You are here: Forums SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4

BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4

1193 messages,  Last post on Apr 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM

You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? BMW X3, Subaru Forester, Infiniti FX35, Toyota RAV4, SUV

Messages Page 2 of 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 120 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#8 of 1193 hp doesn't actually equal speed by jjman Jan 22, 2004 (10:40 pm)
It seems like every Infiniti (and Nissans) have engines with high horsepower quoted and granted the fx35 specs do look overpowering at 280hp and 270lb/ft but for some reason all that power doesn't seem to go directly to the wheels.   So far perfomance numberwise I have seen at best 7.6 0-60 numbers from the publications for the fx35. For the x3 Car and driver got 7.4 which looks decent until you consider the 3.0 engine only has 225 hp and 212 lb/ft in which case that is pretty good. Ok so they did have a manual version but then add .5 secs and you are still looking at good acceleration for a 2 ton vehicle that is behind 55hp and 58 lb/ft to the fx35 I guess my point is the fx35 does not blow away the x3 for power. The fx35 is actually slow for its power numbers.
#9 of 1193 jjman by zman Jan 23, 2004 (3:23 am)
"Besides who cross shops bmw's and subarus?"   I do. I am.   In the areas that matter to me, function and performance, the XT and the X3 are worthy comparisons, each with apparent strengths and weakness (on paper). I'm a manual transmission guy, so the vast majority of the AWD SUVs, mini or otherwise, are out of the running, especially when I am seeking a vehicle with any level of high performance capability.   FYI: Forester XT MT is in the mid 5 second range for 0-60.   Zman
#10 of 1193 My FX35 v. X3 3.0 Dilemma by vsroman Jan 23, 2004 (6:22 am)
I want to buy but I can't decide! These are the items I have looked at with respect to the two vehicles.   Fuel Eff - X3 3.0 auto 16/23 v. FX35 16/22 (a draw)   Cargo Room - X3 30/71 v. FX35 27.4/65 (edge X3)   HP - X3 225 v. FX35 280 (edge FX)   0-60 - X3 3.0 7.9 sec v. FX35 7.1 secs (edge FX)   Sunroof - X3 pan roof v. FX35 norm sunrf (edge X3)   Road Handling Index - X3 .88 v. FX35 .81 (edge X3)   Looks - X3 nice, likely to age well, FX - sleek, menacing head-turner, but maybe too trendy? (draw - I'd be happy driving both)   Price - X3 3.0 43K v. FX35 37K Price is for sim eq, mostly loaded except nav and dvd. Also, assumption is X3 is selling for MSRP per my dealer, FX price is based on ads in local paper and the FX forum. Some on this forum have indicated up to 1500 off msrp for x3 so that may close the gap from 6k to 4.5k. (edge FX)   Service - X3 free 3+ yrs - FX approx $750 (edge X3)   Warranty - x3 4yrs, 50K v. FX 4yrs, 60K miles (Edge FX - this for me equates to a full 4 years as I drive 15K per year)   Safety - both sb good/excellent (draw)   My questions to the forum:   Am I missing any other important criteria?   Should I rule out the X3 2.5? This would close the price gap but one of my favorite things on the road is the ability to quickly leave a situation, the 65 - 85 acceleration factor. X3 2.5 states 0-60 in 9.3 :<   Are there any former BMW drivers now driving the FX35? I'd love to hear your thoughts.   I'm currently driving a 99 528i w/sport pkg.   Next steps - On vacation next week in Fl. and I have reserved an FX for 3 days. Think I'll drive it over to a BMW dealer and do a side-by-side comparo! Also, would love to test the X3 in a warm climate with the pan sunrf wide open.   Thanks for your posts!
#11 of 1193 zman by ballistic Jan 23, 2004 (6:49 am)
Not sure why I didn't see this until today; you posted it on the 18th. Anyway,   is a 6-speed what you think Subaru needs to put into the XT?   There are 2 possible solutions, 1 easy, 1 expensive and unlikely.   The easy, inexpensive one would be to put the WRX 3.9 final drives into the XT, leaving everything else the same. The 5-speed's 1st gear is low enough to handle this, and each of the other gears would definitely benefit from the taller ratio.   The expensive, unlikely solution would be to put the STi 6-speed into the XT - but it would do no good unless the entire ratio set was revised. The STi 6-speed has fairly close ratios, good for track work. The XT needs a low 1st (for off-road) and a tall 6th (for decent MPG and lower-RPM highway cruising). In other words, the XT needs wider, more-spread ratios than what the STi gets. I don't think it's likely that Subaru will invest in a different 6-speed gearset just for the XT.
#12 of 1193 wide-ratio 6-speed by rsholland Jan 23, 2004 (6:56 am)
If the Legacy GT gets a 6-speed down the road (which is rumored), it could well make it's way into the FXT too. The more models Subaru can offer it in, the lower the unit cost per item.   I'm not sure it will be a "true" wide-ratio unit, but perhaps the gear ratios might be a tad wider than what's found on the STi.   Bob
#13 of 1193 Besides who cross shops bmw's and subarus by lbhaley Jan 23, 2004 (6:59 am)
I would have crossed shopped the two if the X-3 had been available when I bought the XT. Having read the X-3 tests I know I would still have bought the XT. I just can't resist that power! I had excellent luck with my 98 Forester S, so I was leaning towards buying another Subaru anyway. All that money I saved is certainly nice too. I have owned five different BMWs at various times. I love the way they drive but they have nothing on Subaru when it comes to reliability, functionality, and now with the XT, performance.   -les
#14 of 1193 Bob, by ballistic Jan 23, 2004 (7:43 am)
The current STi 6-speed ratios might be fine for the Legacy GT, aimed more at sporty on-road driving than at the Forester's mix of on- and off-road utility. It's the latter usage that would really need a low 1st and high 6th.
#15 of 1193 BMW X3 vs Forester XT by ballistic Jan 23, 2004 (7:45 am)
The BMW's lifetime cost for service and repair work is likely to be several times greater than for the XT.
#16 of 1193 JB by rsholland Jan 23, 2004 (7:50 am)
With all the power the XT has, I don't think a deep low first gear is necessary. I see your point though. Maybe this could be addressed with the 6-speed XT having a slightly lower final drive (4.11?) than a Legacy GT (3.90?). I know this goes counter to your wish for a 3.90 final drive, but with a 6-speed, and revised internal gear ratios, a 3.90 may not be necessary for the Forester, given its mission in life. I would think you would still get more relaxed cruising, better gas mileage, and a better selection of gear ratios.   Bob
#17 of 1193 Bob, by ballistic Jan 23, 2004 (7:56 am)
I didn't mean to suggest that a 6-speed XT would need a lower 1st than is already on the 5-speed (although some might want that for boat towing or rock hopping). What I meant is that a 6-speed in an XT would probably want the overall ratio in 1st to be about where the current one already is, whereas 6th would want to be substantially taller than 5th is now. Maybe as much as 30% taller. That would require a wider-spaced gearset than what's in the STi, but the latter's current closer-ratio set might be OK in the Legacy GT as is.

Messages Page 2 of 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 120 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4