- #590 of 604
-
Re: used s2000 [estreka]
by accelerator
-
Dec 13, 2007 (12:51 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Dec 13, 2007 12:36 pm)
I researched the TireRack and found some flattering reviews for some alternative tires (the name escapes me at the moment). Thanks for notice.
|
- #591 of 604
-
What to look for in a used S2000?
by rebmo
-
Sep 27, 2008 (6:30 pm)
-
|
I'm looking to buy a used 2004-2005 Honda S2000. What are the things to look for that might be a problem? A stock no winter lower miles silver not kiddie beaten is what I am basically looking for. I am in no hurry either, just looking for tips on any issues or hints of abuse.
TIA, Reb
|
- #592 of 604
-
Re: What to look for in a used S2000? [rebmo]
by estreka
-
Oct 07, 2008 (5:30 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rebmo (Sep 27, 2008 6:30 pm)
The biggest things I've noticed with the S2K are the top, the rear differential, the clutch, and the paint.
The top is subject to a great deal of abuse, so it's only logical for it to be the first part that breaks down. The mechanicals are fine, but the fabric (and particularly the foam liner) are prone to failure. The foam liner on the passenger side of my S needs replacement, but it's not necessary. I get some extra road noise and it will leak under a high power hose.
The rear differential (known as the 'pumpkin') has been known to fail under hard acceleration. Replacement is relatively cheap ($1,100 for the part, about 2-3 hours, labor). Now, keep in mind, this isn't a part that has a high failure rate, but it does happen. To give you an example, my S is heavily modified yet I've never busted the pumpkin. I even snapped an axle in half (at a point where it's solid 1.25" metal!) yet the rear diff was unscathed.
Next, the clutch. I have to replace mine every 25-30K miles, but I'm putting down a lot more power than stock. I'd expect replacement every 90-100K miles. The stock clutch runs around $200. Unfortunately, the task is rather labor intensive due to a requirement to shift the entire engine forward. Expect high labor costs.
Finally, the paint. The S2000 has a rather thin clear coat. Pay special attention to how well kept the exterior looks. Also, ask.
All in all, my 4 years of ownership have cost me $2,070 in mnx (excluding tires and oil). That's pretty darn cheap! Especially for a modified model.
|
- #593 of 604
-
Re: What to look for in a used S2000? [estreka]
by accelerator
-
Oct 13, 2008 (7:10 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: estreka (Oct 07, 2008 5:30 pm)
I have a 2007 model with about 18,000 miles and I am just now looking at replacing the rear tires (front look new). estreka is right about the top. That seems the be the most common item I hear about too. What estreka is talking about is a part of the fabric rubs against the metal pivot points which wears a hole in the top. The wearing will be be towards the top rear of the top when you and is hard to find unless you are looking for it. You may want to try googling that for pictures of what to look for. My S is still too low of mileage to be of any real concern for me. I would also like to add that not only are the paint and thin coat are thin but so is the sheet metal. I swear it is about as thick as a coke can (not really but sure seems like it). The thin metal allows for lighter weight but is subject to door dings easily. Otherwise, the only advice I could give is to drive it. If it feels tight and little or no rattles and shakes, you are probably in good shape. Be sure to drive with the top up too (with radio off). The cabin doesn't have much insulation but it will help you listen for "stuff." The S's radios are weak, that is a given. No need to test that except to see if it turns on or not. 
|
- #594 of 604
-
Collectable
by FOHIO
-
Jan 28, 2009 (5:05 pm)
-
|
|
I understand that 2009 will be the last year for the S2000, any thought on the possible collectability and value of the the 1st production year or any year for that matter?
|
- #595 of 604
-
Re: Collectable [FOHIO]
by fedlawman
-
Jan 28, 2009 (6:05 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: FOHIO (Jan 28, 2009 5:05 pm)
You're joking, right?
|
- #596 of 604
-
Re: Collectable [fedlawman]
by FOHIO
-
Jan 29, 2009 (3:35 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jan 28, 2009 6:05 pm)
Not really, I haven't personally heard of this being the last year but I heard it from a guy who is pretty reliable...must be BS based on your response
|
- #597 of 604
-
Re: Collectable [FOHIO]
by accelerator
-
Jan 29, 2009 (7:17 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: FOHIO (Jan 29, 2009 3:35 pm)
In the s2ki.com (north texas chapter), there is a guy who posted stating this was the last year and the color choices were very limited. I think only Black for base and white for C/R. I guess a quick check to teh honda web site could validate the color choices. Rumors as to the last year of production have been lingering since at least 2005. Due to the economy and the killing of the new NSX, perhaps Honda will keep the S2K around a little bit longer.
|
- #598 of 604
-
Re: Collectable [FOHIO]
by fedlawman
-
Jan 29, 2009 (7:47 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: FOHIO (Jan 29, 2009 3:35 pm)
Well, Porsche stopped building the 914 in 1976. 30+ years later, I've yet to see a 914 at Barrett Jackson... 
|
- #599 of 604
-
Re: Collectable [fedlawman]
by FOHIO
-
Jan 31, 2009 (3:21 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jan 29, 2009 7:47 pm)
You've got a point but I think the limited number of those will the Carrera engine still bring a good buck but they are hard to find. As for the Honda, I guess I'm a little bias since I own one but I still think it has a ton performance and handling technology for a reasonably priced sports car. The numbers sold in the US aren't that high thats why I thought they could someday be in demand. If they do go away I guess I could hang on to it for another 10-15 years and hope.....after all who would have thought that Studebakers would be collectable!
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles 
