosophy about how a car should drive will never allow them to out-sport the 3-Series, so they need to give up trying to out-sport this car, just make the C-Class a reliable, high-quality, fun to drive car that can keep up with the 3-Series in that area, but make it more luxurious. That is correct the Mercedes formula.   sphinx99,   I don't think they're expecting it to do much for market share worldwide at just 50K units a year, which is a small drop in the Mercedes bucket. I think they did it honestly for more profit as the CLS uses mostly off-the-shelf E-Class parts (chassis, engine etc) with only the body and a very select few interior pieces being truly "new". I would imagine the CLS didn't cost much to develop.   M
#12 of 441 sphinx99 by merc1 Apr 06, 2004 (9:46 pm)
And it don't stop...lol.   http://www.mbusa.com/brand/aboutus/news/newsFrame2004.jsp   M
#14 of 441 Mercedes Benz by jchan2 Jun 10, 2004 (5:14 am)
has a few issues that I noticed at NAIAS early in the year to fix.   I opened the trunk on the C230 Kompressor sedan and the lid just flew up and almost twisted my arm. Geez. At least let the lid go up slowly. None of the other automakers had this problem, including Chevrolet, Suzuki, Hyundai, Kia and BMW. I opened the liftgate on a C230 SportCoupe and when I tried to close it the latch was jammed. Keep in mind this was a brand new $28,000 MERCEDES On every other car I sat in and opened the liftgate, there was no problem with the latch jamming. All the problems I encountered were at the Mercedes Benz display.   I do think the Crossover Concept they had on display was quite nice looking.
#15 of 441 by merc1 Jun 10, 2004 (9:30 pm)
Cars at autoshows are regularly abused. If owners were having these problems it would be all over the net.   M

Messages Page 2 of 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Future Vehicles Mercedes-Benz: Future Models