Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord vs Acura TSX
661 messages, Last post on Aug 20, 2008 at 5:51 AM
You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: loi177 (May 15, 2008 9:03 pm) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: loi177 (May 15, 2008 9:03 pm) If the engine has to be revived you might want to try a different one. The TSX accelerates similarly to a 4-cylinder Accord. Not that that is a bad thing, but if I'm getting V6 economy, I want V6 torque and power. Me? I drive a 4-cylinder Accord; it gets better mileage than the TSX, and on regular. If you like the TSX and how it accelerates, I'd try a 4-cylinder Accord as well; you'll save money upfront and on fuel.
|
|
|
Replying to: loi177 (May 15, 2008 9:03 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (May 16, 2008 2:07 pm)  
|
|
|
The Accord coupe looks bloated next to the TSX actually. The '04 I saw at the Honda store last week was a black/black car and was realllllly nice, leather felt real soft though neglected a bit. If the wife wouldn't have killed me it would be in my side of the garage right now. But the frugal side of me brought me back to reality real fast as I'm real happy with my '06 Civic. But just for awhile that TSX would've been fun. Better to save the $ for the kids cars later this year. Have set aside about $30k for that big purchase, as they will both need econocars as their 1st cars especially with the gas prices rising almost daily. The Sandman
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 16, 2008 2:59 pm) |
|
| My neighbor has the TSX he started with the prem. switched over to reg. when the prices went up, he puts regular in it now and he said there is not much of a difference in performance or mileage. The knock sensors will take care of the rest. | |
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 16, 2008 6:10 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: loi177 (May 18, 2008 11:36 am) Incidentally, if we use C&D as a measuring stick (using numbers from one source helps minimize launch differences), the 2004 TSX with a stick-shift accelerated from 0-60 in 7.2-7.5 seconds, depending on which test you prefer to go by. Car and Driver measured a 2007 2.4L Accord with a stick shift doing the 0-60 in 7.2 seconds. I use the 2006-2007 Accords for my measuring stick because that's what I drive, and that's what I have compared firsthand. Thus, I stand behind my initial statement. What the TSX does not have is more usable torque than the 4-cyl Accord. Around town, they feel similar. With an automatic, especially. When driving as normal folks do, I could tell little difference between a 2004 TSX Auto and my 2006 Accord Auto (166hp). Horsepower and torque peaks come higher-in the RPM range, meaning while you have to rev the sweet 2.4 to get the power, it isn't as readily available back below the stratusphere where most people drive (below 6,000 RPM). Here's a quote from Car and Driver's Road Test of the 2004 Acura TSX. the TSX mill doesn't deliver much grunt below 3000 rpm, but as the tachometer creeps toward peak torque, the engine pulls strongly to 6000 rpm, at which point the cam profiles go long for the 1100-rpm sprint to the redline. The TSX is heavier for a smaller car as well, actually weighing a little more than the last 4-cylinder Automatic Accord (Gen VII, which we have been talking about here) tested in Car and Driver. Accord lacks the quality of 3 stage paint of TSX. Nobody mentioned paint, but ok.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 18, 2008 12:34 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord vs Acura TSX
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Accord
2011 Acura TSX
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
