Sign In Join 



Importing Car into Canada from US

4518 messages,  Last post on Dec 06, 2009 at 11:43 AM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Legislation, SUV


Messages Page 279 of 453
1
...
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
...
453
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2775 of 4518
Crossing border Monday by maluna
Dec 01, 2007 (2:22 pm)
Reply
We're hoping to go down Monday to bring back vehicle. We have completed paperwork, etc, waited 72 hours, etc. and I want to know, when you drive across the border, do you stop and meet with officials on the American side FIRST or do you just drive across and do your check-in, pay dues, etc, all on the Canadian side?
#2776 of 4518
lost Pilot by 03terminator
Dec 01, 2007 (2:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: darfer (Dec 01, 2007 12:32 pm)

The lawyer that I consulted was in Washington State and it was the freebie initial talk. She could not believe that dealers would refuse sell to Canadians. I ended up purchasing a very low mile used car, so I never pursued further with the lawyer. Although I am considering getting another vehicle when the RIV list gets straightened out. I would suggest that you contact a US lawyer close to you, if you want to pursue that angle, the initial consult is usually fee.
 
However, I find your situation fishy, a compliance label may be removed for reasons other than export denial. May be salvage, handicapped, modified, theft, attempt to void certification. Do you have a carfax of your vehicle. Whatever the reason, your best first step is to try to trade back for another one with a label and in compliance. Perhaps Honda is stonewalling because the vehicle at some point did not meet the fmvss standard. Perhaps the seller has some liability in selling a vehicle that does not meet the standard. If that fails, consult a lawyer. Perhaps they can persuade the seller to take back or trade the vehicle for one with a compliance label or contact Honda. A single letter from a lawyer can often do wonders.Is it an 2004. It seems odd that they would deny you for a used vehicle like that. I suspect a shady history for that vehicle.
#2777 of 4518
US residents by 03terminator
Dec 01, 2007 (2:45 pm)
Reply
So far, the OEMs have not put up roadblocks for US residents moving to Canada with their vehicles. Just get your paperwork in order well in advance of your move. They are attempting to block non US residents from exporting US cars. When the RIV admissible list gets sorted out most cars will likely become admissible again. I am sure the OEMs are on conference calls this weekend to figure out more roadblocks.
#2778 of 4518
Re: Crossing border Monday [maluna] by radar349
Dec 01, 2007 (3:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: maluna (Dec 01, 2007 2:22 pm)

You better stop at the US side first in order to "Export" the vehicle out of US.......if not, you may find yourself in deep dodo !
#2779 of 4518
Re: Crossing border Monday [radar349] by netdog
Dec 01, 2007 (4:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: radar349 (Dec 01, 2007 3:04 pm)

WARNING:
 
At the risk of looking like a real 'tool', let me share a bit of a nightmare I experienced when I tried to import my vehicle into canada several weeks back. I picked up my vehicle in Cleveland Ohio and drove 3-4 hours to the Detroit crossing export office. I am usually pretty detailed about lining up all my ducks in order and getting things right so I decided to double-check all of my paperwork before entering the export office - everything looked fine. Just for good measure I decided to check the VIN on the vehicle and I almost had a deart attack - it didn't match my paperwork. They gave me the wrong fr---ing car!!! Who the he-- would ever let you drive off their lot without checking that they gave you the right car?
 
I had to drive all the way back to Cleveland that night and make the switch in the morning at the dealership and drive back to US customs. The process at US and Canadian customs went really smoothe. I am now the proud owner of a 2008 Toyota Sienna XLE that I still cannot register until this immobilizer mess gets fixed.
 
Anyways, let this be a lesson to everyone: don't take anything for granted. Check everything yourselves and don't believe anything you hear. Save yourself a bunch of unnecessary trouble.
 
netdog
#2780 of 4518
Re: US Federal Trade Commission Complaint Form [darfer] by 03terminator
Dec 01, 2007 (6:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: darfer (Dec 01, 2007 12:32 pm)

I have a long shot for you. If the vehicle was registered in the US. It may be possible for NHSTA to issue a letter of compliance for the US. If they will, you then must convince RIV to accept it.
 
"7. Re-importing a U.S.-certified vehicle missing its certification label.
 
If your vehicle was originally manufactured to comply with all applicable FMVSS, and was so certified by its original manufacturer, it can be lawfully imported as a conforming motor vehicle under Box 2A on the HS-7 Declaration form to be given to Customs at the time of entry. If the vehicle is missing its certification label, it can still be imported as a conforming motor vehicle, provided you obtain a letter from the vehicle’s manufacturer stating that the vehicle was originally manufactured to comply with all applicable FMVSS. A list of manufacturer contacts is on our website at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/import/. If the manufacturer is unable or unwilling to supply you with a letter stating that your vehicle was originally manufactured to meet all applicable FMVSS, bumper, and theft prevention standards, we would be willing to issue you a letter stating that we recognize your vehicle as having been so manufactured, provided you can furnish us with evidence (preferably in the form of a State-issued registration document) showing that the vehicle was registered in the U.S. before it was shipped overseas. If you do not have the vehicle’s prior registration documents, you can furnish us a report from a commercial VIN checking service (such as Carfax) that identifies the vehicle’s prior registration history and shows that the vehicle was once registered in the U.S. If you have such evidence, you should fax it to the Imports and Certification Division at 202-366-1024.
#2781 of 4518
Re: No pre-Sept1st Prius' in SoCal.. [nnoodle] by sergelbergeron
Dec 01, 2007 (6:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nnoodle (Dec 01, 2007 1:25 pm)

Very ineresting I have a 2008 Prius - August built pckg #5 - I don't have the DRL and it should be programmable according to page 488 of the book, but the Toyota Dealer tells me it is not wired for the DRL. Very interesting - can you tell me more - email is sergebergeron.ca
#2782 of 4518
Re: Are 2008's now allowed across the Border? [dyip] by sergelbergeron
Dec 01, 2007 (6:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dyip (Dec 01, 2007 8:21 am)

As far as I know this is still the case - if you call the border - they are generally very cooperative.
#2783 of 4518
Canada Gazette amendment by dreyfus1
Dec 01, 2007 (8:06 pm)
Reply
There is a fifteen day period during which comments are invited.
It is a good idea to show your support by emailing
 
davisdatc.gc.ca
 
Refer to: Canada Gazette Part 1 Dec. 1 2007
               Department of Transport
               Regulations amending MVSR Section 12
 
Short statement, I wrote: "I heartily support the proposed amendment."
#2784 of 4518
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT [yahyahsout] by dreyfus1
Dec 01, 2007 (8:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: yahyahsout (Nov 30, 2007 1:04 pm)

It is a good development for all of us. There are other non tariff trade barrier, trip wires built into Canada's Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations about six in total. The mfrs zeroed in on CMVSS114 theft deterrent and immobilizer because coming into effect on Sept. 1 2007 there were no precedents admitting vehicles as there were with the other CMVSS XXX. I would like to think all is well and mfrs will display some intelligence from now on. IMO some mfrs have tarnished their reputations with their behavior relating to CMVSS114, it will cost them good will and business now and in the near future. We must thank Edmunds and RedFlagDeals without whose support we could not have pressured Transport Canada into amending the regulations. Remember the 15 day period is for receiving comments, this is not a done deal you are up against a large industry who know how to lobby. Get your expresions of support in, in the proper format. See my msg above.

Messages Page 279 of 453
1
...
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
...
453
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement