Sign In Join 



Depreciation: Foreign vs Domestic Vehicles - READ ONLY

70 messages,  Last post on Jul 24, 2007 at 9:30 AM

You are in the Smart Shopper-Archives Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 6 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#43 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [jipster] by advequityguy
Jul 19, 2007 (9:34 am)

Replying to: jipster (Jul 19, 2007 4:41 am)

And buy the way, if you paid 15000 for a Focus, that's gotta be the most expensive freeking Focus of all time.
#44 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [advequityguy] by jlawrence01
Jul 19, 2007 (12:36 pm)

Replying to: advequityguy (Jul 19, 2007 9:34 am)

And buy the way, if you paid 15000 for a Focus, that's gotta be the most expensive freeking Focus of all time.
 
While I would not do it, there are a lot of Ford Focus sold for $15k or more. The sticker on a fully loaded top-end model is $17.6k when I last entered a Ford dealership ... and that would be one of the WORST new car purchases.
#45 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [jlawrence01] by advequityguy
Jul 19, 2007 (12:42 pm)

Replying to: jlawrence01 (Jul 19, 2007 12:36 pm)

That's what I'm saying. A nice Focus with power equipment stickers for about 16k with a $2500 rebate. That would make it about 13 and a half if you pay full sticker price. If you actually paid 15 back in 2002, I think you set the record, which leads me to believe this story isnt exactly true.
#46 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [advequityguy] by british_rover
Jul 19, 2007 (2:27 pm)

Replying to: advequityguy (Jul 19, 2007 12:42 pm)

What were programs like back in 2002 though? There might not have been much rebate money on the Focus then or it might have only been towards the end of the model year. He also might have had some accessories put on and is counting those in with the purchase price which he really shouldn't do since they offer zero value come trade time.
#47 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [blueiedgod] by metro123
Jul 19, 2007 (4:22 pm)

Replying to: blueiedgod (Jul 19, 2007 3:49 am)

I don't remember the Civic Si's selling for $14,500. Weren't they really hot cars selling for closer to $19,000?
#48 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [metro123] by british_rover
Jul 19, 2007 (4:28 pm)

Replying to: metro123 (Jul 19, 2007 4:22 pm)

Good point. I just checked cars.com and it lists Civic SI hatchback starting MSRP at 19,000 dollars.
 
I doubt Honda had that much in incentives on the Civic back then although I suppose it is possible since the SI hatchback was a very unloved vehicle.
 
CIVIC SI MSRP
#49 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [advequityguy] by blueiedgod
Jul 20, 2007 (9:54 am)

Replying to: advequityguy (Jul 19, 2007 9:33 am)

The MSRP on the 2002 Civic Si was $19,400 (invoice was about $17,600). Honda was running a "marketing incentive" to clear out the 2002 Civic's in addition to the 1.9% APR.
 
Yes, my Si was listed on the dealer's website for $15,000 within 3 days. I assume they sold it for $14,000, it was gone from the lot a week later, when I went to check on her.
 
I almost always buy my Hondas when Honda has "marketing incentive." Right now Accord is a great buy, since with the incentive it is cheaper to buy a brand new Accord than it is to buy a 3 year old used one.
 
I bought the CR-V for $20,500, which is about $500 over dealer's cost after you factor in the "marketing incentive" Honda had on the CR-V at the end of March of 2005.
 
As to the Focus, the deal was either to take the rebate or get 0% financing. She chose Financing. We are not talking today, this was all done in 2002, when Ford was not in deep red as it is now.
#50 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [jipster] by blueiedgod
Jul 20, 2007 (9:57 am)

Replying to: jipster (Jul 19, 2007 4:41 am)

Well, I would have to question your numbers a bit. But, I agree that it wasn't a wise finacial decision for your girlfriend to sell her Focus. She should have held onto it for another 3 or 4 years.
  
I have one for you though:
  
8 year old Olds Cutlass Supreme: Paid $1,500...owned 7 years... sold it for $750. $1,500 - $750 = $750 for 7 years depreciation. Not to bad for a domestic huh?
Was a very nice car when I bought it, not so good when I sold it.

 
I have a better one.
 
Circa 1995: Bought a 1985 honda Civic DX hatchback for $1,500. It had 200,000+ miles on the clock. Drove it for 3 years, sold it for $1,600 with over 250,000 miles. $100 APPRECIATION in 3 years.
#51 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [blueiedgod] by advequityguy
Jul 20, 2007 (11:08 am)

Replying to: blueiedgod (Jul 20, 2007 9:54 am)

Ah. My truth sensor is tingling now.
 
In effect, you chose 0% on the Focus instead of taking the $3000 rebate. In effect, you paid 12000 for your 2002 Focus, but you chose to take a finance incentive because the payments would be lower. Now that makes sense. 3 years later (and unknown mileage), a $6000 - $6500 trade value would be about right, using the ole 50% in 3 years for a car that does a good job of holding value rule. It does not sound to me like the Focus did that bad of a job.
 
As far as the Civic goes, something still doesnt sound right. First off, I'm not sure of the difference between MSRP and invoice on a Civic, but I'm thinking its probably a little less than you stated. Normally, low end cars dont have very much markup, but I'm too lazy right now to verify this point. My original point remains. If Civic were going for $14500 back in 2002, and had a trade value of $12500 3 years later, that would lead to some wierd math. First off, that would mean 3 year old Civic were selling for $500 less than new Civics (after you figure in shop costs and pack). I'm not buying that one. Secondly, it would also mean that a lease on a 2002 Civic should have run you about $65 per month on a 3 year lease. I'm thinking the lease payment on one back in 2002 was probably a little more than that.
 
I'm going to go out on a limb and make some assumptions as far as the Civic goes. First off, I'm thinking that in reality, It probably cost a bit more than $14500. The dealership may have told you $14500, but I'm guessing there's a couple thousand hidden in there somewhere - perhaps an ad unit? I'm also gonna take a stab at it and say that that same dealership offered you more for trade on it than anyone else, mostly due to tham sneaking an extra couple grand in on the backside of your CRV. Let's face it, though the Civic does a pretty good job with depreciation, there is no car on Earth that depriciates at a rate of $700 per year like you are claiming. Maybe a collectible car, certainly not a production car. And I'm thinking no one is collecting 2002 Civics.
 
Pony on up to the bar and admit you were exaggerating just a bit.......all will be forgiven.
#52 of 70
Re: Honda vs. Ford [advequityguy] by exb0
Jul 20, 2007 (1:15 pm)

Replying to: advequityguy (Jul 20, 2007 11:08 am)

I believe, blueiedgod. My father-in-law just sold Carmax his 98 Civic LX 4dr w/ 60K on the clock for $4500, that he paid $13K for it new. Carmax put it on the lot for $10K. I don’t know how much Carmax sold it for, but I am sure it’s more than 8K. Carmax is not stupid; they flip more cars than anybody else. People are willing to pay stupid money for Civics, because they are just like the Energizer bunny, keep going and going…

Messages Page 6 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement