Sign In Join 



Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan 2005+

1422 messages,  Last post on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM

You are in the Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Grand Caravan, Van


Messages Page 113 of 143
1
...
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
...
143
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1116 of 1422
Re: Could this be the 2007-8 Chrysler minivan? [fish8] by shipo
Feb 07, 2006 (8:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: fish8 (Feb 07, 2006 8:02 am)

Hmmm, I very much like the looks of both the current generation and previous generation DC minivans, which is a good thing because we have one of each. That having been said, I like the photo that might could well be the next generation. To me at least it looks like the current van with a Magnum roof line and the schnozzel of a Chrysler 300C (which isn't a bad thing as far as I'm concerned). All in all, I really like the picture.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#1117 of 1422
Re: Could this be the 2007-8 Chrysler minivan? [shipo] by marine2
Feb 07, 2006 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Feb 07, 2006 8:13 am)

I sort of like it. What I really want to see is the inside. That is where Chrysler has been falling down.
#1118 of 1422
Re: 5W-20 vs. 5W-30... [shipo] by micweb
Feb 07, 2006 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Feb 07, 2006 4:10 am)

I've been thinking about the Mobil 1 0-40 for my own minivan, with the 2.4 4 cylinder engine which I am afraid beats the heck out of its oil due to the demands of propelling a 2 ton minivan.
 
Mobil 1 0W-40 is a European spec formula which emphasizes engine protection and long oil life instead of maximum fuel economy, which is typical of most European spec oils (although you indicate it DOES pass the SAE "SM" requirement, which has at least some fuel economy - friction modifier - requirements).
 
One of the things I learned about this oil, when I had a couple of VW's that required it, is that it is formulated at the "thin" end of the 40 weight specification, so it is only a little thicker than a typical 30 weight oil, and should therefore have a neglible effect on mileage.
 
BTW, unless an oil is loaded up with unstable viscosity index improvers, which a full synthetic won't be, the important number for "warmed up" operations is the second number - don't get scared off by the "0" part of the multi-grade (or by the "5" in typical oils).
 
True, if you are buying a cheap dino oil (house brand Autozone, or Walmart's Supertech), then a 10-30 might hold its viscosity on the freeway in the desert better than a 5-30 from the same blender, and might be closer to "30" after 3,000-5,000 miles of driving have sheared down the viscoscity index improvers - but if you have full synthetic, those oild WILL stand up to heat better, hold their grade a lot longer, and seldom shear down to a thinner weight.
 
That's one of the reasons I think full synthetic oil changes are the way to go, and since Walmart offers them for about $30 including parts (the oil itself is $25-28 of that, depending on the current sale price for the oil), labor, and fluid top-offs, there's no real financial reason for shortchanging the quality of lubricants we run in our vehicles.
#1119 of 1422
Re: Could this be the 2007-8 Chrysler minivan? [marine2] by micweb
Feb 07, 2006 (11:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: marine2 (Feb 07, 2006 9:31 am)

I saw the same picture of the supposed 2007-2008 minivan on another site, and on that site the poster admitted it had been composed in Photoshop. I think it's a better job than most enthusiast modifications (both in terms of Photoshop technique and having an eye for what works in design terms), but this is DEFINITELY not a spy photo of an actual "mule" car on the road.
 
On the other hand it could be a good guess - Chevy just made their minivans more "truck-like" in appearance and the manufacturers are, in general, desperate to "take back" the minivan from soccer moms (which is kind of silly, since soccer moms have moved on to SUV's anyway) and make them more "man friendly." (I'm not making this up, sadly.)
#1120 of 1422
Re: 5W-20 vs. 5W-30... [micweb] by shipo
Feb 07, 2006 (11:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: micweb (Feb 07, 2006 11:25 am)

I used the Mobil-1 0W-40 in both of my BMWs, and even a couple of times in our vans. By all accounts, that stuff is pretty great oil, and while I cannot provide any anecdotal evidence either way, I can say that it is also fairly hard stuff to find. Back in the 1999-2002 time frame, the only place I was able to get it was Park Place motors in the Dallas area. In more recent times AutoZone has started carrying it, and *sometimes* I can even find it on the shelf, as such, I usually opt for 0W-30 or 5W-30 for our DGCs.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#1121 of 1422
Re: 5W-20 vs. 5W-30... [shipo] by frogger123
Feb 07, 2006 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Feb 07, 2006 4:10 am)

But do these Mobil-1 0W oils meet the Chrysler spec?
#1122 of 1422
Re: 5W-20 vs. 5W-30... [frogger123] by shipo
Feb 07, 2006 (9:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: frogger123 (Feb 07, 2006 7:47 pm)

Good question. FWIW, I don't personally care, however, I did check both of our manuals and here is what is said:
 
1998 DGC 3.8: API Certified (For Gasoline Engines) -- 5W-30 or 10W-30
2003 DGC 3.8: DaimlerChrysler MS-6395 -- 5W-30 or 10W-30
 
Now, here is the wierd thing, the only oils that I can find that meet the DC MS-6395 spec are 5W-20 oils. Go figure.
 
If that isn't confusing enough, then there is the latest spec from DaimlerChrysler 229.1/229.3/229.5, and the only oils that I can come up with that match that spec are fully synthetic 0W-40 offerings (such as Mobil-1 0W-40). So, my question is, "Does the 229.x standard superceed the MS-6395 standard?" I snooped around a little and couldn't find an answer to that one.
 
Regardless, based upon everything that I've read, Mobil-1 0W-40 (and other 0W-40 fully Synthetic oils that meet the 229.x standard) are simply the best oils on the market for anything shy of all out hot weather racing.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#1123 of 1422
Re: 2005 Town & Country and Grand Caravan [theo2709] by dsireme
Feb 08, 2006 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: theo2709 (Dec 08, 2003 10:45 am)

I am ready to kick Chrysler right where it counts! I had a 1999 and just loved it so when they came out with the stow and go seats, I had to have it. I bought a 2005 Limited LOADED... $43,000. Now don't get me wrong, I love the van and if it wasn't for that, it would have been gone by now. I have had problems with the visor (replaced twice), the electronic start, the positioning - first the seat, now the mirror and radio. The passenger side door came off the track while we were in the middle of the Smokey Mountains. And my U-Connect would break up if I turned the volume up.
 
Now my BIGGEST problem is my radio. I have the Satellite/GPS model. I have been come very addicted to Sirius. Well I can get in to my car, turn it on and get static from Sirius. At first I thought it was clouds or interference but after a while I took it in to be looked at. They couldn't find anything and it started happening again. I noticed that the radio would also lock up and I couldn't even turn it off.
 
Now sometimes if I stopped the car, turned it off, opened the door to shut off the radio and then restart the car it would fix it. But not always. I will finally maybe after driving 10 mins. People must think I am nuts at stop lights, turning off my car and opening/closing my door.
 
Of course because this happens only when it wants to and the dealer is a town away, I can't show it to them. They did replace I think it was the antenna, but that didn't do any good. The poor guy at the Chrysler dealer wants to bad to help me but he his hands are tied by Chrysler.
 
So I called Chrysler today told them everything that has happened and how unhappy I am and they still will not replace the radio because when the techs look at it, it is fine. So I told the girl I will video tape it next time, either that or get rid of the damn van. The problem is, I love it too much and I don't think I can depart with it.
 
So I am curious, has anyone else had any problems with their radios at all, or is it just my bad luck as usual.
#1124 of 1422
Re: 2005 Town & Country and Grand Caravan [dsireme] by fish8
Feb 08, 2006 (10:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: dsireme (Feb 08, 2006 9:15 am)

We have had no problems with our '05 Touring's radio.
 
On a side note, please tell me you didn't pay $43,000 for your Limited? I tried to build one online and it is almost impossible to build one to the $43,000.
#1125 of 1422
Re: Could this be the 2007-8 Chrysler minivan? [micweb] by heavydoe
Feb 08, 2006 (10:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: micweb (Feb 07, 2006 11:29 am)

I have been on that web site before and they state that they had an artist draw what he thought the new Caravan would look like from the 2 spy photos they have. So don't count on the new one looking anything like the picture. We'll all have to wait until next year to see it.

Messages Page 113 of 143
1
...
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
...
143
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement