- #98 of 664
-
Re: Rebate? [nugget49]
by jpwalsh1277
-
Jul 05, 2005 (10:22 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: nugget49 (Jun 11, 2004 12:16 pm)
Just saw some thing in the paper about jeep is planing to match chevy's rebates starting soonest. GM has decided to extent for another month, on their current rebates.
|
- #99 of 664
-
2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines
by billo14
-
Jul 10, 2005 (12:46 pm)
-
|
I am going to use the jeep to drive on rough gravel, dusty roads in the Arizona White Mountain region going to fishing lakes with little if any off-road intentions. No rock climbing and very little off the main gravel road is expected.
Would there be any opinions out there about which engine I should look for in purchasing a used vehicle? Please give me your insights and opinions.
|
- #100 of 664
-
new jeep
by bjp4
-
Jul 10, 2005 (3:30 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: billo14 (Jul 10, 2005 12:46 pm)
i got an 05 jeep wrangler X rocky mountain edition. options added were a hard top, Air condition, front floor mats, auto transmission. price: 23,200 w/o TTL. i didnt do much negotiating. The price is a couple hundred below the employee price + $500 cash back. I have searched around to see what others have been paying, but couldnt really get an idea.
|
- #101 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [billo14]
by mac24
-
Jul 10, 2005 (3:35 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: billo14 (Jul 10, 2005 12:46 pm)
Why not post your question over on the Wrangler forum?
I think you'll get several replies!
|
- #102 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [mac24]
by billo14
-
Jul 11, 2005 (8:40 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mac24 (Jul 10, 2005 3:35 pm)
Mac 24, I thought I was on the Wrangler forum. Humm, guess I haven't figured this forum out yet. Maybe the question was not real important either. Thanks. Bye
|
- #103 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [billo14]
by mac24
-
Jul 11, 2005 (8:46 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: billo14 (Jul 11, 2005 8:40 pm)
In case it wasn't obvious, click on the word Wrangler in my previous post to be taken directly to that forum.
|
- #104 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [mac24]
by billo14
-
Jul 12, 2005 (6:45 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mac24 (Jul 11, 2005 8:46 pm)
I've been on a few forums before, but it will take a lot more time to figure this one out. Those that use it, understand it, but I haven't spent the time, so that will have to come later.
I posted a message last evening, that wasn't even on the forum early this morning. It appeared sometime in the last hour. I'm not used to a lengthy pause before posting ....... if that is really happening. I really can't even be sure of that.??
|
- #105 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [billo14]
by mac24
-
Jul 12, 2005 (9:56 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: billo14 (Jul 12, 2005 6:45 am)
There appears to have been something screwy happening with all the Edmunds forums this morning.
Usually your message will appear instantaneously. Unfortunately it's not there on the Wrangler forum yet. Maybe one of the hosts could step in here please?
|
- #106 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [mac24]
by kirstie_h HOST
-
Jul 13, 2005 (6:13 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mac24 (Jul 12, 2005 9:56 am)
Hm... I've never had that happen before. Maybe the system ate it?? You might try posting in our topic called Forums Software! Your Questions Answered... That's where our staff with technical expertise can answer such questions. All I can do is point you to the Wrangler topic again: Jeep Wrangler if you want to try re-posting. I haven't had any of my messages disappear this morning, so maybe there was a glitch.
kirstie_h
Roving Host
Host, Future Vehicles & Smart Shopper discussions
|
- #107 of 664
-
Re: 2.5L 4 Cyl versus 4.0L I6 Cyl engines [kirstie_h]
by mac24
-
Jul 13, 2005 (9:20 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: kirstie_h (Jul 13, 2005 6:13 am)
Maybe it was just me, but yesterday morning I had messages disappearing and reappearing, together with notifications of new messages when there weren't any. This was all in the Wrangler forum. The only thing different from usual is a string of huge pics that have been posted there.
Interestingly, when the messages disappeared and reappeared the numbering was all correct for whatever was displayed.
|