Sign In Join 



Chevrolet C6 Corvette

914 messages,  Last post on Aug 30, 2008 at 6:54 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Corvette Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Corvette, Coupe


Messages Page 67 of 92
1
...
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
...
92
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#660 of 914
Suggestion on stock C6 parts by starrow68
Jan 03, 2006 (12:07 pm)
Reply
The shocks you want may just be lying around pretty soon at some Corvette speciality shop that is upgrading to after market components. One shop I know in Roseville, CA seemed to have lots of excess stock parts during the C5 run.
Randy
#661 of 914
Suggestion on Stock C6 Parts by vicv
Jan 03, 2006 (6:55 pm)
Reply
Randy,
 
Softer shocks are about $80 ea at my local Chevy store. I haven't called Fichtner or FredBeans yet, but will this week. However, do you have the name of the shop in Roseville? I have a friend who lives there and can get them to me if they have some good ones at a reasonable price.
 
Thanks,
 
Vic
#662 of 914
Edmunds comparos by topspin628
Jan 03, 2006 (7:12 pm)
Reply
So please explain this to me. In the 2000 sports car comparo the Corvette finishes first and the 911 third. If you read the article you see that they are not so impressed with the 911.
In a 2002 comparo of luxury sports cars it also finishes behind the Lexus SC and the MB SL. Cheap interior and rough ride etc.
Then in the latest article it's the quintessential sports car and best by far in the head to head with the C6 Corvette yet it's character hasn't changed much at all. Maybe just a bit of an upgrade to the interior but still basically the same type of ride. Today I am sure that Edmunds wouldn't even mention an SC430 in the same breath.
 
Seems like maybe different editors using different criteria?
#663 of 914
Re: Edmunds comparos [topspin628] by tsy
Jan 03, 2006 (10:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: topspin628 (Jan 03, 2006 7:12 pm)

In 2000 and 2002 they were comparing the 996 911, which is the largest 911 ever. In 2005 the 997 911 came out, which is much improved over the 996. This is the car they've been comparing the Corvette to. We still chose the Corvette over the 911, but it wasn't an easy choice. In the end, the Corvette was much more livable on a daily basis than the 911. I would say the build quality of the 911 is better than the Vette, and it does have 2 microsopic back seats (it could at least fit my kids). That said, we couldn't be happier with the Corvette and have not regretted the purchase.
 
Hope this explains a little.
 
tom
#664 of 914
Re: Edmunds comparos [tsy] by topspin628
Jan 04, 2006 (9:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: tsy (Jan 03, 2006 10:18 pm)

I would love to hear your experience and opinion on the Vette as I have recently become enamored with it's looks.
I have only had BMW, Infiniti, MB and Lexus for the last 20 years and would never consider American for fear of quality and because there really is nothing other than the Vette that is interesting to me. I want to reward myself (50 years young) with a sports car and I'm beginning my search. I want a convertible and something with personality. I drove the Boxster and was not that impressed. I found the visibility somewhat poor and felt like I was sitting in a bath tub. I also found the engine noise to be a bit artificial as it felt like it was being pumped into the cabin. I may drive again though. I never drove the 911 but I guess I'd be looking at almost 100K for cab. and don't think I would go for that unless I just "had to have" after driving it.
How do you like the vette for daily driver?
Do you drive in bad weather? A bit of ice or an inch or two of snow?
Which suspension do you have?
How has the quality been?
I hear that it can be hard to control with possible tail spins. I am not a hot rodder and like a car I feel is safe and I can control.
 
The verts loaded are around 62 MSRP so I was wondering about the "value" factor. Used to be best bang for buck.
I want a real smile inducer, so what's your take?
 
Thanks for any input.
#665 of 914
Well almost comparable ... by starrow68
Jan 04, 2006 (11:45 am)
Reply
I have had a C5, 2002 coupe for 4+ years and going on 48k miles. I came at the Vette from the bottom end, Nissan and MG for most of 25 years so can't compare to higher end cars. For smile inducement, the Vette with only 350hp is just about tops, at least 0-60 up freeway ramps is still legal and really fun. I have taken mine on road racing courses for the past 3 years and it is more capable than everything close in price and pushes 911's that are close to double the price.
   Now for some of the down side. The S2000 with race tires is less expensive and faster on track, but a very tight fit, at least for me. The Evo and WRX can be very quick on track but as more ralley cars seem to get into roll overs more often that others I've seen and not what makes my boat float. On bang for the buck the Vette is hard to beat, I'd recommend looking for used ones, they exist and go for a few drives with and without sales people. Then I look on the internet for pricing before going to any local dealer.
 
    To answer a few questions, I'm in San Francisco East Bay, worst we get is heavy rain and mine is a daily driver and track car both. I tried driving something else to BART for a couple years but liked the C5 so much I decided I would not worry about exceeding the 6/60 extended warranty on mileage before time. I did come back from Nevada and had to do 30+ miles in a snow storm down I-80 and due to stability control had no issues going over inch or two of slush between lanes when necessary, slowly for sure but it would keep me straight and true. Love the car as a daily driver.
 
   The shop in Roseville is Motorsports Image, they have a web site. Ask for Mark or Terry
#666 of 914
Re: Edmunds comparos [topspin628] by starrow68
Jan 04, 2006 (12:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: topspin628 (Jan 04, 2006 9:09 am)

Another thought on quality, probably much better in the C6 than in the C5, but there are still issues that have been discussed elsewhere on the web. Some of the new electronics have had what some describe as niggling problems. Have to get input elsewhere. My C5 has had a steering sensor go bad, replaced under warranty, had a rear brake system module go bad, replaced under extended warranty. Currently the radio seems to have decided it knows what channel is best without my input, soon to the shop. Oh, also the seat control was replaced under recall.
#667 of 914
Re: Well almost comparable ... [starrow68] by habitat1
Jan 04, 2006 (5:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: starrow68 (Jan 04, 2006 11:45 am)

"The S2000 with race tires is less expensive and faster on track"
 
I am surprised to hear you say that, given that I thought I also read a post of yours indicating that your Corvette is faster than a 911S and Boxster S on a track.
 
As a former S2000 owner, I will always remain a big fan of the car. And as someone who has not (yet) been to a track, I claim no first hand experience. However, as much as I liked the exceptional handling of the S2000, the PASM equiped Boxster S I considered was even better, and if I am not mistaken, remains the top car on Road and Tracks list in the slalom. My 911S is not quite up there with the Boxster S, but according to my seat of the pants from 4,000+ miles, and the test reviews I've read, still equal to or above the S2000 in handling.
 
Again, I am no track expert. But it would seem to me that even if the S2000 could keep up with the Boxster S and 911S through the tight curves, it would both have a significant disadvantage on the straights. The 911S has a 0-100 time of under 10 seconds, about 4 seconds quicker than the S2000.
 
So what am I missing in my armchair track speculation?? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment.
#668 of 914
Re: Well almost comparable ... [habitat1] by jmess
Jan 04, 2006 (10:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Jan 04, 2006 5:55 pm)

There are lots of very capable cars available today. Go drive the C6 so you can compare it to the others. I wish they would hurry up and finish sweeping up all the gravel they dumped during our one day snow/ice storm so I can drive mine again.
#669 of 914
Re: Well almost comparable ... [habitat1] by tsy
Jan 05, 2006 (1:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Jan 04, 2006 5:55 pm)

I watched a Japanese video with a 350Z track edition, S2000, Boxster S, and M3 raced around Tsukuba. They used a Nissan Skyline GTR as the camera car. The 350Z and S2000 spanked the Boxster- it just couldn't keep up and was way behind after just 2 laps. The S2000 was better than the 350Z on the curves, but the Z just pulled away on the straights, so the S2000 couldn't pass the Z. But near the end of the race the Skyline just blew them all away effortlessly. (We might get the next version here!)
 
I would guess a Z51 (and certainly a Z06) would leave the S2000 behind on a track. As good a car as the S2000 is for the money, it has too much of a deficit in power. But then again, it would also depend on the track too. I hope to get some track time in this spring and may be able to tell you more then.
 
tom

Messages Page 67 of 92
1
...
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
...
92
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement