You are here: Forums SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4

BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4

1193 messages,  Last post on Apr 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM

You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? BMW X3, Subaru Forester, Infiniti FX35, Toyota RAV4, SUV

Messages Page 112 of 120 1 ... 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 120 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#1104 of 1193 Re: Wheels, [melbourne #1103] by petewat3 Jun 24, 2004 (4:12 am)
Replying to: melbourne (Jun 23, 2004 6:28 pm) Incidentally while the Outback has good ground clearance, its not very effective over rocks because its wheelbase is long. Its overhangs are also poor as well, so the Outback is not regarded here as being as Outbackable as a Forester.   The 2005 Outback will go from 7.3 in. clearance to 8.5 I hear. With the bumpers raised about an inch. The Highlander is the same platform as the Altima and the RX300/330 and not designed for heavy off-roading. Interesting, if heavy off-roading is important to you, why aren't you looking at truck-based SUVs (body on frame)? Replies to this message: melbourne (Jun 24, 2004 5:38 pm)
#1105 of 1193 by ateixeira Jun 24, 2004 (8:40 am)
melbourne: actually yes, our automatic Forester do get a standard oil cooler.   It fits on the MT5 models as well, but doesn't come standard. SoA found it wasn't needed because the towing capacity for the manual is actually greater even without the oil cooler.   2005 US Outbacks have 8.4-8.7" of clearance, very good actually.   The 2004 Forester has 7.5" but better approach/departure angles, like you said. The 2005 model is supposed to get even more clearance but I haven't been able to confirm this yet.   Bob - you said you got a brochure, right? Does it mention that?   Back to the comparisons, BMW invited me to the X3 Ultimate Driving Event, I'm registered for August 6 here in DC. Bob Holland is going with me.   I have a Forester, Bob has an Explorer but a few Subies in his family. We've both driven the Forester XT so perhaps we can do a little compare/contrast after the event.   -juice Replies to this message: rsholland (Jun 24, 2004 11:14 am)
#1106 of 1193 Still 7.5" juice... by rsholland Jun 24, 2004 (10:40 am)
but towing is now 2400 for all Foresters. Last year n/a Forester automatics were rated at 2000.   Bob
#1107 of 1193 Re: [ateixeira #1105] by rsholland Jun 24, 2004 (11:14 am)
Replying to: ateixeira (Jun 24, 2004 8:40 am) We've both driven the Forester XT so perhaps we can do a little compare/contrast after the event.   Maybe we should drive the F-XT again just before (or after) the event again, so our comments would be more accurate. I haven't driven the F-XT in over a year, so my recollection isn't fresh. Also, there have been some minor updates on the F-XT since last year.   Bob
#1108 of 1193 Re: Wheels, [petewat3 #1104] by melbourne Jun 24, 2004 (5:38 pm)
Replying to: petewat3 (Jun 24, 2004 4:12 am) " if heavy off-roading is important to you, why aren't you looking at truck-based SUVs (body on frame)? "   Because we already have a truck based frame chassis Toyota vehicle. The attraction of a 4 wheel powered vehicle is for the snow, and the none chassis frame vehicles use much more fuel to get to our snow fields, about 5 hours one way 70 MPH.   We have had the new 2005 Subaru Outbacks since last year. Because we are right hand drive, we get the Japanese vehicles earlier than you. Yes the Outback has been raised, despite a lower centre of gravity by lowering the engine. I did not know about the bumper angle change. Nonetheless it is the type of vehicle that would not climb a rock without hitting it. It would be fine for going along wide tracks in open country, because you can steer around rock outcrops on the big tracks (tracks that go to central Australia were aboriginal trading highways and followed water courses in what are deserts). They are quite wide and flat, and dressed with broken up rocks. The Outback would be fine out there. But steep tracks would catch it out, whereas a Forester is much better because of its shorter wheelbase, which is critical in avoiding the centre of the vehicle scraping on a rock which one was to climb over.   For us, both vehicles would be city cars that do quite a few country trips to the snow.   Somehow I think the Outback although more expensive would be a nicer place to be. I imagine it quieter, and its more roomy in the back seat for our 12 year old who will be six foot by the time we change vehicles.   I figure the Forester is better in acceleration, which is a fantastic benefit, and also the Forester sits higher than the Outback, which is more pleasant for the driver in traffic, and safer too. But I worry about the Forester's room for out son, whether it could take three people in the back (my parents) and whether it is a noisy almost harsh environment.   We trialed a WRX before buying the BMW 325, and the WRX was quite a harsh environment. However the only reason we did not by it was because the seats when raised in height did not support the lower back at all - they were extraordinarily uncomfortable. We asked Subaru, and they came back with nothing could be done. We could not even put in the standard car's cheaper seats. We then priced spare parts, as the STI had a bottom seat part that was raisable on the front and back of the seat, which provided support for the lower (small) of one's back. But the parts cost the same as new Recaros, about $US1,000 per seat. Not worth it - 10% of the value of the car in seats was silly.   We later found out that dealers had solved the problem, by putting in an air bladder behind the lining of the seat, with a one way air valve that you hand squeezed until one got the back support. The device cost $US35 per seat!
#1109 of 1193 by ateixeira Jun 25, 2004 (5:59 am)
Bob - we should drive an FX, especially. Let's find out if there is an Infiniti dealer in that area.   I can't drive another F-XT. Too tempting!   -juice
#1110 of 1193 Wife's opinion X3 V Forester And my view backs seat by melbourne Jun 27, 2004 (6:11 pm)
My wife drove several cars over the weekend.   She said the X3 had the advantage of being very familiar in its controls (sas she has a current 3 series BMW).   She liked the two tone colour scheme of the BMW, as it had dark colours below elbow height, which was pleasant and clever she thought.   She said all the vehicles she drove were very good which surprised her. She felt the BMW was just not worth it (In Aus. they are quite expensive).   We very much liked the Forester. It offers a great compromise between sitting high and good handling.   It was not noisy. The seats were comfortable. The rear compartment good for our two Jack Russel dogs, although in reality its dark interior would show their cream doggy hair. A black rubber mat would be bought anyway.   Its external appearance compared to most others really poor; it seems that Subaru have just decided to forego style. It gains no emotive points from its body shape. It may be logically justifiable, but it does not capture the heart, like a Rav4 does for instance.   Interestingly, my wife has crossed the Subaru Outbacks off her list. Mostly because from the driver seat, it is low. Because of traffic driving, if she is to have a rear compartment for two dogs or sailing gear, she'd like the lest claustrophic benefits of sitting higher, which the Forester does much better than the Outback.   Also, we found the back (middle compared to 7 seaters) seat in the Forester more comfortable than the Outbacks seats. Firstly the Forester's almost bench seats were higher off the floor, and the Outbacks seats' felt flat and shallow under the bumb. A disappointment for their upper model. Also with three in the back, the middle position was quite hard in the Outback compared to the even comfort bench bottom seat of the Forester.   The Subaru guy said one should spend $US700 on a Japanese wider exhaust system for the Forester, as the Jap system bolts perfectly in. Its wider diameter lowers back pressure and results in much greater performance for the turbo.   He also said that on has to idle the motor up for a few minutes before driving off in the mornings, and idle the motor down at the end of your journey, to keep the turbo bearings healthy, and also to change to double the factory recommended engine oil change interval, and to use a top synthetic oil. Such care would ensure much longer turbo bearing life. Replies to this message: edunnett (Jun 28, 2004 7:55 am) melbourne (Jun 28, 2004 2:08 pm)
#1111 of 1193 by ateixeira Jun 28, 2004 (6:24 am)
Forester XT has a two-tone interior in the US as well, it's nice.   Stock XTs dyno in at around 240-250 hp, so in the US it's understated. With an ECU reflash, people are getting 260-280hp from a stock motor with no mods, but say bye-bye to your warranty.   -juice Replies to this message: melbourne (Jun 28, 2004 7:51 am)
#1112 of 1193 Re: [ateixeira #1111] by melbourne Jun 28, 2004 (7:51 am)
Replying to: ateixeira (Jun 28, 2004 6:24 am) Juice, in aus. now the dealers are selling the add on bits which improve performance. The were so many hot up shops around improving "Rexs" that the dealers thought they were stupid missing out on all the action. so now your dealer will do it, you keep your warranty, and their bits also meet pollution standards. I don't know about insurance though ...   And the Forester interior is two shades as well, and is dark down low. But the X3 is beige up top, and dark grey low; light and airy up top, and servicable down low. The Forester is really two shades of grey, but its still a well built "honest" interior.
#1113 of 1193 by ateixeira Jun 28, 2004 (7:53 am)
SPT has sold parts for a while in the US, only now did they start to cover them under warranty.   I actually don't usually like a beige/gray combination but I'll get to see it up close in August at that event I registered for.   Cheers.   -juice

Messages Page 112 of 120 1 ... 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 120 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3 vs Subaru Forester XT vs Infiniti FX 35 vs Toyota RAV4