Sign In Join 



Chevrolet C6 Corvette

914 messages,  Last post on Aug 30, 2008 at 6:54 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Corvette Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Corvette, Coupe


Messages Page 88 of 92
1
...
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#864 of 914
GM pricing on Vettes? Is it possible? by tahoedds
Oct 08, 2006 (8:05 pm)
Reply
I have been told that GM pricing on Vettes is hard to come by but depends on the dealership. Does anybody if it is possible?
#865 of 914
Re: GM pricing on Vettes? Is it possible? [tahoedds] by brianapal
Oct 09, 2006 (4:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tahoedds (Oct 08, 2006 8:05 pm)

Do a Google search. Go to Google then advanced. On exact phrase type in Corvette Forums
One of the first (not the first) choices that you will have should have sub-choices, one of which is C6. Choose this choice. At this site you will find tabs to purchase a Corvette. You can find some great prices. If area dealers won't come close to matching them then Museum delivery, pick up at the dealer, or courtesy delivery are all options. (I have previously posted the other forum site but it my post was deleted by Edmunds. I was informed that this violated the rules of the forum.) You should be able to find it easily with a google search.
Good luck!

Brian
#866 of 914
Re: GM pricing on Vettes? Is it possible? [brianapal] by tahoedds
Oct 10, 2006 (11:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: brianapal (Oct 09, 2006 4:55 pm)

Brian, Thanks for the info.
I did find a dealer yesterday that will honor the GMS and they have what I want in stock. Thank you again.
#869 of 914
Consumer Reports Tests by fotorich
Feb 06, 2007 (7:30 am)
Reply
Hi guys its fotorich. I had the heat from the vents problem with my 51 packaged c-6 standard trans convertible. While I was forced to sell my c-6 because GM refused to fix the problem, I sure wouldn’t believe or go by anything Consumer Reports had to say.
 
Several years ago Dr. Bose, of Bose speakers, confronted Consumer Reports about a lousy review received by one line of his home speakers. He had a meeting with editors and was ridiculed and lambasted because he wanted to know their testing procedures. They refused to divulge any information about the tests and went into a personal attack on him. He sued Consumer Reports. In open court Consumer Reports actually admitted they do not do any testing. But hired “experts” to evaluate the products that were being scrutinized. As an example, they would contact a writer and hire him at $500 to do a report on four different manufacturers of speakers in the range of $800 to $900 each. Now do you think this writer was going to spend $3600 minimum to test speakers while receiving only $500. Yeah right. The writers report on the speakers was published with the stats taken right off the free brochures and not measured by him. Obviously this occurred with all their so called tested items including car tests. Believe it or not Consumer reports won the case. They argued that reports printed in their magazine constituted editorial opinion and was a right under the first amendment. They even had several well known car magazines editors say they would have to shut their doors if Dr. Bose won. Sorry guys but the emperor really doesn’t have any clothes.
#870 of 914
Re: Consumer Reports Tests [fotorich] by rayainsw
Feb 06, 2007 (9:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: fotorich (Feb 06, 2007 7:30 am)

While Consumer Reports is hardly perfect, your statements here regarding the lawsuit brought by Bose do not agree with what I read here:
 
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,955280-2,00.html
 
or in the published Supreme Court transcript, here:
 
http://www.oyez.org/media/item?type=audio&id=argument&parent=cases/1980-1989/198- - 3/1983_82_1246
 
Regardless of the outcome ( CU won their case, Bose lost ) there is reference by the Bose Corp. lawyer acknowledging significant testing done by CU.
 
I see nothing to indicate any sort of admission that CU did no testing before the report in question. Or that anything like what you describe occurred. The crux of the issue is something quite different.
 
I have Consumer Reports issues dating back for quite some time, and it is quite clear that they do, indeed actually purchase the products they test. Unlike every other consumer oriented magazine that tests cars. ( The others, including Edmunds, all request ‘loaners’ from manufacturers’ test fleets. )
 
I do not use Consumer Reports as my only source of information regarding cars ( C6 or any other ) but I do read their reviews and the results of their annual reliability survey.
 
I truly sympathize that you had an unresolved service issue with your C6. But how is any of the ( factually unfounded, as far as a lunchtime Google search & read seems to indicate ) additional ‘stuff’ you posted here relevant?
 
- Ray
Very confused . . .
#871 of 914
Consumer Reports and Bose by claires HOST
Feb 06, 2007 (9:49 am)
Reply
It makes sense to refute/affirm any of CR's specific reviews of the C6 here, but a general discussion of CR's reliability/practices would probably draw us down a bumpy side road. While this discussion's interesting, it would probably be more at home in the News & Views Forum.
#872 of 914
Consistency of Reviews? by wideglide
Feb 09, 2007 (10:04 am)
Reply
I don't know if this has been brought up here, coming in so late to the topic, but there is a major discrepency about the shift quality of the manual transmission. In "First Drive: 2005 Chevrolet Corvette", Edmunds said:
 
"The standard six-speed manual, however, is the big shocker here. The clutch is smoother and lighter, and the shift feel is — dare we say — "Miata-like" in its snick-snick shift quality. Even the shift knob is perfectly shaped."
 
However, in the "Follow Up Test: 2005 Chevrolet Corvette Convertible", they say:
 
"The long throws between each gear are only part of the problem. The real killjoy is the extra resistance — and excessive clunkiness — felt through the shifter as each cog is swapped. Thankfully, my young passenger is oblivious to such elements. Yet the stopwatch during instrumented testing was not. With the 2-3 upshift proving particularly challenging, we'd estimate a good two-tenths of a second were lost in that transition alone."
 
Now which is it? The statement above certainly doesn't sound "snick-snick" and "Miata-like".... Hopefully, someone from Edmunds will read this, and explain how they came to such vastly different opinions of the same transmission.
#873 of 914
Re: Consistency of Reviews? [wideglide] by rayainsw
Feb 09, 2007 (10:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: wideglide (Feb 09, 2007 10:04 am)

"explain how they came to such vastly different opinions of the same transmission. "
 
Editor_Karl used to respond to such questions. No longer, that I am aware of...
Sad - I used to enjoy that Forum - a lot!
- Ray
Very curious about similar aspects of tests & impressions published here...

Messages Page 88 of 92
1
...
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement