10833 messages,
Last post on Feb 26, 2013 at 5:40 AM
You are in the
Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Subaru, Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Sedan, Wagon

Your Community Leaders are ateixeira and rsholland.
#3480 of 10833 Re: Legacy Outback worst rollover rating? [mylegacy]
by lumbar
Aug 10, 2004 (11:00 am)
Granted that this is the 2004 and that the 05 has a lower center of gravity despite it's higher profile, but it strikes me that this info still has some relevance--not the least for those who are driving the previous generation. It also strikes me that it's worth looking into the extent to which the new version has lowered the center of gravity, and I still think that one has to accept these tests (just like the side impact tests and braking info) as saying -something- worth knowing, particularly given Subaru's desire to position itself in the "safe car" segment of the market. How -much- one wants to rely on the info is obviously up to the individual.
Aug 10, 2004 (11:08 am)
Pete: sounds like a good idea. I'm glad they agreed to do that more thorough check/test.
-juice
Aug 10, 2004 (11:10 am)
Depends on how you read those rollover ratings. The 2004 Outback is about only half as likely to roll as that Toyota pickup.
For anyone that puts this as a high priority, I suggest the VDC model, or any car with at least stability control.
-juice
#3483 of 10833 Re: CD-Rs [tsy]
by frankw
Aug 10, 2004 (11:27 am)
Actually, I also bought mine on 6/30, so maybe you should be congratulating me too!
Congratulations, Tom!
On another topic, here in Santa Fe we are in a restricted water usage regime. I believe we may not wash cars at home and may only go to a commercial car wash once per month. On the other hand, usually the only dirt that gets on the car is a very fine light brown dust. What do those of you who use clay, Klasse, etc. recommend for this situation?
Frank
Aug 10, 2004 (11:31 am)
take my most demanding use of my cars. accelerating into 2 lanes of 60mph traffic with no acceleration lane, uphill and water/snow is usually in this area.
now take your fast mustang and my fxt and lets see who can get up to speed.
these guys think that everyone is driving in SoCal type conditions.
now that is just straight line, now get a wet curvy road and any subie takes the mustang.
and what about at high altitudes when those NAs lose there punch, let alone a gravel type road. i love these 15 minutes of edit time....
heck look what mike, paisan, does in his old old subaru against the high power cars on the track...
Aug 10, 2004 (11:34 am)
You forgot "at high altitudes", where non-turbos are wheezing and losing power.
-juice
#3486 of 10833 Rollover....
by hypov
Aug 10, 2004 (11:36 am)
aren't those rating based on mathematical calculations?
If they are derived from real world testing, how do they come up with percentiles like 15.9, 12.1, etc...? Also, if they are physically testing for rollover, how could they know it will roll with those training wheels in the way?
It will take alot of bad luck, throw in bad road condition(s) and terrain(s), to roll the OB.
-Dave
#3487 of 10833 Re: Rollover.... [hypov]
by njswamplands
Aug 10, 2004 (11:38 am)
It will take alot of bad luck, throw in bad road condition(s) and terrain(s), to roll the OB.
yeah juice didnt even roll one at las vegas....
Aug 10, 2004 (11:41 am)
But my grunting happened in a Legacy GT.
They had an off road course for the Outback but it was closed until the following day, we were BUMMED about that.
-juice
#3489 of 10833 i would like to raise not the issue of the side impact test
by njswamplands
Aug 10, 2004 (11:45 am)
but with all of this rollover talk, why dont they have a rollover impact test? i mean if the bloody roof collapses like a beer can, its has to offset the side impact results.
so if subaru aced the rollover and the rav4 pancakes, big advantage subaru