Sign In Join 



Owe more than it's worth... I'm upside down and I can't get up!

1160 messages,  Last post on Oct 22, 2009 at 7:11 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Leasing


Messages Page 116 of 116
1
...
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1151 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [dgs4] by cdnpinhead
Oct 12, 2009 (5:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: dgs4 (Oct 11, 2009 5:10 pm)

Frugal, smart, responsible car shoppers don't role (sic) negative equity into a new car, period.
 
I can be just as self-righteous as the next person in this conversation (I don't own a Pious yet though, so I've got room to grow), but I've got to think that the reason this thread has gone basically dead is that upside-down financing isn't offered so much anymore and/or people have decided they can hang on to their present cars for awhile longer than they might have two years ago.
 
Like you, I didn't realize there was such a thing as upside-down financing until a few years ago. Since an auto loan is supposed to be secured by the value of the vehicle, it seemed a pretty dangerous practice to me. It was done all the time though, maybe most of the time, until a year or so ago.
 
Maybe it still is -- I don't know, but I doubt it.
#1152 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [dgs4] by shipo
Oct 12, 2009 (5:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: dgs4 (Oct 11, 2009 5:10 pm)

There are times when rolling negative equity into a new car is appropriate or desirable. Speaking strictly for myself, I won't do such a deal as a general rule, however, back during the summer of 1993, I leased a new Ford Probe GT 5-Speed only to find out not twenty-four hours later that my wife and I were expecting our first child (to say we were shocked is an understatement). Eighteen months later when our son graduated from an infant seat to the smallest forward facing booster seat we could find, it became painfully obvious that he wasn't going to fit back there for even a month or two and the search for a new car began. In the end, I wound up rolling the remaining portion of the lease into a new 1995 VW Passat GLX 5-Speed.
 
This turned out to be an even better deal for me than it might have as I ended up driving the Passat well over 100,000 miles during the term of the four year lease. "A good deal?" some might ask, "What about the charges for the excess mileage?"
 
I paid no excess mileage charges. Why? Apparently the 1995-1997 Passats had a problem with the instrument cluster where it would gradually burn out and lose all memory of the miles driven. When I turned my Passat in at lease end, there were only eighteen miles displayed on the new instrument cluster (the third since the car was new), and the VW service records only recorded enough miles to add up to something like 50,000 miles.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#1153 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [shipo] by kirstie_h HOST
Oct 12, 2009 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Oct 12, 2009 5:48 am)

Ha! You're the first person I've heard of who's actually benefitted from the widespread electrical issues associated with VWs.
 
I wonder whether consumers are getting smarter, and realizing that being upside-down is rarely in their best interest? It'd be nice to find out that that's the case, rather than finance companies saying "no." Dealers?
#1154 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [kirstie_h] by shipo
Oct 12, 2009 (6:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: kirstie_h (Oct 12, 2009 6:04 am)

Funny thing, I actually gave VW a chance to do it right.
 
When the instrument cluster was in the process of failing for the second time, but before the odometer was completely unreadable, I took the car in and requested another new cluster. They said, "No" without even a second thought. I countered with my assertion that the instrument clusters were a "known issue" and since it had already been replaced under warranty it should be replaced again. They laughed in my face and told me that they wanted something like $1,200 for the parts and the work.
 
I turned to a local shop that specialized in VWs and had the job done for $500 (including the purchase of the new cluster). When VWoA called me after the car had been turned in and asked me to "estimate" how many miles were on the car, I stuck to my guns and asked, "What do your service records show?" In the end, my final lease disposition paperwork showed eighteen miles on the car at turn-in. I have no idea why they didn't add the initial (documented) seventeen thousand miles from the first cluster to the thirty some thousand miles that were on the second cluster during the cars' last visit to a VW service department, but they didn't and that was okay by me.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#1155 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [dgs4] by volvomax
Oct 14, 2009 (3:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dgs4 (Oct 11, 2009 5:10 pm)

Why would any bank want to finance negative equity on a fast depreciating asset like a car? If I were a loan manager I would not take any loan application that had negative equity in it.
 
The short answer is that NO deal is sent to a bank with negative equity showing.
the numbers are massaged to show either a neutral trade or trade equity.
One of the reasons why trade in values here and places like KBB are off.
the selling price of the new car is raised.
The problem now is that banks aren't doing 100% financing for the most part. They won't do 100 or 120% of MSRP or retail book anymore, so hiding neg equity is much harder.
#1156 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [volvomax] by british_rover
Oct 16, 2009 (10:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Oct 14, 2009 3:16 pm)

Chase won't even finance 100% of invoice on a new Saab anymore and they won't finance longer then 60 months.
 
I think the max they will do is 70% of invoice.
#1157 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [british_rover] by volvomax
Oct 16, 2009 (11:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Oct 16, 2009 10:36 am)

Yikes!
$ucks to be a SAAB dealer.
#1158 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [british_rover] by grandtotal
Oct 16, 2009 (12:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Oct 16, 2009 10:36 am)

Is that because Saab is 'going away'?
#1159 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [volvomax] by british_rover
Oct 16, 2009 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Oct 16, 2009 11:51 am)

I know
 
Back a few years ago if we did 40 Volvos a month then we did 30 SAABs. We can still hit 15 or even 20 Volvos on a good month but only get four or five SAABs.
 
We did do eight SAABs last month were probably number one SAAB dealer in the country too. We don't know though cause GM canned our rep back about a month ago and we didn't get a new one until just last week. Didn't even tell us they fired him just noticed one day that we never got emails from him anymore.
#1160 of 1160
Re: 'upside-down-ness' [british_rover] by roadburner
Oct 22, 2009 (7:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Oct 16, 2009 12:05 pm)

My wife has always wanted a SAAB and I'm willing to give them a look now that they are no longer part of An Amerikan Revolution- AKA Government Motors...

Messages Page 116 of 116
1
...
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement