Sign In Join 



Importing Car into Canada from US

4513 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 8:40 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Legislation, SUV


Messages Page 229 of 452
1
...
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
...
452
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2281 of 4513
CBC national :Watch for this by kbrar
Nov 20, 2007 (2:45 pm)
Reply
watch cbc national I think this Harvard Gould is on at 5:30 est. with the business news… and the National is of course at 10:00…
#2282 of 4513
Re: not enough support [altaboy] by netdog
Nov 20, 2007 (2:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: altaboy (Nov 20, 2007 12:06 pm)

darfar, altaboy's got a point.
 
If you've failed to cross once due to this technicality, try and try again. Many posters here including myself went through customs without any physical inspection of the vehicle. Same thing goes for the CT inspection, although you may be dinged with re-inspection fees on that end if you need to try and try again. Regardless, the laws of averages are on your side and the costs are likely to be lower than the loss you will incur to return it.
 
Best of luck.
 
netdog
#2283 of 4513
Re: no letter for highlander Sport & limited [gabeman] by hoiya
Nov 20, 2007 (2:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gabeman (Nov 20, 2007 2:28 pm)

I think they key phrase here is:
 
   "Assuming this vehicle is listed as admissible,..."
#2284 of 4513
Re: not enough support [netdog] by darfer
Nov 20, 2007 (2:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: netdog (Nov 20, 2007 2:50 pm)

Not sure, but we think that If you go through Canada Customs with a Vehicle that is not able to get through they may mark your vehicle. ie enter the VIN into the computer and if you try to go through again they will cease your vehicle? Has anyone tried twice? Once we get through customs as approved, you don't need the Compliance label in Canada, it gets a new Canadian Label here.
#2285 of 4513
Re: no letter for highlander Sport & limited [wrajinder] by showmeanimport
Nov 20, 2007 (3:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wrajinder (Nov 20, 2007 1:21 pm)

Sorry friend...you are 100% wrong on this. RIV has confirmed for me 3 times with 2 different agents that this is totally not correct. All Toyota's manufactured after Sept. 1 are effectively now inadmissible because you will never get a 114 compliance letter. Period. This is reality now. RIV wont say they are inadmissible but they are because toyota will never give you the letter they tell you that they need...
 
I was interpreting things the same way as you but now know how to read the list. Every notes section has the words "See explanation section". These 3 words apply to all cars listed in the admissible column. When you refer to the explanation section it tells you that you need a 114 compliance letter. This is how it is working...
 
Sucks but true. They need to take all toyotas and list them as inadmissible because they effectively are...
 
Cheers
#2286 of 4513
Re: no letter for highlander Sport & limited [showmeanimport] by wrajinder
Nov 20, 2007 (3:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: showmeanimport (Nov 20, 2007 3:01 pm)

I have no idea when did you last time talked to them. Just to let you know It has been confiermed to me by 4 diff agents in last 4 days. Further to this I have been confirmed on this by TC directly. . Toyota has already sent info about highlander compliance to RIV last week.
 
Just to go into more detail. If you go and check specs for all vehilces shown as admissible without immobilizer as standard .They carry see notes section. as Highlander base model do. You have to see " safety" column in all vehilce specifications.
#2287 of 4513
Re: no letter for highlander Sport & limited [showmeanimport] by wrajinder
Nov 20, 2007 (3:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: showmeanimport (Nov 20, 2007 3:01 pm)

Just to clarify over here. After your post I just talked to another agent in last one minute. WE DO NOT NEED LETTER FOR HIGHLANDER SPORT & LIMITED MODLES. Please try to clarify yourself and post right info over here. I am just talking about 2008. highlander sport & highlander limited built after sept 1/07.
#2288 of 4513
pre Sept 1 2007 by eieio2
Nov 20, 2007 (3:31 pm)
Reply
has anyone imported a 2008 Cadillac EXT (pre Sept. 1) .... I have bought one and have not brought it to Canada as yet .... border did say the it was admissible
 
Just curious if anyone has imported one ....
 
Thanks!
#2289 of 4513
CBC Story on Immobilizer Trade Barrier by mars_25
Nov 20, 2007 (3:32 pm)
Reply
As per Post#2281 - check out the CBC tonight! Harvard Gould is on at 5:30 est. with the business news… and the National is of course at 10:00. Robert Lamb is going to be interviewed (who has been in stories featured in the Montreal Gazette and The Globe and Mail). Mr. Lamb also has sent open letters to PM Harper and Finance Minister Flaherty on this issue.
 
I guess we'll see if the CBC is a friend of the enterprising little guy or the overly anal bureaucratic establishment.
#2290 of 4513
nightmare experience by gaut
Nov 20, 2007 (4:33 pm)
Reply
Here is my story. On November 2nd I purchased a 2008 Sienna LE. Before purchasing, I phoned RIV because I couldn't find it on the lists of admissibility. I was told that this vehicle was admissible, so I made the purchase. On Nov. 9th I picked it up at the daeler in Fargo and made it to the Pembina border at 4:15 p.m. After having presented my papers I was refused entry. I felt sick. They told me the october manufacturing date was the problem with my vehicle. I was unable to contact anyone at RIV or Transport Canada and it was the start of a long weekend. I had to turn back and leave the vehicle in Pembina where it remains. A 12 hour day had now turned into a nightmare with many more to come. The following week, after numerous phone calls and emails to RIV and TC, I have not made any progress. I was told that the change of admissibility was made on Nov. 1st. I argued that I was given the wrong information by an agent at RIV and they had put me in this predicament.
I have been told about this announcement coming, but it sounds like only vehicles purchased before Nov 1st will be allowed in. These vehicles manufactured after Sept.1st have an engine imobilizer and not an anti theft engine imobilizer required in Canada. Toyota probably did this to prevent dealerships to sell to Canada. RIV and TC insist that Toyota is calling the shots. They are the ones who decide what is admissible according to Canadian standards. I was also told by an imobilizer installer in Manitoba that he can make this vehicle conform to standard for only 250.00$. The Toyota dealership meanwhile said it would cost thousands of dollars if they did it.
On Nov. 16th I went to check on my vehicle and changed the temporary permit. When I re-entered at the border, a guard told me I could take the vehicle in, but I would probably have to export it after TC makes it's announcement. Being alone and not wanting to add miles to the vehicle, I left it there.
I am at a loss as to what to do. Temporary insurance is only good for 30 days. I now have what is considered a used vehicle. I will probably have to trade it on another vehicle in the States (more time and money) and lose out on the trade. I am stressed out over this. If anyone has suggestions or ideas, please write them here.
Thanks

Messages Page 229 of 452
1
...
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
...
452
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement