You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Honda S2000
Honda S2000

604 messages, Last post on Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM
You are in the Honda S2000 Forum. Your Host is claires
|
It's just a slight redesign for 2004. The frame stays the same but Honda says it has more interior room. I think that only means resculptured door panels for a little more elbow room. There's not much room for any other addition of space that I can see since they kept the frame identical. No mention of a tilt steering wheel. 17" vs 16" rear wheels, 2.2 vs 2.0 engine with a bit more torque and 1k lower red line, same horsepower. Redesigned front and rear panels. Softened? or different suspension at least. I think you're still out of luck for more room. That's what you get for exceeding the 90 percentile limits of size. |
|
|
|
| blacktalon---you'd be at home in Europe. They much prefer the coupe version of a car for sporting driving and for the track. You rarely see a droptop in European amateur racing. | |
| http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/roadtests/firstdrive/100600/articl- e.html?tid=edmunds.h..reviews..19.* | |
| the s2000's can be had with a hard top.... | |
| but the name is still officially s2000 !! | |
|
|
|
From everything I've read, Honda has managed to do the near impossible -- make the S2000 a much better daily driver while keeping it just as fast on the track and through the twisties: - More torque - More usable power - Better ride - Greatly reduced tendency for snap oversteer - More rigid body - 17" tires - Similar or better 0-60, 1/4 mile, and track times - Similar or better roadholding Despite my preference for fixed-roof coupes, the S2K is rapidly climbing to the top of my must-drive list... |
|
|
Ditto - believe it or not, I am hoping to check one out the next time I have to visit the dealer for scheduled service. You forgot to mention the improved stereo Any idea when the '04s will be available, if not already? |
|
|
I had the opportunity to test droive the new 2004 S2000 and chat with a Honda regional rep who is a serious enthusiast. My take - echoed by him - is that the new S2000's impprovements, while looking good on paper, are almost indetectible. In my opinion, the "more torque" and "more useable power" were not as evident to me as the lower redline. The 2004 did not seem as quick as my 2002, but that may be because it only had 300 miles on it. I noticed no difference whatsoever in the handling. There probably is a difference, buut I suspect you need to take the car to a track or be a much more aggressive driver than me to notice. Don't get me wrong, the 2004 S2000 is a nice logical refinement of the original. But it's no cushy sports car and it's torque won't be mistaken for a Boxster S. If I were in the market today, I'd buy it for exactly the same reasons I bought a 2002. P.S. As far as the stereo goes, I never turned it on, so I can't comment on that. |
|
|
I've got an '03 S. Haven't driven an '04 but read lots of posts elsewhere by those who have bought them. I think "much" better daily driver is an overstatement. I never really got the lack of torque issue. Sure it's not up to par with the competition torquewise, but it's a high reving engine with a 6 speed manual transmission. One expects to be shifting a lot. I think "lack of torque" was a mantra that got repeated so much that Honda felt they had to do something. It ain't that much more torque. The '04 is probably an improvement over earlier models but it's still got the original spirit and isn't a good daily driver for lots of folks. But, boy is it fun and you can get a nice factory hardtop as an expensive option. I'm not a stereo buff but it wouldn't be hard to improve the stereo in my '03. And '03 was an improvement over the original. You owe it to yourself to go try one. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Honda S2000
Honda S2000
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Honda S2000



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats