Mazda MX-Flexa / Mazda5

2063 messages,  Last post on Jan 12, 2007 at 12:04 PM

You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum.

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA5, Van



#2024 of 2063 I got mine back ... by perfectofc

Oct 27, 2005 (2:07 pm)

Patience - this car is not a lemon.

#2025 of 2063 Re: Oct 27, 2005 Come and Gone and still nothing [hkeogh] by smaria

Oct 27, 2005 (4:12 pm)

Replying to: hkeogh (Oct 27, 2005 1:03 pm)
Which lemon law attorney? Do you have a link to his/her website that you could post?
 
I DO love the Mazda5, but the lemon law may be the only way for me to get out of having to deal with my flooded vehicle (flooded while the dealer had it). So, I'm keeping all options open until I figure things out.

#2026 of 2063 Mazda MX-Flexa / Mazda5 by claires HOST

Oct 27, 2005 (11:51 pm)

This forum's for discussing the features of these vehicles; if you'd like to talk about lawyer referrals or other personal matters, please handle it outside the Forums. Thanks.

#2027 of 2063 Motoring Test by wheelz4

Oct 31, 2005 (8:22 am)

A recent test on Motoring 2005 (on TSN, the Sports Network) pegged the gas mileage for the Mazda5 at 44 mpg! Is anybody getting that? If the 5 is able to better it's Transport Canada rating by over 10 mpg, then that pretty well erases the only major gripe I have with the 5 (well, that and those useless side sills!)

#2028 of 2063 Re: Motoring Test [wheelz4] by perfectofc

Oct 31, 2005 (10:27 am)

Replying to: wheelz4 (Oct 31, 2005 8:22 am)
I was getting high 30's before the recall... haven't checked it since.

#2029 of 2063 Re: Motoring Test [perfectofc] by skelton

Oct 31, 2005 (10:36 am)

Replying to: perfectofc (Oct 31, 2005 10:27 am)
Imperial Gallons?

#2030 of 2063 Correction by wheelz4

Nov 01, 2005 (7:10 am)

The Motoring info was wrong....it should have been 34 mpg (and yes, that's Imperial gallons). Still, 34 mpg overall, during an auto test involving skidpad testing and a variety of driving/filming is not too shabby, I guess.

#2031 of 2063 Re: Correction [wheelz4] by smaria

Nov 01, 2005 (7:13 am)

Replying to: wheelz4 (Nov 01, 2005 7:10 am)
it should have been 34 mpg (and yes, that's Imperial gallons)
 
That's roughly 28 U.S. MPG overall...not bad at all!

#2032 of 2063 EPA by ateixeira

Nov 01, 2005 (11:28 am)

I wonder why the EPA numbers are so low. Usually it's the other way around.
 
-juice

#2033 of 2063 Repairs complete & got my car back by wruberte

Nov 01, 2005 (10:48 pm)

It has been a long and difficult. Mazda USA, when push came
to shove did what was right. Three managers from the dealership
here in Ga were hostile, uncooperative, misleading, and in one
circumstance paranoid. Due to the business relationship gone sour, I
will have the vehicle inspected by another Mazda Service Shop to
ensure all is alright with the vehicle.
 
Wish you all better luck and happy trails.
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement