You are here:
Forums
SUVs
BMW X3 & X5
BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4

1193 messages, Last post on Apr 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM
You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: kumari (Jan 12, 2006 1:58 am) Len
|
|
|
Replying to: kumari (Jan 12, 2006 1:46 am) Not necessarily, the BMW has a 5th gear overdrive so the engine revs much lower than the XT at highway speeds. |
|
|
Subaru Forester is one of only 6 SUVs and the only small SUV to earn a good rating for protection against whiplash injuries in rear-end crashes. Excerpts from article: ARLINGTON, VA — Only 6 of the seat/head restraint combinations in 44 current model SUVs are rated good for protection against whiplash injuries in rear-end crashes. None of the seat/head restraint designs in 15 pickup truck models earns a good rating. Overall 4 out of 5 SUV and pickup seat/head restraints recently evaluated by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety are rated marginal or poor for whiplash protection. This is the first time the Institute has tested SUV and pickup seats using a dummy that can measure forces on the neck during a simulated rear-end crash. Only the seats in the Ford Freestyle, Honda Pilot, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Land Rover LR3, Subaru Forester, and Volvo XC90 models earn good overall ratings. "Manufacturer advertising often emphasizes the rugged image of SUVs and pickups," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "However, the Institute's evaluations show seats and head restraints in many models wouldn't do a good job of protecting most people in a typical rear impact in everyday commuter traffic." Seat/head restraints in the Volvo XC90 and Subaru Forester earn good overall ratings, in part because of their advanced designs that help keep the head and torso moving together in a crash. As an occupant's torso sinks into the Subaru seat during a rear crash, a mechanism in the seatback is designed to push the head restraint up and toward the back of the head. Full article is here: http://www.highwaysafety.org/news/2006/pr010806.html -Frank
|
|
|
Replying to: p0926 (Jan 13, 2006 12:24 pm) Bob |
|
|
Replying to: leo2633 (Jan 12, 2006 5:35 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: kumari (Jan 14, 2006 6:27 am) -Frank |
|
|
The boxy shape means it's more useful than you might think, mine fit an oversized clothes dryer, box and all, on its side (pic below). The hatch even closed. -juice
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 17, 2006 12:56 pm) Anyway, plenty of room on the sides but from ceiling to floor was a little snug (the fact that it was stuffed with probably 130 lbs of assorted junk didn't help). The hatch still closed, barely though. If it had been any more angled it wouldn't have shut. Doug
|
|
|
Replying to: dstew1 (Jan 18, 2006 8:09 am) -juice
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 18, 2006 1:30 pm) Yay for the easy-clean cargo mat. My rubber mat is actually the excuse my brother used for not wanting to load it into his Pathfinder (it was mostly HIS stuff) when taking it to a dumpster - "But yours will clean out easier!" Fortunately nothing spilled!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
BMW X3 & X5
BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 BMW X3
2010 Subaru Forester
2010 Infiniti FX35
2011 Toyota RAV4



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats