GMC Sierra Hybrid pickup - READ ONLY

100 messages, Last post on Sep 22, 2007 at 4:45 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? GMC Sierra 1500, Hybrid Cars

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 11: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; ...; 11; Prev; Next; Last

#5 of 100 True Hybrid by cowgyrl13 Feb 12, 2004 (5:32 pm)
I did find a write up about it. I was disappointed to know that there was only a 10 to 15% improvement in MPG. That is not much when you are already below 20MPG. I drive too far to justify the truck. That is why I got rid of my D-Max. Looks like we'll just have to stay truckless. DOD? Replies to this message: nvbanker (Jul 01, 2004 3:52 pm) rfruth (Jul 01, 2004 4:20 pm) nvbanker (Jul 02, 2004 1:40 pm) and 3 more...
#6 of 100 sooner or later by rfruth Feb 12, 2004 (5:50 pm)
GM is a day late and a dollar short when it comes to hybrids, yea there are hybrid fleet vehicles now but nothing for the rest of us and even the fleets get some half baked mild hybrids with DOD (displacement on demand) Ya GM is hyping hydrogen and I have some Ballard power systems stock (Ballard is big into fuel cells) http://www.ballard.com and thus I would love to see the hydrogen economy take off for a number of reasons but there are several big obstacles that need to be overcome first.
#7 of 100 by 6thbeatle Feb 12, 2004 (9:05 pm)
i wish every auto manufacturer would start building hybrids. we all love cars, but i'm sure we all love the continued good health of our family, friends, pets, and the whole lovely planet even more.
#8 of 100 maybe they aren't worth it by evbo Mar 25, 2004 (9:54 pm)
GM may be finding that they don't really deliver on improved fuel economy? A hybrid requires extra "parts", and thus they weigh more. These "parts" help it get better fuel economy in specific conditions, like on the EPA city test, but hurt fuel economy when its driven in other conditions. I suspect they will delay/suspend introduction for this reason. For a clear understanding of hybrid technology in layman's terms, read the book "Common Sense Not Required." Available at Amazon. Replies to this message: mcats (Jul 02, 2004 4:15 am)
#9 of 100 Yes! Available to retail customers this fall. by Sylvia STAFF May 06, 2004 (9:16 am)
GM Delivers First Full-Size Hybrid Pickup http://www.greenwichtime.com/business/investing/sns-ap-gm-hybrid-- pickup,0,5412379.story?coll=sns-ap-investing-headlines
#10 of 100 Re: True Hybrid [cowgyrl13 #5] by nvbanker Jul 01, 2004 (3:52 pm)
Replying to: cowgyrl13 (Feb 12, 2004 5:32 pm) Agreed, this nominal increase in MPG will never justify the extra money. And I'm afraid of two things - one, this is just like GM to bring this out the cheap way and give us no real advantage, and second, I'm not sure hybrid technology is going to work in larger vehicles, so it's not going to last. Replies to this message: rfruth (Jul 01, 2004 4:20 pm) nvbanker (Jul 02, 2004 1:40 pm) gagrice (Jul 02, 2004 2:01 pm) and 2 more...
#11 of 100 Re: True Hybrid [nvbanker #10] by rfruth Jul 01, 2004 (4:20 pm)
Replying to: nvbanker (Jul 01, 2004 3:52 pm) Bet you saw the whopping 1 MPG increase GM just announced http://wardsauto.com/ar/auto_gm_truck_tweaks/index.htm yep it is just like GM to go with a half baked idea and in the mean time Toyota & Honda are cleaning up, hope Ford with the Escape hybrid will join the fray cause hybrids are here to stay til a better solution comes along and there's nothing on my radar screen (hydrogen but that could take awhile) now, how about you ? Replies to this message: nvbanker (Jul 02, 2004 1:40 pm) gagrice (Jul 02, 2004 2:01 pm) molokai (Jun 29, 2005 5:39 am) and 1 more...
#12 of 100 Re: maybe they aren't worth it [evbo #8] by mcats Jul 02, 2004 (4:15 am)
Replying to: evbo (Mar 25, 2004 9:54 pm) The author, Evan Boberg, doesn't understand hybrid technology all that well... all cars will get different fuel economy figures under different conditions. The "parts" argument is bunk... at least for Toyota's hybrid system. The Prius HSD's power split device is deceptively simple... it's not really a transmissions, 'per say.' Look at John1701a's posts for more details. As for the Prius fuel economy: http://homepage.mac.com/priustech/Prius/Menu9.html www.john1701a.com
#13 of 100 Re: True Hybrid [rfruth #11] by nvbanker Jul 02, 2004 (1:40 pm)
Replying to: rfruth (Jul 01, 2004 4:20 pm) I'm not positive that Hybrid is going to endure yet. There is some promise of efficiency here, but only in small cars, and mostly in town. Probably good for comuters, but there's a lot of doubt in my mind that the extra cost and added weight and complexity will be compensated for in mileage unless you drive a lot of miles every day. I have more faith in diesel at the moment. Clearly though, this GM hybrid truck is a joke. I can't believe they ever brought it to market! Replies to this message: gagrice (Jul 02, 2004 2:01 pm) molokai (Jun 29, 2005 5:39 am) gagrice (Jun 29, 2005 6:01 am)
#14 of 100 Re: True Hybrid [nvbanker #13] by gagrice Jul 02, 2004 (2:01 pm)
Replying to: nvbanker (Jul 02, 2004 1:40 pm) I think the only real selling point is the built in Gen Set. It sure isn't the economy. I'm wondering if they will ever make it to the average consumer. Replies to this message: molokai (Jun 29, 2005 5:39 am) gagrice (Jun 29, 2005 6:01 am)