You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan
Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan 2005+

1422 messages, Last post on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM
You are in the Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
Replying to: sadvan (May 12, 2008 3:54 am) It also happens to us more when it's wet out. Did you ever get a resolution? |
|
|
Just completed a 2500 mile trip in my 2007 T&C LX (3.3L). Fuel economy ranged from just over 21 mpg to a high of 27.4 mpg. Also had a tank at 26 mpg and another half-tank at 25 mpg. I found that the fuel economy was dependent on wind and speed (duh). Three tanks at 21, 22, and 22 mpg were achieved with a strong headwind and speeds between 70-75 mph. The 27.4 mpg tank was achieved with an hour of 55-60 mph speeds, but the rest of the day at 70-72 mph, mild temperatures (50s-60s), and almost no wind. The 26 mpg tank was under similar conditions but a little faster speed. The van was fully loaded with five people, a dog, and the rear compartment stuffed up to the top edge of the 3rd row seat. If gas had been closer to $4/gallon rather than $1.35-1.55 a gallon, I might have watched the speed more to get better fuel economy. But with 8-12 hour days on the road, even a few mph more made a significant difference in arrival time, so I gladly paid the price at the pump. This was our first long trip in the T&C and it proved a great cruiser, with a smooth ride (15" wheels) and also quiet, except when we were heading into a 30-40 mph headwind. The driver's seat was very comfortable. I spent some time in the middle row and those seats weren't bad, but the cushions are noticeably firmer than in the front. My daughter staked out the 3rd row with our dog and they were very comfortable back there. All the power points came in handy for our portable DVD player, cell phones etc. |
|
|
Returned recently from an extended vacation to the desert southwest from Wisconsin, driving our 2006 Grand Caravan. Overall fuel economy was 23.44. Best tank was 26.58. Worst tank was 20.99. Several legs of the trip included extensive mountain driving during which the fuel economy interestingly didn't suffer much. In fact the worst tank was on the drive west from St Louis to Tulsa. We must have had strong head winds during that stretch. We generally kept the speed on the freeway stretches at the speed limit of 70 or 75 mph in the western plains. I am pleased with the mileage, given the size of this vehicle. The 3.3 V-6 had all it could handle in the mountain driving, and if I drove in those conditions on a regular basis, would consider a larger engine version, but in our normal fairly flat daily driving, it is just fine. No vehicle problems during the trip whatsoever. It is only now at 25K on the odometer.
|
|
|
Replying to: badgerfan (May 14, 2009 6:22 am) We recently completed a 4500 mile trip from Alaska to Pennsylvania with a '98 DGC AWD (3.8L). We averaged 21.7 mpg, with best tank at 24.6 and worst at 19.7. As with you, the worst tank was driving across South Dakota, running at 79 mph, and bucking head cross/head winds. It was a great trip. We clocked 200,000 miles just about the time we crossed the PA border. I think the 3.8L engine has plenty of power in all situations. We ran with a fairly heavy load of cargo, but the van felt quite peppy nonetheless. |
|
|
Hi all - I've got a 2006 Chrysler Town and Country Touring with about 53,000 mi. on it. Last week the oil light started coming on - nearly at 3months/3000 miles on the nose. Today took it in to have oil changed - repair shop says there was no oil on the dipstick and they only drained about 1 qt. There are no obvious leaks and no signs (smoke, etc.) of consumption. They don't (at this point) have any idea what is causing the consumption. Repair shop advises monitoring weekly - and having them do it and document so that everything is documented in case there is an issue and we need to file a claim with the extended warranty company. Has anyone seen anything like this? Thoughts about what might be causing and/or what we should do? Thanks!
|
|
|
Replying to: tlkiser (May 18, 2009 11:24 am) Regular monitoring by you will help a shop determine if a problem does exist. Otherwise, like us, they are left to speculate.
|
|
|
Replying to: dm3 (Jul 24, 2006 1:29 pm) Thank you for any help you can provide. We're in a real "pickle". Carol Parent
|
|
|
Replying to: cparent (May 29, 2009 12:04 pm) I have no real complaints. Though, to be honest, I really wanted a Honda Odyssey, but could not justify the price difference between it and the DGC. |
|
|
Replying to: xwesx (May 18, 2009 2:26 pm)
|
|
|
I recently took my 2007 T&C LX in for its 60k mile servicing. I had some surprises, some pleasant and some not so pleasant. On the pleasant side, there was very little that needed attention. The serpentine belt looked good, the plugs are supposed to be good for 100k miles (per the dealer), the transmission fluid looked good, and other than the oil change and air filter replacement and a thorough check, there was little to do. Even the OEM Goodyear tires still had some life in them (more on that in the Tires & Wheels discussion). Except... the tie rod ends were worn to the point the dealer recommended their replacement. I was shocked that tie rods would need to be replaced on a 3-year-old van with 60k miles. Second, the front brakes needed replacement. I could understand how the pads would need to be replaced, but the dealer said the rotors could not be resurfaced and needed replacement also. Total was about $700. So while I am pleased that the van has very low scheduled maintenance costs for 60k miles, I am not too happy that parts like tie rod ends and front rotors should need replacement so soon.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan
Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan 2005+
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chrysler Town and Country
2010 Dodge Grand Caravan



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats