Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles Honda S2000 Honda S2000
604 messages, Last post on Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM
You are in the Honda S2000 Forum. Your Host is claires
|
Replying to: tametiger (Sep 28, 2006 9:28 pm) Of course, the lack of cargo space could be a problem if you regularly need to haul large packages, but the trunk certainly will hold a full supply of groceries, a weekend suitcase, or two or three small-medium sized boxes. There's room for you and one passenger, of course, so you should also think about that. The ride quality is really comfortable considering it's a sports car. It never crashes over bumps or bottoms out, so in terms of ride, it makes for a fine commuter car. The car is noisy, so long drives (more than 3 hours) could be uncomfortable. In most circumstances, however, it is no problem. I actually like the noise. It maintains the "raw" feel that I like. If you're concerned about affordability, I'd go for the 2006. From what I understand, there are no significant upgrades from 06 to 07. As far as lease options, I really don't know much about that. I prefer traditional financing. That way, I can drive as much as I want without worrying about mileage charges. One additional thing to think about is operating costs. It has good fuel economy (23-26 mpg), but it uses premium gas. The car also eats tires much more rapidly than the typical car. Expect to have to change at least your rears every 10-15K miles. Your insurance costs will also go up since it is a sports car. Overall, it is a fantastic car, and I love it. Puts a smile on my face every time I drive it. It's a purchase you definitely will not regret. Just be sure you go into it aware of the limitations and ready to make the necessary compromises.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: eliyale (Sep 28, 2006 10:07 pm) I get a lot worse gas milage (around 20 , best tank 21, some highway and some city and lots of VTEC) and mybe it is becuase I put on Indvidia exhaust which is much louder than stock. Also good investment Rick's Voodoo shift knob $35 screws down lower by 1/2 inch than stock. worst accesory is cargo net; absolutley worthless. drink cup holder is pretty bad too but hey who needs to drink and drive a sports car. My insurance cost went up bu not bad lessthan $1000 a year for very high level of coverage; but I am old and have other cars. Excellent car! MidCow |
|
|
Replying to: tametiger (Sep 28, 2006 9:28 pm) That said, you'll love taking the S2000 up through the twisties on your way up to Sedona (but pack light).
|
|
|
Replying to: vinnyny (Sep 30, 2006 3:42 am) My decision to buy this car hinges primarily on the affordability question. Maintenance costs, such as tire wear mentioned previously, and gas costs, as well as the initial cost of the car are factors going into my decision. By the way, I can't understand why tires should wear faster than any other car, as long as you aren't "burning rubber" every time the light turns green. Perhaps when considering purchase of this type of car the old adage applies "If you have to ask, you can't afford it."
|
|
| Newbie: Only one comment: the S2000 is a great car, but you have to treat it with respect and learn its characteristics. It has the power to easily break the rear end loose in a curve and you can switch ends in a hurry if you get on the gas too much. To consider buying: I live in Texas and find the AC works well - cools off interior reasonably quickly even in those few times I have parked outside in the sun for a long period of time. Tires will wear faster because they have a soft compound to increase their grip. You could get longer lasting, harder, replacement tires, but I would do so with great caution if you do any aggressive (fun) driving. | |
|
Replying to: jatdee (Sep 30, 2006 12:23 pm) It seems that maintenance costs are a significant factor for you... I think if the majority of your driving is going to be freeway commuting, and cost is a concern... then the S2000 is probably not the right car for you.. no matter how great it actually might be.
|
|
|
Replying to: tametiger (Sep 30, 2006 8:35 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jatdee (Sep 30, 2006 12:23 pm) " It has the power to easily break the rear end loose in a curve and you can switch ends in a hurry if you get on the gas too much. " Actually with VSA , 2006 and newer this is mno longer true. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 01, 2006 7:07 am) MidCow 2006 Red S2000
|
|
| Thinking in terms of what kind of engine honda would introduce to its leading sports car is questionable. Larger in what way, displacement or cylinders. All would agree a 2.4L 8-cylinder F-1 engine revving to 22rpm's would be sick in a honda. Although unrealistic, trickle down technology could introduce a "larger" engine without significant weight changes albeit massive power gains. | |
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles Honda S2000 Honda S2000
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Honda S2000
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
