- #1343 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [smogdung]
by poncho167
-
Apr 20, 2008 (9:00 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: smogdung (Apr 20, 2008 3:28 am)
Non-transferrable warranty. You are stuck with it, and if you do decide to sell expect Chrysler like resale value.
|
- #1344 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [smogdung]
by dmathews3
-
Apr 20, 2008 (3:33 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: smogdung (Apr 20, 2008 3:28 am)
Give me some details on sticker and what you paid plus what kind of rebates as I just sent an email to a dealer who has 6 of them. Also what year is yours? Email me if you rather do it that way. My email is shown in my profile.
|
- #1345 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [dmathews3]
by smogdung
-
Apr 21, 2008 (5:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: dmathews3 (Apr 20, 2008 3:33 pm)
I gave $20K plus a totally optionless '03 Alero /ecotec/5-speed with multiple dents & bondo..(had to try) that had 80K miles on it.....so I think total was <$23K OTD. MSRP was $36K. I'm not concerned with resale on the Crossfire....with the Lifetime Warranty....it's my last car....goal is to put 1,000,000 miles on it before I die! I'll email you.
|
- #1346 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [smogdung]
by dmathews3
-
Apr 21, 2008 (5:49 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: smogdung (Apr 21, 2008 5:25 am)
Got your email, and thank you for your response.
|
- #1347 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [smogdung]
by laco
-
Apr 25, 2008 (2:34 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: smogdung (Apr 16, 2008 12:37 am)
Regarding the recall, I had mine done. You can feel what was added, to the corner of the headliner, between the pillar and where the visors mount. Feels like a hard foam piece, but it doesn't show or look any different. Only took about fifteen minutes for them to do.
|
- #1348 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [laco]
by 62vetteefp
-
Apr 25, 2008 (6:10 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: laco (Apr 25, 2008 2:34 pm)
Interior head impact is not a precise science. There are requirements that the OEM's do all the testing for and pass but when the government does it it sometimes does not meet the law.
So you have a recall on a pretty silly item. What are the chances of your head hitting that corner real estate by the pillar? If you are wearing your seatbelt would you even come close? Sorry but for sure GM passed that test in their labs but a tiny change or variation and it did not passat the government. Not sure if it is worth the money and customer time for a recall.
|
- #1349 of 1403
-
Re: Getting terrible MPG... what could be wrong? [62vetteefp]
by laco
-
Apr 26, 2008 (3:50 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Apr 25, 2008 6:10 pm)
Silly or not, once the recall is in place, if not taken care of, within, 15 to 18 months, you can not renew the registration on the car, so not having it done is not an option.
|
- #1350 of 1403
-
recall timing
by 62vetteefp
-
Apr 27, 2008 (3:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: laco (Apr 26, 2008 3:50 pm)
Silly or not, once the recall is in place, if not taken care of, within, 15 to 18 months, you can not renew the registration on the car, so not having it done is not an option.
I have never heard of this. Must be a state rule? Most recalls are actually never done on vehicles so I do not see how this could be true. In fact how does a state office even get this info?
|
- #1351 of 1403
-
Re: recall timing [62vetteefp]
by laco
-
May 02, 2008 (2:15 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Apr 27, 2008 3:24 pm)
Don't know about other states, but California is notified of vin #'s of all vehicles recalled for saftey issues. They, DMV, is notified via computer when the work for the recall has been completed. You are given 12 to eighteen months, to have it done, if not when you go to renew registration, your DMV record for the car is flagged and can't be renewed until the work has been completed and DMV has been notified of its completion.
|
- #1352 of 1403
-
Re: HHR Test Drive [barnee61]
by p100
-
May 03, 2008 (8:19 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: barnee61 (Oct 09, 2007 10:29 am)
I test drove several new HHR's, both 2007 and 2008 models, all with a 5 speed manual transmission and both 2.2 and 2.4 liter engines. What struck me as obvious on the very first test drive (2.2 liter version) was the lack of power and slow acceleration. So much so that I asked the salesman if there was something wrong with the car. The 2.4 liter version was marginally better, but nothing much. I have a '99 Mazda 626 with a 2.5 liter V6 and 5 speed manual transmission and with 196k miles on it, The HP output is virtually identical to the 2.4 liter HHR engine, yet my Mazda accelerates much stronger in all RPM ranges - absolutely no comparison! And I get 26 MPG in city driving with A/C on all the time.
Is this HHR a rather heavy vehicle for its size? I found a new 2007 HHR LT2 completely loaded with a 2.4 liter and 5 speed manual, which is rare these days. But its obvious lack of performance has me rather stumped. I would be scared to even start a passing maneuver on a 2 lane road with traffic coming in opposite direction! Does the engine loosen up after several thousand miles and feel stronger? What kind of real world fuel economy can one except out of this thing with A/C constantly in use (I live in Florida)?
What is surprising to me is that I test drove a new Saturn Vue 2.2. liter 4 cylinder, 5 speed manual several years ago and it felt a lot stronger than an HHR with the same power train. Why is that?
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons 
