You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Honda S2000 Honda S2000

Honda S2000

604 messages,  Last post on Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM

You are in the Honda S2000 Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Honda S2000, Convertible

Messages Page 14 of 62 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 62 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#122 of 604 S2K 0 to 60 article links / clint by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (9:32 am)
Here is another link to an article that Car & Driver did that makes it clear to everyone (hopefully) about the 5.4 - 5.5 second time. And, titan, please read more carefully.   http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=16&article- _id=7274&page_number=2   This is what the car is able to do which doesn't mean every driver could pull it off. I thought that would go without saying, but obviously it didn't. Every 0 to 60 time is solely the potential a car has depending on how good the driver is. Some cars have a larger margin of error for driver skill than the S2000, as well.   clint - That does sound like a tempting deal, with low mileage and the first version of the S2K that comes with rear window. Your insurance would obviously be lower too on the '02.
#123 of 604 titan by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (10:13 am)
Usually when people say "wheels", they mean "tires" . When they mean "rims", they say "rims". Out of all the things to spend money on, one would think the Honda stock rims are fine enough (and to most, they easily are) to save $2K. Your two reasons that are making you hesitate from getting an S2K are the rims and the lack of panache a Honda has? Are you kidding me?! C'mon...please. Sounds rather superficial. At least the cut-off switch is a safety concern...even though I still go with what I said earlier. If a person gets a smaller vehicle, not to mention a roadster, you are sacrificing a lot of safety anyway. The passenger seat WASN'T INTENDED for little kids...otherwise, Honda would have put a cut-off switch like they do in their other "family" vehicles. Since it was unnecessary, again for cost reasons, it didn't make much sense to include it in the vehicle. But, thanks for explaining to me why there is a passenger seat. Mind boggling. Geez!
#124 of 604 For Good Measure by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (10:37 am)
Here's an Edmunds (First Drive) article concerning the 2004 S2000 stating the 0 to 60 time at 5.5 seconds. There's your references.   http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/honda/s2000/100348367/roadtestart- icle.html?articleId=100600&tid=edmunds.e.roadtests.content...- Honda*   Quote: "Honda claims that 0-to-60-mph times slip down to "less than 6.0 seconds" with the new engine, and since Edmunds has had previous S2000s scooting to 60 in as quick as 5.8 seconds the carmaker is probably being conservative. The new S2000 feels quicker and likely hits 60 in about 5.5 seconds."   This, of course means, the S2000 out accelerates the Porsche Boxster S.
#125 of 604 More on behalf of Titan by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (10:45 am)
http://www.honda-acura.net/forums/archive/index.php/t-113958.html   Quote: "So let us consider the original question. The S2000 is a bit quicker accelerating to 60 mph than the Boxster S, and they are virtually identical to 100. ("But, officer, it was only in the realm of scientific research.") Their top speeds are virtually identical, panic stops from 60 mph are within a foot of one another, and the Boxster beats the S2000 on the skidpad."
#126 of 604 Z4 by kyfdx HOST Aug 05, 2004 (10:47 am)
The Z4 has a cutoff... most pickup trucks have cutoffs.. the Boxster has a cutoff.. There is really no excuse for the S2000 to NOT have one.... A passenger seat is just that.. for a passenger. No minors allowed? I think not.   regards, kyfdx
#127 of 604 More on behalf of Titan by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (12:48 pm)
http://www.honda-acura.net/forums/archive/index.php/t-113958.html   Quote: "So let us consider the original question. The S2000 is a bit quicker accelerating to 60 mph than the Boxster S, and they are virtually identical to 100. ("But, officer, it was only in the realm of scientific research.") Their top speeds are virtually identical, panic stops from 60 mph are within a foot of one another, and the Boxster beats the S2000 on the skidpad."
#128 of 604 kyfdx by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (1:02 pm)
Cost is an excuse. Honda figures most people who would buy this type of car won't have minors with them. I wouldn't want the price to increase for something I don't even need. If you are set on having minors ride with you, then by all means, get the Z4, Porsche Boxster or most pick-ups. Leave the S2000 for those of us who could care less.
#129 of 604 by kyfdx HOST Aug 05, 2004 (1:16 pm)
If you have children, you shouldn't buy an S2000? Hmmmm... interesting concept. You should be in marketing.
#130 of 604 kyfdx by carliker Aug 05, 2004 (2:05 pm)
Pretty simple concept for most too though I'm not really sure what your point is.
#131 of 604 by kyfdx HOST Aug 05, 2004 (3:07 pm)
My point is that just possibly, every person interested in the car is not just like you. The airbag cutoff is a feature offered in MOST two-seat cars, and to say "screw everyone who isn't just like me, go buy something else" as an answer to someone who thinks it is a feature that should be offered really does nothing to further the conversation about the car.   I guess you could start a discussion titled: "Only people who love the S2000 just as it is, post your messages here." But, you might get lonely in there.   regards, kyfdx

Messages Page 14 of 62 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 62 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Honda S2000 Honda S2000