You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Honda S2000
Honda S2000

604 messages, Last post on Mar 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM
You are in the Honda S2000 Forum. Your Host is claires
|
Replying to: sphinx99 (Jul 30, 2004 3:11 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: titan (Jul 31, 2004 4:10 am)
|
|
|
The tires are the biggest cost. Fuel economy isn't great if you're driving the car reasonably hard, and I just seem to find the interval dealer service (i.e. 15k mile service) being more expensive than other cars I've owned. There's also a lot more upkeep if you're fanatical about keeping the car looking good: shin etsu grease for all the rubber seals, regular doses of 303 Aerospace Protectant for the top, etc. My first set of RE050s bit the dust around 11k miles (rears) and were a solid $500 to purchase and mount. |
|
|
Replying to: radiate (Jul 31, 2004 2:17 pm) Does anyone have a decent website that supplies wheels for the '04 S2K? Love the car but Honda could have provided much sportier more aggressive 17's. |
|
|
Replying to: sphinx99 (Jul 30, 2004 3:11 pm) |
|
|
|
|
I have decided to buy a 2005 S2000 New Formula Red in Novmeber 2004. I looked around at lots of cars and have had lots of cars and this looks like the best for me. I live in Houston and it will be a daily driver, a lot of days with the top down on my 25 commute to work. Power, performance, handling, braking, reliability, slickest 6-speed available. Thanks, MidCow |
|
|
titan - Please do not let the Porsche namesake keep you from buying an S2000. The worst reason to select a car is based on "panache". Not intending to be mean, but that just sounds snobbish and ignorant. The S2000 performs better, out accelerates even the Boxster S, and Car & Driver even believed the interior (such as the steering wheel) was of better quality than of the Porsche. Too many people are set on the names of Porsche and BMW and willing to sacrifice the performance just to say they have one. This is complete nonsense to me since other higher-end Porsche/BMW owners probably mock the lower end owners anyway. About the tires, anything could be better, but I don't see the slightest thing wrong with the 17 inch tires Honda put on the S2000. Why do they need to be anymore aggressive and sportier? The car performs quite well and handles better than any other roadster (near its class) with the tires it currently has. Not one article out of the hundred I've read about this car has commented about the tires needing to improve. midnightcowboy - I currently have a formula red '04 S2000. I think the red and suzuka blue are a lot more unique on the road than the two silver shades. The black, white and yellow are two that I don't see as much either. The '05s are going to be out in September I believe. It will be interesting to see what Honda is going to be doing after that.
|
|
|
are an advantage... In fact, the car was just fine on the 16" it had prior to '04. Have you seen the price of 18" tires? The biggest drawback to the S2000 tires is the rate of treadwear. I personally would rather have an '03 Z4 3.0, but that is just a personal preference. It is nice to have choices like that. regards, kyfdx |
|
|
Replying to: carliker (Aug 02, 2004 10:20 am) Any reports on a new color for '05? Does anyone know of a dealership that has a silverstone w/ red interior? |
|
|
I still have no idea why anyone would despise the stock Honda wheels. Do you want 18" tires, new rims, "never die" ultra tread? What's the deal? The tread may wear, but that's the case with most sports cars. There is NO reason to spend $2K on new tires. I haven't put enough miles on mine to determine any long-term tread issues, but there isn't any other vehicle that handles better near the price. Obviously, a lot of that has to do with the tires Honda chose. The Lotus Elise ($8K-$10K more) doesn't even have 18" tires (17" on rear, 16" on front). At least Honda tires don't have the 350Z problems. The Honda S2000 DOES out accelerate the Porshe Boxster S. If you enter 2004 Porsche Boxster S acceleration times in a search engine, you'll find out that it goes 0 to 60 in 5.7 seconds. The 2004 Honda S2000 accelerates to 60 in 5.4-5.5 seconds according to two separate Car & Driver articles (among others I've read). The regular Boxster only goes to 60 in 6.4 seconds. The S2000 just doesn't break as well as the Boxster S. Finally, this vehicle wasn't made to drive kids around. It's a ride for sports car enthusiasts. Who cares about a cut off switch when a small kid shouldn't be in the passenger seat anyway? Go buy an SUV or a sports sedan for that. An intelligent economic decision is hardly "lame". Most dealerships carry silverstone with either red or black interior. It's a common color so it shouldn't be difficult to find at a dealership near you.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Honda S2000
Honda S2000
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Honda S2000



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats