Sign In Join 



Toyota Tundra New Owner Reports

1965 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 6:49 AM

You are in the Toyota Tundra Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Toyota Tundra


Messages Page 54 of 197
1
...
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
...
197
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#528 of 1965
Re: From Toyota's launch release today [kdhspyder] by 1972ck
Jan 07, 2007 (9:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Jan 07, 2007 9:31 am)

Wow! You were on the ball & fast! Thanks for posting the info. kdhspyder! I couldn't get logged in to Edmunds
fast enough.
I was disappointed Toyota didn't release pricing. The Flexfual tid bit for '09 is interesting. I was hoping for some kind of hint on the diesel Tundra also. No such luck this weekend.
#529 of 1965
Re: Oops, there it is! [drfill] by kdhspyder
Jan 07, 2007 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Jan 07, 2007 9:33 am)

Agreed on the new Double Cab
 
Originally Posted by willy
I checked Toyota's website and for clarity when he wrote "2006 C-cab" he was referring to the '06 Access cab. I have included that data again, plus added in the '06 Double Cab interior specs. This is basically the information I have been waiting for most. Things are looking pretty sweet...
 
2007 C Cab REGULAR BED vs 2006 Access Cab vs 2006 Double Cab
 
Wheelbase ..145.7" vs 128.3" vs 140.5"
 
Interior Dim
Head room f/r .. 40.2/38.7 .. vs .. 40.3/38.3 .. vs .. 41.2/40.2
leg room f/r ...... 42.5/34.7 .. vs .. 41.5/28.6 .. vs .. 41.6/37.5
shoulder room f/r .. 66.6/64.7 .. vs .. 62.4/63.2 .. vs .. 62.1/62.2
hip room f/r ...... 63 / 62.6 .. vs .. 59.3/56.6 .. vs .. 59.7/58.3
 
So, compared to the '06 Access cab, the '07 C-Cab has 1.0" more front leg room, and 5.9' more rear leg room.
 
Compared to the '06 Double Cab, the '07 C-Cab has a wheelbase that's 5.2" longer, 0.9" more front leg room, and 2.8" less rear leg room.
 
The CrewMax isn't an option for me since it comes with a 5.5" bed. It looks like the C-cab will likely suit me just fine! Sweet!
 
added:
Good addition by adding the comparo to the 2006 Double Cab..
 
To complete the 3-way comparo.
 
Wheelbases ==> Turning Radius
2007 C Cab ..... 145.7" ==> 44'
2006 Acc Cab .. 128.3" ==> 44.3'
2006 Dbl Cab ... 140.5" ==> 47.0' DING!!!
 
The new C Cab ( 2007 Double Cab ) is far larger than the prior 2006 Access Cab and is just about the same size inside as the prior 2006 Double Cab but it turns and handles better than the 2006 Acc Cab.

 
Collabrative post from Ts earlier today.
#530 of 1965
Spec's for 2007 Toyota Tundra 2x4 Double Cab by iqbaldhillon2
Jan 07, 2007 (12:29 pm)
Reply
2007 Toyota Tundra 2x4 Double Cab
 
 Engine: 5.7 L V8 32 Valves
 Horsepower/torque: 381hp/401 lbs ft torque
 Towing: 10,600 lbs
 Payload: 2050 lbs
 Tires: 18"/20"
 Seating: 6
 Speakers: 6
 Transmission: 6 speed auto.
  
 Let's see Chevy, Ford, and Dodge do that! Toyota Tundra in my eyes will sell around 300k-450k units! Toyota dealership will have the Tundra's in showrooms by January 22, 2007!
#531 of 1965
No AWD by nickel
Jan 07, 2007 (1:33 pm)
Reply
In my case, is a dumb idea from Toyota not to offer AWD capabilities on the Tundra. When you only have one car, you should have the possibilities of using it on light snow or rain with the security of AWD. I have a Subaru, but need a pickup, so I've been waiting for the Tundra. Now only the Ridgeline (hate the style and steering mounted stick) and the Dakota (no way) have it.
#532 of 1965
Not enough demand by drfill
Jan 07, 2007 (1:40 pm)
Reply
Since you are the first person I've ever heard in 30 years ask for AWD on a full-sized P/U, I guess you will have to go forward and multiply.
 
  Good luck, mine friend.
 
  DrFill
#533 of 1965
Nice, Nice, Nice . . . by serranot
Jan 07, 2007 (2:53 pm)
Reply
Very nice, it will do very very well. I am in the market soon and will likely get one.
 
Two things I don't like--the pod-centric design of the gauge cluster, and the lack of availability of a larger fuel tank. The fuel tank thing is imporant to me, and 26 gallons is not a lot.
 
Nice truck, though. Head and shoulders above others.
 
Regards,
Tom
#534 of 1965
Re: Not enough demand [drfill] by kdhspyder
Jan 07, 2007 (2:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Jan 07, 2007 1:40 pm)

I think he took a wrong turn at the closed down Midsized Sedan thread..
#535 of 1965
4x4 is still good by iqbaldhillon2
Jan 07, 2007 (4:26 pm)
Reply
You can use a 4x4 with TRD off road package. Beside 401 pounds feet of torque along with 381 horsepower will turn snow into water it's alot of power.
#536 of 1965
Re: 4x4 is still good [iqbaldhillon2] by 1972ck
Jan 08, 2007 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: iqbaldhillon2 (Jan 07, 2007 4:26 pm)

Nicely said. It's a good thing Toyota has included traction control w/ the ALSD. With those torque numbers your gonna' need something to assist with wheel slippage. Smoke 'em if you got 'em!
#537 of 1965
Re: 4x4 is still good [1972ck] by iqbaldhillon2
Jan 08, 2007 (6:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 1972ck (Jan 08, 2007 6:04 am)

Next month I'm getting a 2007 Toyota Tundra w/ 5.7 L hell with the Ram. The Tundra also looks better. Toyota Tundra 2x4 w/ TRD off road Double Cab in Gray!

Messages Page 54 of 197
1
...
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
...
197
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement